Frozen: Part III

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Locked
User avatar
Prince Kido
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:51 pm
Location: France Paris
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Prince Kido »

You're welcome. :)

Sotiris : I won't spoil about who's dating who at the end because it wasn't not mentionned or spoiled in the preview I attended, but I can tell that in the many clips we saw, one was about the first romantic and comedic meeting between Anna and Hans.

disneyprincess11 :

1. So, my sneaky suspection was right-Sven will not speak?
_ You're right, Sven doesn't talk but acts like a dog (like Maximus... :/ )

2. Do you hear ALL OF THE VOICES? If so, as a big Broadway nerd who's always up-to-date with the latest shows, I GOTTA ask this: Is Santino Hans?
_ I'm sorry but they even didn't mention the names of the original casting so I don't know who is voicing Hans (and I even don't know from my contacts). But I do hear all the voices of the main characters, though for Elsa, it was "only" her singing.

3. Do you see the king and queen?
Not in the preview but I have references of them.

4. Is Hans the villian?
I won't answer this question, sorry.

5. What are the other songs like?
Hard to describe in words. I know the titles and how much songs there are in the movie since a while, though we hear entirely 2 songs at the preview + a bit of a third one.
They were all different to each other, but the most-most memorable and best one is definitively Elsa' song "Let it Go".
You will love it and Idina is awesome.
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21225
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Sotiris »

Thank for all the info, Prince Kido! Much appreciated!

I'm glad the king and queen will appear in the film. Not happy about the Sven/Maximus and Anna/Rapunzel similarities.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by PatrickvD »

Why would they make Sven into a cardboard copy of Maximus, personality-wise ... ?

Seems so pointless and uninspired....
User avatar
Prince Kido
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:51 pm
Location: France Paris
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Prince Kido »

I don't know why there are those similarities.
I wonder how the audience will react as it is obvious that there's a Tangled's vibe in Frozen.
I guess the success of Tangled helped a lot.
See, the beginning of the teaser mentions in my language (french) : "by the creators of Tangled", using the same marketing plan than all the other studios of animation while Frozen is clearly not directed by Howard & Greno.
Anna looks a lot like Rapunzel, with different hair of course, more round face and cheeks and little more almond eyes but she looks very charming and adorable anyway. That didn't bother me that much, but maybe because I'm used of the characters since last year. About Sven, sure he acts like a dog as well as Maximus, but I would say that there are not the same type of dogs, lol !
User avatar
disneyprincess11
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by disneyprincess11 »

Prince Kido wrote:2. Do you hear ALL OF THE VOICES? If so, as a big Broadway nerd who's always up-to-date with the latest shows, I GOTTA ask this: Is Santino Hans?
_ I'm sorry but they even didn't mention the names of the original casting so I don't know who is voicing Hans (and I even don't know from my contacts). But I do hear all the voices of the main characters, though for Elsa, it was "only" her singing.
5. What are the other songs like?
Hard to describe in words. I know the titles and how much songs there are in the movie since a while, though we hear entirely 2 songs at the preview + a bit of a third one.
They were all different to each other, but the most-most memorable and best one is definitively Elsa' song "Let it Go".
You will love it and Idina is awesome.
Ok, so I am taking that they haven't finished the voice recordings yet because it was only Elsa's singing.

Also, do you think you can tell us who sings the songs? And are you allowed to tell us the titles and the # of songs (I'm taking that you are not allowed to?) Can not wait for Idina! :D :D :D :D
User avatar
Prince Kido
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:51 pm
Location: France Paris
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Prince Kido »

Yeah, sorry, I'm not allowed to tell the number and titles of the songs, especially since there always can be some slight changes until the final release in theaters you know.
The movie is still in full production.
But the clips they decided to show at the preview doesn't mean the voices are not recorded : on the contrary, they are for most of them, and sometimes it usually happens there are some twickles here or here, that's all.
The clips I saw doesn't feature Elsa talking, that's all and it will still be Idina Menzel who will voice her, in addition of being her singing one. :)
Hope that makes sense...
User avatar
disneyprincess11
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by disneyprincess11 »

Yeah, as a hopeful future work for Disney, I totally understand! :wink: Thanks for the info!

Plus, wasn't I See the Light written and recorded during Summer 2010...a couple of months before it came out?
Tangled
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:37 pm
Location: Canada, eh.
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Tangled »

Prince Kido wrote:.
Btw, Olaf is a funny character but sweet too and people laughed a lot.
This is nice to hear. I'm perfectly OK with comic relief characters if they're actually funny and can be emotional. Also, the fact that he's voiced by Josh Gad makes it even more awesome.

On that note, I was just listening to The Book of Mormon album the other day and, despite how offensive and crude it was at times, it also is making me way more excited for this film. The music by Robert Lopez is awesome. Josh Gad is awesome. The lyrics are hilarious. I'm actually getting even more hyped for Frozen...all because I'm listening to music from an adult satire musical.
Image
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16287
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Disney's Divinity »

Rodrycroft wrote:And Pocahontas wasn't hated by everyone... a lot of people (including myself) liked it even more than The Lion King for example. It was horribly underrated because it hadn't a happy ending and for don't being "better" than The Lion King.
I don't think either of those are the real reasons it's generally unpopular... :/

Not surprised that Sven looks like a repeat of Maximus, considering they are pretty much copying Tangled in every possible way.
On that note, I was just listening to The Book of Mormon album the other day and, despite how offensive and crude it was at times, it also is making me way more excited for this film. The music by Robert Lopez is awesome. Josh Gad is awesome. The lyrics are hilarious. I'm actually getting even more hyped for Frozen...all because I'm listening to music from an R-rated satire musical.
I preferred his music in Avenue Q myself. I do like that Josh Gad is going to be in this, but I'm still not looking forward to that character.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ "Elizabeth Taylor"
Katy Perry ~ "bandaid"
Meghan Trainor ~ "Still Don't Care"
RodryCroft
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:52 am

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by RodryCroft »

Disney's Divinity wrote:
Rodrycroft wrote:And Pocahontas wasn't hated by everyone... a lot of people (including myself) liked it even more than The Lion King for example. It was horribly underrated because it hadn't a happy ending and for don't being "better" than The Lion King.
I don't think either of those are the real reasons it's generally unpopular... :/
Well, that's one of the reasons, there are more for sure, but when I was a kid and Pocahontas just came out, the non-happy ending was the main "problem" for the people I talked to about the film :/ I know it's not as good as many others, but I still think it's underrated :(

So! The Tangled teaser trailer came out on 6/11/10 (Friday), Wreck-it Ralph on 6/7/12 (Thursday)
Today is 6/7/13 and Friday.... I don't want to freak anyone out, but we're getting closer xD I don't know why I'm this excited anyway... we won't see Elsa or Anna on that teaser ¬¬
User avatar
DisneyEra
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1520
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by DisneyEra »

RodryCroft wrote:
Disney's Divinity wrote:I don't think either of those are the real reasons it's generally unpopular... :/
Well, that's one of the reasons, there are more for sure, but when I was a kid and Pocahontas just came out, the non-happy ending was the main "problem" for the people I talked to about the film :/ I know it's not as good as many others, but I still think it's underrated :(

So! The Tangled teaser trailer came out on 6/11/10 (Friday), Wreck-it Ralph on 6/7/12 (Thursday)
Today is 6/7/13 and Friday.... I don't want to freak anyone out, but we're getting closer xD I don't know why I'm this excited anyway... we won't see Elsa or Anna on that teaser ¬¬
I downloaded the "Tangled trailer 1" on 6/10/10, while WIR's trailer 1 was out on 6/6/12. The official Frozen trailer should be out around the 1st week of August, with Disney's Planes & D23 expo.
User avatar
Edthehyena
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 5:53 am
Location: Paris

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Edthehyena »

Well, nothing new at all in fact, expect worrying confirmations...

Just a goofy Olaf and a Maximus-like Sven to " eat " in a few days... No new stuff before long... Final movie with un-inspired artistically poor Tangled style... Too much waiting with really nothing, nothing, nothing real at all.

I feel like i don't care anymore for Frozen. I feel a little sad, bored.

Happily, a little spark in me keeps believing there will be something mystic, dark, magic, very emotional and dramatic in Elsa's story. I have to keep believing that.
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by thelittleursula »

Super Aurora wrote:
thelittleursula wrote: Grow up Super Aurora. Seriously.

You don't even know why I'm laughing at that post, do you? So I think you should shut it.
First that is seriously rude and secondly I don't care what you've laughing at- laughing at somebody's post in a immature way like that is borderline cyber bullying.

So you should shut it.
TheValentineBros
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:26 am
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by TheValentineBros »

thelittleursula wrote:
Super Aurora wrote:
You don't even know why I'm laughing at that post, do you? So I think you should shut it.
First that is seriously rude and secondly I don't care what you've laughing at- laughing at somebody's post in a immature way like that is borderline cyber bullying.

So you should shut it.
Yeah, Super Aurora, you are laughing because you like all those modern day cartoons! The '90s were so much better! They had better cartoons than those stupid retarded cartoons like Regular Show or Sanjay and Craig or even Gravity Falls! Remember, the '90s was an awesome decade!
Image
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Super Aurora »

thelittleursula wrote: First that is seriously rude
No it wasn't. I was simply laughing at blind nostaliga equal everything to the 90's movies. Everyone here(not just him/her) has to compare everything to the early 90's movies as if there going be some recycle going to happen.
thelittleursula wrote:and secondly I don't care what you've laughing at-
Then you shouldn't have bother lecturing me and acting like an internet white knight. Please.
thelittleursula wrote:laughing at somebody's post in a immature way like that is borderline cyber bullying.
No it isn't. If that's you're definition of cyber-bullying or even close to it, you're really naive. If I was really cyber bullying I'd give a way more nastier sentiments that would probably get me an instant ban.
thelittleursula wrote:So you should shut it.
No.


TheValentineBros wrote:Yeah, Super Aurora, you are laughing because you like all those modern day cartoons! The '90s were so much better! They had better cartoons than those stupid retarded cartoons like Regular Show or Sanjay and Craig or even Gravity Falls! Remember, the '90s was an awesome decade!
I dunno if you making a sarcasm to poke fun of their posts and is actually agreeing with me, or you're actually serious and directly responding me this. But if the latter,

I'm laughing at what I said to thelittleursula and these bold:
disneyprincess11 wrote: I have a feeling that this could be this decade's Pocahontas. When the Disney Renaissance came out, there were 3 huge hits-Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, and Lion King, which every loved. But when the 4th movie came out, Pocahontas came out, a lot of people HATED IT.

And now, in the Disney Returns Era (I'll call this for now because I forget the name for this :/), there are 3 hits: Princess and the Frog, Tangled, and WI-Ralph. This is the 4th film in this era and there are some backlash from people about Anna's appearance to some insiders who saw the movie or some clips and said that so far, the movie is too generic with the characters, plot, and humor.

Hopefully, this will be a hit and be probably the "Beauty and the Beast" of the decade. :|
first off I like how he/she thinks Princess and the Frog was huge hit as if it was anywhere equivalent to (in the case going by chronological order comparison) Beauty and the Beast in order to make this "new era will be just like the Renaissance! era1" comparison.

2nd, I like how he/she dismiss or forgot Winnie the Pooh when claiming Frozen is the "4th film" of this era. Granted, I don't blame her for forgetting, Winnie the Pooh was hardly remembered and marketed. But still at least get your facts rights.

Last, expecting Frozen to become the "beauty and the beast" of this decade is extreme unrealistically high expectation. REALLY High.


My point is that you shouldn't hold too high or too low on these films when it comes out. It would only ruin the enjoyment of the film for you. It's one of the reason why I'm not in such an obsessive hurry to want something of this film spoiled out like many of you here are doing.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21225
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Sotiris »

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16287
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Disney's Divinity »

I believe I'm starting to like Kristoff's design. Sad when I like his design more than either of the leads' designs.
Super Aurora wrote:Everyone here(not just him/her) has to compare everything to the early 90's movies as if there going be some recycle going to happen.
You can't really blame them, considering Disney themselves have tried to recycle the '90s as much as possible with TP&TF and Tangled (and I'm guessing again with Frozen).

Also, Winnie the Pooh was a sequel, so I'm sure that's why it's overlooked--just like Fantasia 2000 and The Rescuers Down Under.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ "Elizabeth Taylor"
Katy Perry ~ "bandaid"
Meghan Trainor ~ "Still Don't Care"
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21225
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Sotiris »

Disney's Divinity wrote:I believe I'm starting to like Kristoff's design.
Really? It's hard to tell what he looks like from the picture above. It's so blurry and in that angle he looks like Tintin's and Captain Haddock's love child.

Sven looks like he's going to be incredibly annoying. Perhaps it's his idiotic-looking grin. Why do they always resort to the same stock expressions when it comes to animal characters?
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16287
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by Disney's Divinity »

Sotiris wrote:in that angle he looks like Tintin's and Captain Haddock's love child.
:lol:
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ "Elizabeth Taylor"
Katy Perry ~ "bandaid"
Meghan Trainor ~ "Still Don't Care"
TheValentineBros
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:26 am
Contact:

Re: Frozen: Part III

Post by TheValentineBros »

Super Aurora wrote:
TheValentineBros wrote:Yeah, Super Aurora, you are laughing because you like all those modern day cartoons! The '90s were so much better! They had better cartoons than those stupid retarded cartoons like Regular Show or Sanjay and Craig or even Gravity Falls! Remember, the '90s was an awesome decade!
I dunno if you making a sarcasm to poke fun of their posts and is actually agreeing with me, or you're actually serious and directly responding me this.
Image
Image
Locked