How Cinderella's 2005 Release was Restored Very Wrongly

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Lnds500
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Post by Lnds500 »

Marce82 wrote:Hey everyine,

First off: Jade, if you go to the first part of this thread, the first entry goes into a good amount of detail about what is wrong with the Platinum transfer.

Now that the blu ray is out (which I have no intention of buying), I am curious. Can anyone do screen grabs of the shots we have been "studying" on this thread so we can compare?

Also, looking at the screencaps on the review on this site, the colors seem to be a bit better... less blue tinted. Am I nuts?

So does it looks just like the Platinum dvd, but in HD???
Hmm, that's quite some work. I might do it if no one else does it first, but long story short, the restoration is the same, the transfer is the same, the colours are the same, only the resolution has been bumped to 1080p. ;)

check the first post on this page (mine) to see some screengrabs of the BD and compare to the OP
User avatar
The_Iceflash
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
Location: USA

Post by The_Iceflash »

Screenshots from Blu-ray.com

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Cinderell ... creenshots


Well well, not as bad as we wanted them to be are they? :wink:
User avatar
Lnds500
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Post by Lnds500 »

The_Iceflash wrote:Screenshots from Blu-ray.com

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Cinderell ... creenshots


Well well, not as bad as we wanted them to be are they? :wink:
Well well, they are exactly the same as the ones we posted ;)
User avatar
ProfessorRatigan
Special Edition
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:10 pm
Location: Arkansas

Post by ProfessorRatigan »

What's with all the winking!? :wink: Every post on this page has a wink! :wink: Oh, god! Now I'M doing it! :wink: THE MADNESS! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: *dies*

...In all seriousness, there are undoubtedly SEVERAL areas of concern with this restoration. (The comparisons speak for themselves) And frankly, I can't see how those images don't BOTHER some people. Just like the clouds being taken out of the Lion King, or the fuck ups on Beauty and the Beast's 'special edition,' (specifically the inexplicable background change in Something There) these are all horrendous examples of tampering with the original films and, really, need to be addressed. Because if they aren't, Disney will assume they have carte blanche to treat these movies however the hell they want. And the message, I think, that pointing these flaws out sends is that, "No, this sloppy work isn't acceptable for a company that is so damn wealthy. FIX THEM. Or expect to lose my money as a consumer in the future." ... :wink:
Marce82
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1475
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Marce82 »

Oh my God... it looks terrible!!! Did you guys see that screen grab that has Cinderella and the Prince with the clock bhind them striking midnight??? Look at her face!! Its like all the detail is gone...look at the (lack of an) outline in her arm....
I thought the point of HD was to SEE more detail...

Lord...
Marky_198
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1019
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 11:06 am

Post by Marky_198 »

Have mercy.......

The Disney Classics are gone.
I believe this is going to ruin Disney.

The new generation will never know what these films used to look like with all the detail.....
And therefore have a completely different and much more shallow view of these films.

It's also very surprising to me that the Blu fanboys are so happy with less detail? Can you tell me what you love so much about that?
User avatar
Lnds500
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Post by Lnds500 »

Marky_198 wrote:Have mercy.......

The Disney Classics are gone.
I believe this is going to ruin Disney.
No hyperbole there :lol:
Marky_198
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1019
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 11:06 am

Post by Marky_198 »

Nope :) Actually an understatement for a billion dollar company that does this to its films......
ianwahlers
Limited Issue
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:59 pm

Post by ianwahlers »

Not that I'm trying to defend Disney, but just trying to understand, could it be possible that the masters used for the DVD restoration had deteriorated since the LaserDisc had been made so they were unable to get a print with the finer details?
User avatar
Lnds500
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Post by Lnds500 »

ianwahlers wrote:Not that I'm trying to defend Disney, but just trying to understand, could it be possible that the masters used for the DVD restoration had deteriorated since the LaserDisc had been made so they were unable to get a print with the finer details?
It doesn't look like these are source problems though. They look like restoration problems. I'm having difficulty believing these are the only negatives that have deteriorated. Bumbo is much older for example, the Blu-ray is gorgeous. Also, at the time when the LaserDic was released they didn't use the original negatives, they used dupes. The first movie released which has been restored from the original negatives was Bambi in 2003. If anything , the BD should look better
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

Lnds500 wrote:The first movie released which has been restored from the original negatives was Bambi in 2003.
I quite distinctly recall a restoration featurette on Snow White's Platinum DVD in which it was said that for the film's 2001 DVD release, the restoration house started the process using the original nitrate negative.

Also, what are dupes? Copies of the original negatives (i.e. 2nd generation, 3rd generation, etc.)?
User avatar
Lnds500
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Post by Lnds500 »

Jules wrote:I quite distinctly recall a restoration featurette on Snow White's Platinum DVD in which it was said that for the film's 2001 DVD release, the restoration house started the process using the original nitrate negative.

Also, what are dupes? Copies of the original negatives (i.e. 2nd generation, 3rd generation, etc.)?
yes, copies of the original negatives.

I can't comment on that featurette since I don't have the Platinum release. Here's the article I based my answer on, really great article

http://whysoblu.com/a-talk-with-disney- ... -of-dumbo/
Now that you can create these new transfers based on the original negative, are you planning to go back to the previous releases, like “Sleeping Beauty,” “Snow White,” and use the original element there?

(Sarah Duran-Singer): We actually have. Any – those Blu-rays were – they were done in the same manner that we did “Dumbo.”

(Sean Ferguson): Oh, I thought I heard you say that you weren’t able to do that until “Bambi.”

(Sarah Duran-Singer): Oh, well, yes, but “Bambi” was the first one was did in 2003, so anything after 2003 was done in this manner.
Christopher_TCUIH
Special Edition
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:40 am
Location: California

Post by Christopher_TCUIH »

I think I deserve a job at Disney's restoration team! I fixed Cinderella with an app on my phone :)

Image
Before
Image
After (voilà more fairy dust)

Image
Before
Image
After (color correction)
Marce82
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1475
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Marce82 »

Ummmm.... errrr.....hmmmmm.... no. Just no.
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Post by thelittleursula »

It's sort of sad that a Disney fan can do a better job on a phone than a so-called professional at his work by a computer...
Christopher_TCUIH
Special Edition
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:40 am
Location: California

Post by Christopher_TCUIH »

^ Exactly! That was the joke. The fact that you can fix the colors on a cell phone app yet the professionals can't be bothered to change it. Although in their minds they already fixed it lol.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

I don't know about the colors Christopher_TCUIH but you did a great, better looking job with the sparkles!
Image
Christopher_TCUIH
Special Edition
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:40 am
Location: California

Post by Christopher_TCUIH »

I did them in like 10 minutes so obviously it's not that great lol
Topher
Limited Issue
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:18 pm

Post by Topher »

I just watched this for the first time and really, I don't have a problem with it. Since I haven't seen it on VHS I guess I am unaware of the 'proper' colours and thickness of the outlines and all, but running at 24fps I couldn't fault it. And this is from someone who gets irked by the blurry scenes when Prince Phillip rides through the forest in Sleeping Beauty, which disrupts what is otherwise a perfectly restored film.
Image
HarryCanyon
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:28 pm

Post by HarryCanyon »

I think the blu-ray did the best job for the best restoration ever.
Post Reply