
I knew instantly.

August is officially awesome.
I'll be 19!gumby17 wrote:that's cool, my bday is the 24th!nachonaco wrote:I can't wait for this!My boyfriend just called me and said (my birthday's on the 29th) "hey, hon, guess what i'm getting you for your birthday? hint: It's something Disney!"
I knew instantly.
August is officially awesome.big 18!
Thanks for that. I honestly expected the thread to explode back at me.Juuchan17 wrote:Ditto that.Vermin Friends wrote:You are my new hero.
While it's certainly possible [and likely] that Cinderella III could turn out to be the better film, I just don't even understand the point in comparing. I mean, I try not to judge any film as bad or good based on the good or bad in another film. I know some people have been claiming that AB will be the "best DTV," and that's probably why you compared the two in the first place, but I still think judgment should be reserved until you've seen the finished product. I remember commercials making Treasure Planet look horrible, but it turned out to be one of my favorites.But Disney has given us a great sequel so far, Cinderella III. As for our biases, it's true I have one, but when trying not to let it get in the way and comparing CIII with AB, I legitimately see CIII as being better than AB in many ways.
You're right--I love Ursula. I don't think I would've turned out a Disney fan without her. I just don't consider her, or many of the other villains, pure evil. You could certainly read the original that way--with Ursula being evil incarnate--but Ursula does have some depth. She isn't evil for the sake of being evil (like the bland Maleficent). She's bitter and arrogant, not a murderess. I honestly don't think she did anything serious to be banished beyond becoming proud and overreaching the power she once had (think Yzma). I'd rather see the prequel good without her, than wrong with her.You had that problem with mine, too. I'm curious why, you love Ursula. Also, I think it fits to have old characters return with old villains, and it's not a stretch to think the same evil that hurt you in the past continues to, it's more epic and feels all cool in a movie.
Wow . . . okay, so I'll take back my comment about Athena sounding like an older Ariel . . . XDOld Fish Tale wrote:New clip! Click here! What a voice!
I've never nodded so much to someone's post before. You wanna be my best friend?Disney's Divinity wrote:You're right--I love Ursula. I don't think I would've turned out a Disney fan without her. I just don't consider her, or many of the other villains, pure evil. You could certainly read the original that way--with Ursula being evil incarnate--but Ursula does have some depth. She isn't evil for the sake of being evil (like the bland Maleficent). She's bitter and arrogant, not a murderess. I honestly don't think she did anything serious to be banished beyond becoming proud and overreaching the power she once had (think Yzma). I'd rather see the prequel good without her, than wrong with her.You had that problem with mine, too. I'm curious why, you love Ursula. Also, I think it fits to have old characters return with old villains, and it's not a stretch to think the same evil that hurt you in the past continues to, it's more epic and feels all cool in a movie.
Besides, I think Marina looks to be a halfway decent [minor] villainess. She suits the needs of this film--a powerful villainess like Ursula would bring too much. Which is where I disagree with Jim Hill's review, as a film doesn't need a domineering villain to cause problems and lead to a "happy ending." The original already has that. Can't this film just focus on the relationship between the family?
You are my second new hero.UmbrellaFish wrote:As a fan, I can say that I think this film may be TLM's "Enchanted". What I mean is, a lot of tribute will be paid to the first films and series. Number one, if you watch some of the clips you will notice some characters resemble characters from the series. Number two, think about everyone who thought Marina was Ursula. Even though she's not, there's a lot of resemblances, which makes me think Marina was homage to Ursula.
I thought from the very beginning to this very moment that the animation looked good. On-model, fluid, and I fail to see the chopiness everyone is talking about during the Catfish Club scene. Maybe I haven't seen that particular clip... but who knows?
I've also heard that Marina is supposed to be very funny, actually funny and Yzma is one of my favorite villians, so I'm bound to enjoy Marina. Not to mention I love the sound of Sally Field's voice.
Then to add on to what Disney's Divinity said about comparing the films, I said this as soon as the first clip came out at the beginning of the year, "Let's not compare it to Cinderella III: A Twist in Time because we'll be disappointed". TLM3 is not 100% original (BUT... to be fair, it's not like Cindy3 invented traveling back in time, however it was different for a Disney Princess), the animation is not 100% perfect, and Julie Andrews is not in it.![]()
But it does have it good sides. More music, which I thought was beautiful, not par with the original, of course, but NO sequel has had better music than the original. Official backstory on Ariel and her life before the original (that is if you're like me and consider the sequels canon). And beautiful animation, of course, not everyone thinks that, but I do.![]()
And when it comes down to the whole TLM3/Cindy3 debate, would you compare the original The Little Mermaid and Cinderella? Two different, but lovely films. And even though TLM3 hasn' t come out, I hope and think that TLM3 and Cindy3 will also be two different, but lovely films... whileTLM2andCindy2willbetwosimilarnastydisgustingyuckpiecesofcrap.