Hunchback 2 definitely the worst.
Now about Tarzan and Jane, if it hadn't been advertised as a sequel, it wouldn't be that bad. If it had been advertised as a collection of episodes (a la Kim Possible: The Secret Files), I'm sure no one would have a problem with it.
And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
Again, same goes for Atlantis: Milo's Return, and Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World.
The Worst Disney Sequel!
- Prince Adam
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: The Great, Wide Somewhere (Ont, Canada)
I heard it was going to be a Disney Princess multi-part 'block'. Two or three segments would air each showing, rotating the 'stars'. Disney have six characters in their Princessrange I think (Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel, Belle and Pocahontas).Prince Adam wrote:And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
So brace yourselves for 5 more 'sequels'
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
- Prince Phillip
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 11:48 am
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Agreed. I think it is so stupid to package TV series episodes as a sequel, and why the need to make sdo many tv series after sequels... IMO they are just as cheapening to the first as any sequel would be...Prince Adam wrote:Now about Tarzan and Jane, if it hadn't been advertised as a sequel, it wouldn't be that bad. If it had been advertised as a collection of episodes (a la Kim Possible: The Secret Files), I'm sure no one would have a problem with it.
And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
Again, same goes for Atlantis: Milo's Return, and Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World.
Now because of Stitch! and TandJ they are releasing Lilo and Stitch 2 (The real seaquel) and Tarzan II (the real sequel) why not just release the "real" sequel in the first place instead of confusing the audience more than they are already...
Cinderella 2 should have never been made in the first place, just as Snow White 2 shouldn't be being made, and hopefully they will never make a Sleeping Beauty 2... A Sequel Should NEVER be Made to a Movie that ends "Happily Ever After".
I understand the sequels were made for quick cash or something but I think it is time that they were all vaulted indefinately...
If they are truely serious about a sequel and think they can make it work, and they think there is a need for a sequel, let them utilize the resources time and effort to make it a feature/classic, as they did with Rescuers DU, and let it be original and stand alone just as Rescuers did...
Defy Gravity
-
Captain Hook
- Special Edition
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:16 am
Didn't they already make a Beauty and the Beast TV series like sequel "Belle's Magical World"?2099net wrote:I heard it was going to be a Disney Princess multi-part 'block'. Two or three segments would air each showing, rotating the 'stars'. Disney have six characters in their Princessrange I think (Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel, Belle and Pocahontas).Prince Adam wrote:And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
So brace yourselves for 5 more 'sequels'
- Joe Carioca
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:05 pm
- Location: Brazil
"Cinderella II", "Belle's Magical World" and "Tarzan & Jane" are the worst Disney I've seen so far...
I haven't seen "101 Dalmatians 2" and "Jungle Book II" and I definetly don't intend to. So, I picked "Tarzan & Jane". "Pocahontas II" is also bad, specially since I love the original so much... the same for "Atlantis II", though I think it could have been a nice TV series, it doesn't work as a feature film.
I haven't seen "101 Dalmatians 2" and "Jungle Book II" and I definetly don't intend to. So, I picked "Tarzan & Jane". "Pocahontas II" is also bad, specially since I love the original so much... the same for "Atlantis II", though I think it could have been a nice TV series, it doesn't work as a feature film.
-
Captain Hook
- Special Edition
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:16 am
Some are good, as I've said before... er... I only like Jungle Book 2 and Neverland, socatNC wrote:maybe i shouldn't have this opinion, but from anything anybody has ever said about disney sequels, i have subconciously made it a point in my mind to not watch a disney sequel... just the thought of a sequel makes me shudder.. oooooh creepy