The Worst Disney Sequel!

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.

Which is the worst disney sequel ever???????

The Jungle Book II
4
31%
Atlantis: Milo's Return
0
No votes
Tarzan and Jane
7
54%
101 Dalmations II: Patch's London Adventure
0
No votes
Pochahontas II: Journey to a New World
2
15%
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
Prince Adam
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: The Great, Wide Somewhere (Ont, Canada)

Post by Prince Adam »

Hunchback 2 definitely the worst.
Now about Tarzan and Jane, if it hadn't been advertised as a sequel, it wouldn't be that bad. If it had been advertised as a collection of episodes (a la Kim Possible: The Secret Files), I'm sure no one would have a problem with it.

And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.

Again, same goes for Atlantis: Milo's Return, and Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World.
Defy Gravity...
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Prince Adam wrote:And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
I heard it was going to be a Disney Princess multi-part 'block'. Two or three segments would air each showing, rotating the 'stars'. Disney have six characters in their Princessrange I think (Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel, Belle and Pocahontas).

So brace yourselves for 5 more 'sequels' :)
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Prince Phillip
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Prince Phillip »

Prince Adam wrote:Now about Tarzan and Jane, if it hadn't been advertised as a sequel, it wouldn't be that bad. If it had been advertised as a collection of episodes (a la Kim Possible: The Secret Files), I'm sure no one would have a problem with it.

And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.

Again, same goes for Atlantis: Milo's Return, and Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World.
Agreed. I think it is so stupid to package TV series episodes as a sequel, and why the need to make sdo many tv series after sequels... IMO they are just as cheapening to the first as any sequel would be...

Now because of Stitch! and TandJ they are releasing Lilo and Stitch 2 (The real seaquel) and Tarzan II (the real sequel) why not just release the "real" sequel in the first place instead of confusing the audience more than they are already... :roll:

Cinderella 2 should have never been made in the first place, just as Snow White 2 shouldn't be being made, and hopefully they will never make a Sleeping Beauty 2... A Sequel Should NEVER be Made to a Movie that ends "Happily Ever After".

I understand the sequels were made for quick cash or something but I think it is time that they were all vaulted indefinately...

If they are truely serious about a sequel and think they can make it work, and they think there is a need for a sequel, let them utilize the resources time and effort to make it a feature/classic, as they did with Rescuers DU, and let it be original and stand alone just as Rescuers did...
Defy Gravity
Captain Hook
Special Edition
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:16 am

Post by Captain Hook »

2099net wrote:
Prince Adam wrote:And as for Cinderella 2, the same applys. There were rumours of a Cinderella TV series, and that the segments of "Dreams Come True" were actually the first 3 episodes. Again, if it had been advertised as such, and without the "2" in the title, it would have been fine.
I heard it was going to be a Disney Princess multi-part 'block'. Two or three segments would air each showing, rotating the 'stars'. Disney have six characters in their Princessrange I think (Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel, Belle and Pocahontas).

So brace yourselves for 5 more 'sequels' :)
Didn't they already make a Beauty and the Beast TV series like sequel "Belle's Magical World"?
User avatar
Joe Carioca
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2039
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:05 pm
Location: Brazil

Post by Joe Carioca »

"Cinderella II", "Belle's Magical World" and "Tarzan & Jane" are the worst Disney I've seen so far...
I haven't seen "101 Dalmatians 2" and "Jungle Book II" and I definetly don't intend to. So, I picked "Tarzan & Jane". "Pocahontas II" is also bad, specially since I love the original so much... the same for "Atlantis II", though I think it could have been a nice TV series, it doesn't work as a feature film.
User avatar
catNC
Special Edition
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 8:04 pm
Contact:

Post by catNC »

maybe i shouldn't have this opinion, but from anything anybody has ever said about disney sequels, i have subconciously made it a point in my mind to not watch a disney sequel... just the thought of a sequel makes me shudder.. oooooh creepy :P
Captain Hook
Special Edition
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:16 am

Post by Captain Hook »

catNC wrote:maybe i shouldn't have this opinion, but from anything anybody has ever said about disney sequels, i have subconciously made it a point in my mind to not watch a disney sequel... just the thought of a sequel makes me shudder.. oooooh creepy :P
Some are good, as I've said before... er... I only like Jungle Book 2 and Neverland, so :lol: I guess I agree with no DTV movies. I didn't really like Rescuers Down Under though... no offense Loomis! :D
Post Reply