No More Tinker Bell Movie??

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Clochette
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:10 pm

Post by Clochette »

goofystitch wrote:He left his carriage when his parents were discussing what he would be when he grew up
In fact, this is also from "Hook". In the book, he flies out of the window when he is just several days old.

In my edition, is says "Tinker Bell".
"To Love A Human Being Means To See The Face Of God"

"To Die Would Be An Awfully Big Adventure"

"I Do Believe In Fairies"
mariadny
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:06 pm

Post by mariadny »

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS¡¡¡¡¡¡
NO more sequels, I'm HAPPYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY :D :D :D
User avatar
wrestling_stat
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:48 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Post by wrestling_stat »

I'm not so sure they would cancel this movie. On the Peter Pan: PE there is a preview of the new movie Tinker Bell where Tink has to save all the Faeries, not her as a little girl.
<i>You are allowed one signature image up to 500 pixels in width and 100 pixels in height. </i>
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d200/ ... banner.jpg
goofystitch
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Walt Disney World

Post by goofystitch »

I'd say it is safe to say that some form of "Tinker Bell" will get released, no matter what. According to Jim Hill (I know, he isn't always correct, but he is right about alot), 80% of the movie was fully animated when they decided to make many changes that would require more than half of that version to be thrown out and re-animated. Production is reportedly on hold while story elements are reworked, but even if the creative forces can't come to some form of an agreement, I'm pretty sure they would at least finish the remaining 20% of animation and put out a DVD. I mean, this thing will sell big even if it stinks. Look at how well "Cinderella II" sold. Disney stock holders wouldn't allow the company to pass up that kind of revenue. Tink is arguably one of Disney's most popular and marketable characters. Go to Wal Mart and look at the girls pajama pants. One in 5 pairs is Tinker Bell.
I'm currently watching and reviewing every Disney film in chronological order. You can follow along at my blog, The Disney Films, and also follow me on Twitter.
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

goofystitch wrote:I'd say it is safe to say that some form of "Tinker Bell" will get released, no matter what. According to Jim Hill (I know, he isn't always correct, but he is right about alot), 80% of the movie was fully animated when they decided to make many changes that would require more than half of that version to be thrown out and re-animated. Production is reportedly on hold while story elements are reworked, but even if the creative forces can't come to some form of an agreement, I'm pretty sure they would at least finish the remaining 20% of animation and put out a DVD. I mean, this thing will sell big even if it stinks. Look at how well "Cinderella II" sold. Disney stock holders wouldn't allow the company to pass up that kind of revenue. Tink is arguably one of Disney's most popular and marketable characters. Go to Wal Mart and look at the girls pajama pants. One in 5 pairs is Tinker Bell.
I have to agree totally. I did finally see that new trailer on the Peter Pan DVD, and I have to admit that I was disappointed, but still interested as a hardcore Tink fan. The trailer looked to me like yet another film in the line of the Barbie DVDs, Winx Club, Bratz, etc..., but I think Disney found a solid way to get into that valuable arena too, and I don't think they'll pass up on it, especially after having such a finished looking preview out. I definitely much preferred the old preview though. At this point though, I'm not even convinced they're going to do much retooling of what they already have though. It would probably take a heck of a lot to "fix" it, and, like I said, I don't think they're going to totally scrap the project. In the end, I'm sure they will agree this is just a direct to video money-maker (sadly), and doesn't have to be held up to such high standards as one expects from Big Screen Disney. Of course, I don't agree with that outlook, but they've already got a history of that sort of outlook, and in the end I don't think they will feel that one more such film will make such a difference. Anyways, first they need to worry about getting their big screen releases on the right track again. Most people will see a direct-to-video movie as just more Fairies merchandise anyway. Though, it'd be great if they could improve it.
Post Reply