Matty-Mouse wrote:2099net, how can you like those shorts from 1964 onwards? I think some of them are alright (Daffy's Diner being one) but many are just dull, lifeless and are a waste of time and money.
On a completely different note, for your Looney Tunes website why not just use the plot synopsis from Jerry Becks Looney tunes book, it would be much quiker than writting your own.
Well, it's true that the classic Looney Tunes characters are presented badly in the 60's cartoons - the non Chuck Jones RoadRunners are visibly inferior to the earlier ones, and I'm not that fond of the glut of Daffy Duck/Speedy cartoons. I never thought that pairing worked well. Also, animation quality throughout suffers compared to the golden age.
But... the New characters work well I think - after all a Cool Cat cartoon my be Looney Tunes by name, but it's really competing with the Hanna-Barbera cartoons of the time, not the classic Looney Tunes. And as a cartoon of the time, the Cool Cat, Bunny and Clyde - and even the Merlin the Magic Mouse - cartoons stand up well.
Plus by my reckoning there's about 60 cartoons in the Looney Tunes' "dark age" - enough to put in one box and get it over and done with. The fact that they are in colour and do feature Daffy, Speedy, Road Runner and the like mean that the average guy in the street will not feel cheated if he bought the set. Then after assuming a reverse order release pattern, future volumes would be pure gold.
I cannot see forward chronological releases - black and white cartoons, no familar characters, "racist" characters like Bosko etc would ever work as the average punter would not be receptive to the contents.
As for the book - I take it you mean "Looney Tunes and Marrie Melodies: A Complete Illustrated Guide to the Warner Bros. Cartoons." - That's my prime souce of information - but even copying the plot write-ups would be a lot of work!  
