Shrek the Third Discussion Thread (Warning Spoilers Ahead)

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Shrek the Third Discussion Thread (Warning Spoilers Ahead)

Post by disneyboy20022 »

Ok I just got back from seeing Shrek the Third at Midnight... Only 8 people showed up including me and 5 of them were Movie Employees.. (its a small locally owned Theater) IF some of you thought Spidey 3 stunk... well....... This movie tanked worse than Shrek's Body Odor.... I mean they get you all worked up that this is the best Shrek yet and in my opinion it really wasn't as great as all the hype that is created around it... I mean passing gas and burping can only get you so far in a CGI movie..... Big Let down for me.... I mean I will probably buy the DVD when it comes out but I probably won't waste more money going to see it in theater.. It just lacked originality from the first and second Shrek.... I mean Shrek 2 had originality and was not a useless sequel... although the Third Shrek was pretty useless... and the Movie was rushed.....

SPOILER WARNING of Ending AHEAD typed in white.... Ye Has Been warned


and the Ending I thought was terrible...... I mean the villains all listened to Arty's pep talk... and turned good... Except for Charming... He I think If I remember had a tower from the the set of the musical fell on him and then he didn't go to jail or anything... He's still alive at the end of the movie... at least I think........ I honestly thought that he should have been eaten by Dragon... Although they we wouldn't be getting Shrek the Fourth......
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
User avatar
Paka
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Paka »

Disappointment for me, too. Incredibly bland and tamed down... too many aggravating close-up dialogue shots, as well; that the voicework was painfully bad didn't make these scenes any better... >_<

Despite all this, I'm sure it'll go on to earn $300,000,000 in the U.S. :roll:
Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late."

~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
PixarFan2006
Signature Collection
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Michigan

Post by PixarFan2006 »

I still want to see this, despite the fact that it will not be as good as the first two. So far, it has mixed reviews.
dvdjunkie
Signature Collection
Posts: 5613
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by dvdjunkie »

Sorry to burst your bubble about this one, but I think, after seeing it last night with about four hundred other Shrek-lovers, this is going to be bigger than the first two.

First, you don 't go to a "Shrek" movie for the plot. You go to have your funny-bone tickled, and to have it stroked by the blend of fairy-tale traditions and pop-cultural references, which come at you a mile-a-minute in this one.

A quick look at the 'plot' will reveal: Shrek awakens one morning to find that he is next in line to the throne of Far Far Away. Orgres, being ill-suited to statemanship, Shrek is desperate to find someone who is more suited to the job. He leaves his newly-pregnant wife, Fiona, and with his buddies Donkey and Puss in Boots sets off to find Fiona's cousin, Arthur (presented Doogie-Howser-ish) voiced by Justin Timberlake. Shrek finds this 'nobleman' at a boarding school that resembles a cross between Hogwarts and ZIP code 90210.

The jokes, both visual and verbal, come at you a mile-a-minute, and it will definitely take a second-watching of this film to get them all. The funniest sequence of the movie is the 'nightmare' Shrek has about his impending fatherhood, filled with dozens of crawling, crying, pooping, home-destroying chartreuse babies. I think I laughed at this harder because I can remember when my wife told me many years ago that I was going to be the father of twins and I had nightmares for weeks.

My favorite new character is Merlin, voiced by Python Eric Idle, a skinny old gint in too-short robes, white socks and Birkenstocks.

All that being said, there are some NEGATIVES to this third installment of Shrek. The writers once again try, in vain, to bring a moral to this story right in the middle of the movie. The film is the longest of the three Shrek movies at 93 minutes, and the first half clips along at a break-neck pace until it gets slowed down by this moral-telling, and once we get passed that, it takes off again. You would think that the writers would have learned and profited by their mistakes in the first two and avoided this in the third one.

That being said, this movie will join in the summer box office and currently for the next few days go head-to-head with Spiderman 3, and next Thursday run head-on into Captain Jack Sparrow and the three-hour-long part three of "Pirates of the Caribbean". The first two Shrek movies have brought in over $1 billion at the box office, and I don't think this third installment is going to slow down the franchise. Since there is already plans for a "Shrek 4" and "Shrek 5", we might as well get used to the fact that our favorite little green man is going to be around for a while.

I would give this movie a strong 3.5/5 and recommend that everyone see it at least once, and then go see it again to pick up the jokes that you missed the first time.

:roll:
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

The original Shrek was a fun little stab at the tame classic cliché Disney films.

But it's a little hypocritical of Katzenberg to do 5 of these movies, a holiday special, a puss in boots spinoff and a prequel.

That's worse than Disney's ever done, who have abandoned the DTV business now.

Shrek has become what it once mocked. time for Dreamworks to move on. Aliens VS Monsters sounds fun. Leave Shrek alone now please.
User avatar
musicradio77
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Contact:

Post by musicradio77 »

I can't wait to see this movie with my brother. It's going to be funny!
Disneyfreak1990
Special Edition
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:34 pm
Location: america

Post by Disneyfreak1990 »

the fifth Shrek is only rumored right now, not confirmed. we can't take Antonio's full word since they might be making it but not finish it at all. this film looks funny since i liked the first two for the comedy, since it's not one of those films which have sex comedy only, and the fact that i like fairy tale type stories so it's fun to see what fairy tale character it is i'm seeing.
User avatar
numba1lostboy
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:10 am
Location: Joining the Resistance.

Post by numba1lostboy »

First off, I never knew Shrek 5 was in negotiation...I thought it was Shrek 4 along with a Puss spin-off...

Secondly, I thought this film was a riot. I agree with dvdjunkie. You don't come for plot, you come for Eddie Murphy's and Antonio Banderas' on-screen comedic chemistry. The SNL ladies as the princesses was just an added bonus.

I also LOVED Hook in this film. Hilarious. Especially the part where he finds "Peter".
And his other line: "Avast, ye cookie!" :lol: :lol:

The bad things I have to say are few:
-The king's death scene I think went a little overboard. It teetered on bad taste for me.
-The villians turning good. I HATE that. They're villians! They're not supposed to turn good!
-Justin Timberlake. Totally wrong for the part and only got it because he was with Cameron at the time.

All in all, a worthy sequel. And those dragon-donkeys are SO CUTE.
:pan: Love It.
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

I haven't seen this movie yet but I haven't been too excited about this one at all, since it just seemed weak to me. I really liked Shrek 2 when I saw it, though. The only reason I might watch is Julie Andrews. By the way, does she have a bigger part in this one?
User avatar
numba1lostboy
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:10 am
Location: Joining the Resistance.

Post by numba1lostboy »

UmbrellaFish wrote:I haven't seen this movie yet but I haven't been too excited about this one at all, since it just seemed weak to me. I really liked Shrek 2 when I saw it, though. The only reason I might watch is Julie Andrews. By the way, does she have a bigger part in this one?
No, sorry. She's there, but her part is kind of ignored...if you think about it, doesn't her existence put the whole plot to shame. Wouldn't she just be queen alone instead of Shrek having to be king?
:pan: Love It.
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

numba1lostboy wrote: No, sorry. She's there, but her part is kind of ignored...if you think about it, doesn't her existence put the whole plot to shame. Wouldn't she just be queen alone instead of Shrek having to be king?
Aww.... I thought she got a bigger role. I guess I'm okay though. I've always been a little mad she joined Dreamworks. And you're right about the queen ruling alone thing. Although, I don't see her ruling without the king. They just go well together.
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

I am taking thekids to see it tomorrow afternoon
Dark Knight Rulez
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

I'm gonna take my daughter to see it tomorrow.

As said twice before, its not about the plot. Its the entertainment value. I doubt it will be Oscar worthy, but it will be a nice 93 minute escape into fun for a little while.

And I absolutely love the dronkeys. I keep stopping at McDonalds to see if they have the dronkey toy in yet. I have all the other dronkey toys. Except the one that Walmart has with the DVD. First, I already have the DVD. $20 just to get a really lame-@$$, badly made stuffed toy that looks like it belongs in the cheapie crane machines is not worth it to me. But I got the twin dronkey toys Walmart sells. They are damn cute. :D
User avatar
PeterPanfan
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:43 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by PeterPanfan »

I actually liked it. Mostly because of the comedic performances. I absaultely loved Sleeping Beauty ans how she fell asleep every fivr seconds...and of course,Pinnochio and the Gingerbread Man always crack me up. :) :lol:
Cierra_Dancer
Limited Issue
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:54 pm

Post by Cierra_Dancer »

Hey first post! Woot woot!

So about the movie. I actually liked it a lot. I loved the A Chorus Line music, and the dronkeys are amazing. The animation is amazing. I really loved the princesses, I know some disagree with me, but I still loved them. I loved Cinderella's and Sleeping Beauty's fighting skills.
Image
User avatar
DarthPrime
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2520
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:55 pm

Post by DarthPrime »

I went to see a afternoon showing of this today. Pretty empty theater, but people were already getting tickets for the evening showings. I agree that the Third will be just as big as the first two.

I wasn't disappointed with this film at all. I still prefer the original Shrek to the two sequels, but this was a solid film filled with a lot of laughs.

The ending with the villians turning good was a little weak, but didn't ruin the film for me at all.

Artie was ok, but Merlin was hilarious. Gingy was also great as usual. Come on who would have thought we would see a Gingerbread Man's life pass before his eyes.

Compared to my feelings for Spider-Man 3 this film officially started the Summer Movies for me.
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Post by Disney's Divinity »

numba1lostboy wrote: No, sorry. She's there, but her part is kind of ignored...if you think about it, doesn't her existence put the whole plot to shame. Wouldn't she just be queen alone instead of Shrek having to be king?
Maybe that's meant to be a subtle jab at The Lion King.

:wink:
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
PixarFan2006
Signature Collection
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Michigan

Post by PixarFan2006 »

Shrek the Third made 38,000,000 on it's opening day.
User avatar
magicalwands
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2099
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:24 am
Location: Gusteau's Restaurant

Post by magicalwands »

DarthPrime wrote:The ending with the villians turning good was a little weak, but didn't ruin the film for me at all.
Even though it is supposed to show how Arthur will be a good king, I would have rather had a huge war against the villains.

I admit it, I wished the Fairy Godmother would've come back from the dead somehow because she was a good rival for Shrek. Prince Charming doesn't come close.

When Snow White was singing in the forest diverging the trees, was that a reference to Walt Disney's Snow White because they even had her voice "beatened down" as if it was a recording made from long ago with an old microphone.
Image
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

We went to a 12PM showing today and it was nearly sold out, a seat here and there, but our theater has 10 theaters and 3 of them had Shrek and 2 Spiderman. Anyways we enjoyed the movie
Dark Knight Rulez
Post Reply