Yes. I think it was stupid of the original film to say only two characters can wear blue. Really, just use a different kind of blue to the effect you want. As for Cinderella, it can be gleaned that she dreamed of finding love, but there is also a sense she dreamed of a better life where she wasn't a slave to an evil stepfamily.taei wrote:I love it says that her blue costume makes her standout, when there are other people in the village wearing blue.
haha
Also, while I am not a huge fan of Cinderella and I haven't seen the movie in a while, correct me if I'm wrong... but I don't recall Cinderella ever wishing that she got married. And let's not forget that Ariel initially just wanted to live among humans. Eric was a catalyst to her decision..
That's only your opinion.Disney's Divinity wrote:Being important has nothing to do with it at all.Disney Duster wrote:I think the Beast needs a name because I think a character as important as him should have one
LOL!Disney's Divinity wrote:this film should not waste its time trying to please non-fans.

And one other thing:
HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! The world DID care because the filmakers of this film CARED enough to make the Beast's castle in eternal winter while the rest of the locations are in one season!Disney's Divinity wrote:…And if it didn’t, the world would not care.Disney Duster wrote:And I forgot to say, this film taking place in Winter will finally resolve the problem of how long Belle was gone and her father was searching for her and how it seemed four season all passed so quickly...
Do we even know if the whole film takes place in winter here? I’m sure they won’t have “Belle” being performed in a cold street.
Hm. Well I still don't like what they say about their own characters these days.Disney Duster wrote:The same book I found out there was a debutante ball with the prince in the beginning of the film has another thing in it that I wanted to post here. I can't post every page of the book because it would be too much, but this little snippet I find troubling and wonder what everyone else thinks about it, concerning one of our other favorite Disney characters:
JeanGreyForever wrote:I didn't find it that troubling mainly because they've been saying this about the Disney Princesses for years now. How Ariel may have been more feminist than the early princesses but she was still deeply flawed and then Jasmine came about as Ariel 2.0 and was a regression from Belle because the filmmakers didn't want her to steal time away from Aladdin.