Disney Duster wrote:A lot of classics and good films mixed with what I think or at least assume is a lot of crap. It's kind of weird as well as disheartening. Pinocchio's not on there and it's widely considered Disney's most high quality film. I think Beauty and the Beast and Snow White are, though, so seeing them on here makes a lot of sense. At least my third favorite Disney film (Mermaid) made it in.
I don't know why Cinderella (1950) sold so poorly. My guess is because it was released not long before it got released again, not everyone has Blu-rays, and I guess it's not really one the most popular of the popular classics.
Pinocchio at least is a high seller when it comes to just Disney films. Anyway, as we all know in America these days, trash sells. Sometimes enough to even get it elected to the highest office. I'm glad Snow White and The Little Mermaid made it. I wonder how far off Aladdin is.
In the VHS days, the six most best-selling classics were all of the six main princess films but minus Sleeping Beauty, and The Lion King. So Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Cinderella, The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and The Lion King. Clearly the film was popular then which only cements my belief that the DP franchise alienated the film, at least to the male gender. I'm sure most of the DP films suffered from this, but Cinderella as the central face got it the worst. And I can speak from experience since even I owned all the six classic DP films on DVD except for Cinderella. It came out during the time when I felt I was too grown-up for Disney and I thought Cinderella was too girly and childish. Yet, when The Little Mermaid came out later, I had no issue picking that up. I think Sleeping Beauty suffers a little bit from this too, because it doesn't have the benefit of Snow White for being the first Disney film and having lots of historical significance, nor is it from the 90s Big Four.
Escapay wrote:Disney's Divinity wrote:So Frozen's been number 1 every year since it was released, right? No way it won't end up inducted into Disney's elite film line (Plat/Diamond/Signature/etc.).
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if it gets a Signature Collection or some other named re-issue in Fall 2019 to tie in with
Frozen 2. That would put it in the requisite five-year-window in which the re-issue would now fall under the jurisdiction of a catalog title and not a new release. And given that it was supposed to get an extras-heavy 3-D Blu-Ray release for late 2014 but that never happened (traces of it can be found in the Target bonus disc, which had a voice actors featurette that could clearly be a chapter within a larger documentary, and a few more deleted scenes not on the main release), I can see them just packaging that ready-made material (including "Frozen Fever" and "Olaf's Frozen Adventure"?) in a new disc, plus a sneak peek at the sequel.
Yeah, I would love a proper release with so many more extras and featurettes, including the Frozen Broadway Show, Hyperion Show, and Epcot ride.