Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
Does anyone know why Disney decided to abandoned the flap for the slipcase on the Lady and the Tramp platinum edition? I think its stupid that they did this because I thought it was cool that on the previous releases you could open up the flap and see whats where etc.
I really hope Disney doesnt do this with Little Mermaid, that DVD is one of the most anticipated DVD's and it should get the best treatment, including packaging.
I really hope Disney doesnt do this with Little Mermaid, that DVD is one of the most anticipated DVD's and it should get the best treatment, including packaging.
- Escapay
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
- Contact:
Re: Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
Because it was as unnecessary as the slipcover itself?Salkat89 wrote:Does anyone know why Disney decided to abandoned the flap for the slipcase on the Lady and the Tramp platinum edition?

Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
-
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
- Contact:
- Robin Hood
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:55 pm
- Location: Canada
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
I humbly suggest a class action on behalf of all Disney fans that felt cheated by the clear lack of direction from Disney.
The decision has left us flapless and alone in a cold, cold world.
It is a violation of the memory of Walt Disney, who always said: "I take great pride in the artistic development of slipcovers. Our DVDs are made to go through emotions which a few short years ago would have seemed impossible to secure with a round and shiny disc. Some of the art produced in the finished DVD slipcover of today is more graceful than anything possible for a human to do."
Not only that, but think of the children.
For shame, Disney, for SHAME.
The decision has left us flapless and alone in a cold, cold world.
It is a violation of the memory of Walt Disney, who always said: "I take great pride in the artistic development of slipcovers. Our DVDs are made to go through emotions which a few short years ago would have seemed impossible to secure with a round and shiny disc. Some of the art produced in the finished DVD slipcover of today is more graceful than anything possible for a human to do."
Not only that, but think of the children.
For shame, Disney, for SHAME.

Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
- Escapay
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
- Contact:
So does the actual CASE...Bebopgroove wrote:I really like the idea of the slip-cover. They're very good at protecting the disc from shelf-wear.
Slipcovers are like condoms, bound to tear if not handled correctly and protects less than one expects. The only difference is that condoms can be necessary at times, while slipcovers never are.
Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
So you should only use slipcovers once, roll them from the base and pinch the top to create a reservoir tip for the DVDs?Escapay wrote:Slipcovers are like condoms, bound to tear if not handled correctly and protects less than one expects. The only difference is that condoms can be necessary at times, while slipcovers never are.
I suppose some slipcovers are embossed, which is kind of like being ribbed...
Have I taken the analogy too far?

Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
-
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
- Contact:
BAH!!! I meant "they protect the case from shelf-wear". I didn't actually mean "disc".Escapay wrote:So does the actual CASE...Bebopgroove wrote:I really like the idea of the slip-cover. They're very good at protecting the disc from shelf-wear.
Escapay wrote:Slipcovers are like condoms, bound to tear if not handled correctly and protects less than one expects. The only difference is that condoms can be necessary at times, while slipcovers never are.













I'm sorry, but the idea of comparing slip-covers to condoms is just....too funny...
<a href="http://goldenlemonsicons.blogspot.com">GoldenLemons Icons</a> | <a href="http://bebopgroove.dvdaf.com">My DVD Collection</a>
-
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4676
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
- Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
- Contact:
Not far enough I fear!Loomis wrote:So you should only use slipcovers once, roll them from the base and pinch the top to create a reservoir tip for the DVDs?Escapay wrote:Slipcovers are like condoms, bound to tear if not handled correctly and protects less than one expects. The only difference is that condoms can be necessary at times, while slipcovers never are.
I suppose some slipcovers are embossed, which is kind of like being ribbed...
Have I taken the analogy too far?
I think it must be stressed that unprotected DVDs can lead to teen DVD reproduction and unwanted illegal copying!
Also, when you've finished with the slipcover, you must never flush it!

- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
I expect that next time I go to Disneyland, there will be slipcover dispensers in all of the restroom, promoting safe DVD usage.ichabod wrote:Not far enough I fear!Loomis wrote: So you should only use slipcovers once, roll them from the base and pinch the top to create a reservoir tip for the DVDs?
I suppose some slipcovers are embossed, which is kind of like being ribbed...
Have I taken the analogy too far?
I think it must be stressed that unprotected DVDs can lead to teen DVD reproduction and unwanted illegal copying!
Also, when you've finished with the slipcover, you must never flush it!
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
- The Lizard King
- Special Edition
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:22 pm
Re: Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
Because all of the classics that are based on a BOOK have the flap. Look at the recent Narnia 2-disc CE. It has a flap, too, because it was adapted from C. S. Lewis' BOOK.Salkat89 wrote:Does anyone know why Disney decided to abandoned the flap for the slipcase on the Lady and the Tramp platinum edition?
Since it is based on the Hans Christian Andersen BOOK, it will more than likely have a flap.Salkat89 wrote:I really hope Disney doesnt do this with Little Mermaid, that DVD is one of the most anticipated DVD's and it should get the best treatment, including packaging.
HTH,
TLK

-
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
-
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5263
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ohio, United States of America
Re: Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
The Lion King wasn't based on a book.The Lizard King wrote:Because all of the classics that are based on a BOOK have the flap. Look at the recent Narnia 2-disc CE. It has a flap, too, because it was adapted from C. S. Lewis' BOOK.Salkat89 wrote:Does anyone know why Disney decided to abandoned the flap for the slipcase on the Lady and the Tramp platinum edition?
Since it is based on the Hans Christian Andersen BOOK, it will more than likely have a flap.Salkat89 wrote:I really hope Disney doesnt do this with Little Mermaid, that DVD is one of the most anticipated DVD's and it should get the best treatment, including packaging.
HTH,
TLK
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
- The Lizard King
- Special Edition
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:22 pm
Re: Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
You've never heard of Shakespeare's Hamlet? It was a BOOK!TheSequelofDisney wrote:The Lion King wasn't based on a book.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lion_King
TLK

-
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
-
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
- Contact:
Well Tarzan was based on a book, and it didn't get a flap. Explain that to me.The Lizard King wrote:Because all of the classics that are based on a BOOK have the flap. Look at the recent Narnia 2-disc CE. It has a flap, too, because it was adapted from C. S. Lewis' BOOK.Salkat89 wrote:Does anyone know why Disney decided to abandoned the flap for the slipcase on the Lady and the Tramp platinum edition?
Since it is based on the Hans Christian Andersen BOOK, it will more than likely have a flap.Salkat89 wrote:I really hope Disney doesnt do this with Little Mermaid, that DVD is one of the most anticipated DVD's and it should get the best treatment, including packaging.
HTH,
TLK
Treasure Planet was based on a book, and it got absolutely nothing.
And Hamlet wasn't really a book. It was a play. Same with Romeo and Juliet.
<a href="http://goldenlemonsicons.blogspot.com">GoldenLemons Icons</a> | <a href="http://bebopgroove.dvdaf.com">My DVD Collection</a>
- Escapay
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
- Contact:
When Tarzan first came out (in the single disc and two-disc release), they didn't use slipcovers yet. and by the time it came back in its hackjob single-disc Not-So-Special-Edition, it had been assumed that slipcovers would have flaps only if it were a Platinum title, or a title that was based on a book (thus, Sleeping Beauty, Alice in Wonderland, and Mary Poppins getting flaps, and oddly, the Lion King sequels just because it was a sequel to a platinum). And yet, Mulan, which came a few months before Mary Poppins, didn't get a flap. So basically in 2005 it was assumed/established/decided that only Platinums now would get flaps, which of course was proven wrong this year with Lady and the Tramp.Bebopgroove wrote:Well Tarzan was based on a book, and it didn't get a flap. Explain that to me.The Lizard King wrote: Because all of the classics that are based on a BOOK have the flap. Look at the recent Narnia 2-disc CE. It has a flap, too, because it was adapted from C. S. Lewis' BOOK.
Since it is based on the Hans Christian Andersen BOOK, it will more than likely have a flap.
HTH,
TLK
Treasure Planet was based on a book, and it got absolutely nothing.
And Hamlet wasn't really a book. It was a play. Same with Romeo and Juliet.
Treasure Planet's single-disc release came when only two-disc sets would get slipcovers, which is why it didn't get a slipcvoer. And ironically, when Brother Bear came out, it didn't get a slipcover either.
Hamlet may have not been a book, but The Lion King was a Platinum title, so it got a flap.
How sad is it that one who despises slipcovers so much knows so much about the buggers?
Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
Re: Lady and the Tramp, no front flap?
Technically, it was PLAY but then I'd just be mincing words.The Lizard King wrote:You've never heard of Shakespeare's Hamlet? It was a BOOK!TheSequelofDisney wrote:The Lion King wasn't based on a book.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lion_King
TLK
Besides, wasn't it based on Kimba the White Lion

Trying to work out Disney DVD logic is like trying to stuff an elephant into a suitcase. Even if you do come up with something, there is no airport in the world that will let you take it on with you.
Ok, forget that analogy.
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
-
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3675
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm
Actually, believe it or not, those "cheapquels" were based on plays as well!Escapay wrote:(thus, Sleeping Beauty, Alice in Wonderland, and Mary Poppins getting flaps, and oddly, the Lion King sequels just because it was a sequel to a platinum).
The Lion King 1 1/2 was based on the Shakespearean play "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" while "The Lion Kings 2: Simba's Pride" was based on "Romeo and Juliet".