Nine NEW pictures from "Tarzan II"
Now, as you know, I defendd the sequels (in principle) but admit most are disappointing to various extents (in practice). In fact the only sequels I do think are more than just diversions are Return to Never Land, and to a slightly lesser extent Scamp's Adventure. I actually think The Lion King 1.5 is a rather poor film, and mostly pointless (but I do like the opening when it is not having to stick to the Lion King storyline).
Anyhow, I am totally perplexed why Disney is doing a midquel for Tarzan. The Tarzan legacy is huge - absolutely huge, and Disney had so many opportunities to pick from, I just cannot fathom they they are going for Young Tarzan.
From a quick poll of my daughter and some of her friends, nobody wants to see Young Tarzan*. They want to see old Tarzan having "grown up" adventures, and "fighting lions and tigers and giant snakes".
* These were all girls. Perhaps young boys do identify more with Young Tarzan.
			
			
									
						
							Anyhow, I am totally perplexed why Disney is doing a midquel for Tarzan. The Tarzan legacy is huge - absolutely huge, and Disney had so many opportunities to pick from, I just cannot fathom they they are going for Young Tarzan.
From a quick poll of my daughter and some of her friends, nobody wants to see Young Tarzan*. They want to see old Tarzan having "grown up" adventures, and "fighting lions and tigers and giant snakes".
* These were all girls. Perhaps young boys do identify more with Young Tarzan.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
			
						- 
				ichabod
 - Diamond Edition
 - Posts: 4676
 - Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
 - Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
 - Contact:
 
I agree Netty, I would much rather have seen a Sequel featuring adult Tarzan and Jane. Young Tarzan has absolutely no hook for me! It would indeed have made a far more interesting and probably a more valid sequel!
I expect Disney's main thinking is that Young Tarzan will probably be more attractive to the wee ones. Also they probably feel they've covered adult Tarzan with the TV series and the previous "Tarzan and Jane" film.
Idiots!
			
			
									
						
										
						I expect Disney's main thinking is that Young Tarzan will probably be more attractive to the wee ones. Also they probably feel they've covered adult Tarzan with the TV series and the previous "Tarzan and Jane" film.
Idiots!
Updated the first post with 4 new stills from the film itself. Artistically, these are more compelling. But thematically, they don't exactly have me swinging and beating my chest. More to come.
			
			
									
						
							"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
			
						RJKD23 wrote:well, TARZAN II looks like a better animation than Tarzan & Jane
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
			
						- Sailor Eric
 - Gold Classic Collection
 - Posts: 236
 - Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:13 pm
 - Location: Mexico
 
- 
				ichabod
 - Diamond Edition
 - Posts: 4676
 - Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
 - Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
 - Contact:
 
Well when I first saw those first 2 stills I was severely unimpressed. However I have to say that these new stills are of a much better quality in my opinion. I think they show off how good the animation and the effects will be.
Hopefully the majority of the movie will look like as good as the latter.
			
			
									
						
										
						Hopefully the majority of the movie will look like as good as the latter.
3 more...
<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b5.jpg">
Terk, Tarzan, and the baby apes enjoy a rumble in the jungle.
<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b6.jpg">
A frightened hippopotamus runs through Dark Mountain after hearing the cry of the dreaded "monster" Zugor.
<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b7.jpg">
Tarzan leaves his "family" behind and sets off to find who he is. Ribbit!
Tarzan II Links
Press Release
Preorder
			
			
													<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b5.jpg">
Terk, Tarzan, and the baby apes enjoy a rumble in the jungle.
<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b6.jpg">
A frightened hippopotamus runs through Dark Mountain after hearing the cry of the dreaded "monster" Zugor.
<img src="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/t-v/tarz2b7.jpg">
Tarzan leaves his "family" behind and sets off to find who he is. Ribbit!
Tarzan II Links
Press Release
Preorder
					Last edited by Luke on Mon Apr 11, 2005 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
						
							"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
			
						- Disney-Fan
 - Platinum Edition
 - Posts: 3381
 - Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
 - Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
 - Contact:
 
- Sailor Eric
 - Gold Classic Collection
 - Posts: 236
 - Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:13 pm
 - Location: Mexico
 
- 
				Simba Kimball
 - Member
 - Posts: 3
 - Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:26 pm
 
The look in these newer stills is much better than the earlier two.  I concur with the opinions about young Tarzan being less interesting.  Looks like it will bore me as a filmgoer, but possibly entertain me as an animation enthusiast.
I can't help but think that there would be more animation-value in having an older Tarzan, fighting creatures and 'tree-surfing' in deep-canvas(or the lower grade Disneytoon equivalent). Those were the best things in the original film, and it seems like they're leaving out every good thing that film had to offer.
I agree that the frog gag looks dumb, and I also think the frog design is weak.
			
			
									
						
										
						I can't help but think that there would be more animation-value in having an older Tarzan, fighting creatures and 'tree-surfing' in deep-canvas(or the lower grade Disneytoon equivalent). Those were the best things in the original film, and it seems like they're leaving out every good thing that film had to offer.
I agree that the frog gag looks dumb, and I also think the frog design is weak.
- 
				PatrickvD
 - Signature Collection
 - Posts: 5207
 - Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
 - Location: The Netherlands
 
what the heck are these characters on??? seriously.. 
This one in particular freaked me out
			
			
									
						
										
						This one in particular freaked me out
Although the animation looks fine. I'm kind of dissapointed the backgrounds fail to live up to the originals background. Stitch has a glitch does appear to live up. This one sadly does not. Thos midquel story better be really good.
Well, to compare the style from the sequel to the original movie I have pasted the Tarzan II young Tarzan on the original young Tarzan from a screenshot of the original movie. This is the result:

Yes, Tarzan II is way lighter than the original movie so I had to darken Tarzan a little to fit in... But would you really notice it?
			
			
									
						
							
Yes, Tarzan II is way lighter than the original movie so I had to darken Tarzan a little to fit in... But would you really notice it?
The Disney Database - All the Disney magic in 1 site!
			
						- 
				PatrickvD
 - Signature Collection
 - Posts: 5207
 - Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
 - Location: The Netherlands
 
I'm serious when I say I do. The lightning used in DTV's often reminds me of... plastic.Jens wrote:Well, to compare the style from the sequel to the original movie I have pasted the Tarzan II young Tarzan on the original young Tarzan from a screenshot of the original movie. This is the result:
Yes, Tarzan II is way lighter than the original movie so I had to darken Tarzan a little to fit in... But would you really notice it?
nice comparison though, thanks for sharing

 R[