Disney's 2D Animation is officially Dead? DisneyToon Studios
-
castleinthesky
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 12:21 pm
- Location: Laputa
- DreamerQ18
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 7:41 pm
- Location: Daytona Beach Florida
- Contact:
Wow it never fails when I go missing for a long time I always come back to such bad news
. I have never been all for making sequals to every aniemated classic and I can admitt that there have been a few good ones. I guess I am just sad because it was starting to feel like the sequals were getting so much better, plots and art and now its ending.
Also I am not all that impressed with the whole CGI movement
Mickey's Twice upon an X-mas was a dissapointment to me. I wish we could have both 2-D and CGI and well everything but as always just wishful thinking but who knows maybe we will be able too. And I guess I should not be to upset maybe the studio in Tokyo will be okay... right 
Also I am not all that impressed with the whole CGI movement
Disney... Laughter is timeless. Imagination has no age. And dreams are Forever
- Pasta67
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: On The Forums... Duh!
Yes, we get what you mean. You said the exact same thing twice already.Teede wrote:Well at least they can make 3D sequels to the Disney classics. If you know what I mean.
I'm not all excited to making CGI sequels to traditionally drawn animated classics. In my opinion, you lose the entire feel of the first movie when you make a change that big.
- John
- Pasta67
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: On The Forums... Duh!
Teede wrote:They're gonna make a sequels to the animated classics in 3D? Wow!
Teede wrote:Uh? Hello? Can anybody hear me? I said they're gonna make the sequels to Disney classics in 3D? Wow!
Teede wrote:Well at least they can make 3D sequels to the Disney classics. If you know what I mean.
Good lord, like a friggin' broken record. It's actually quite funny.Teede wrote:Well it's just that they're making CGI sequels to Disney classics like a CGI sequel to The Great Mouse Detective and stuff and all.
It may not sound like it, but I always enjoy it when Teede stops by.
Last edited by Pasta67 on Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- John
No, I gotta say that 1. 1 post is the best. I mean that's greater than 0. Am I right, check my math? I think that's right.Isidour wrote:yeah, the 600´s are sweet, but the 2000 are sweeter!![]()
![]()
Tedee, should be really happy of a sequel in 3D of an originally 2D classic?
I think not, because isn´t just the same
Anyways, I don't really care I lost my faith in the Disney company a long time ago. So I say just let them do whatever the hell they want. If they wanna ruin a classic with these dumb sequels then let them, you don't have to watch them. I don't have to watch them so really there's no reason why I should complain about it.
-
drnilescrane
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:48 am
I'm surprised this report doesn't mention that the studio is working on Bambi II. I assume this means the work is now complete.
No mention of some of the other rumoured sequels either - No Fox and the Hound II and no Mulan II (and, thankfully no further Pooh feature).
Of course, as has been pointed out, this doesn't mean 2D is dead, they're just going to do it out-of-house for less money. A shame, as I was a keen defender of the sequels and DisneyToon's improving work. Now, I to am disillisioned.
When it comes down to it, if Disney really want to save money, but have high DVD sales, they don't need to make any sequels, just release some of their TV Toons on DVD. (Such as House of Mouse hint hint). I really can't understand Disney's thinking on this - they sit on literally millions of dollars of archive material, but they still want to make video sequels (only without spending the money). Madness.
No mention of some of the other rumoured sequels either - No Fox and the Hound II and no Mulan II (and, thankfully no further Pooh feature).
Of course, as has been pointed out, this doesn't mean 2D is dead, they're just going to do it out-of-house for less money. A shame, as I was a keen defender of the sequels and DisneyToon's improving work. Now, I to am disillisioned.
When it comes down to it, if Disney really want to save money, but have high DVD sales, they don't need to make any sequels, just release some of their TV Toons on DVD. (Such as House of Mouse hint hint). I really can't understand Disney's thinking on this - they sit on literally millions of dollars of archive material, but they still want to make video sequels (only without spending the money). Madness.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
- magicalwands
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:24 am
- Location: Gusteau's Restaurant
- TM2-Megatron
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I hope somebody starts a new studio using all these animators that Disney seems to be discarding; and maybe teach Disney something about making good movies. There doesn't seem to be anyone left at the company that knows anything about it.
Last edited by TM2-Megatron on Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Raydawggie
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:21 pm
Yeah, I hope that tooTM2-Megatron wrote:I hope somebody starts a new studio using all these animators that Disney seems to be discarding;
it would be terrific, and they certanly be the spirit of the real Disney, not the one that make cheapqueels and forget so easily its origins, but the one that Walt once made
