Luke! Use thine powers and cast away the evil before my eyes

ichabod · Post by **ichabod** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:30 am

It's evil I tell youe Evil! It's sacrilege!

You should sue!

orestes. · Post by **orestes.** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:12 am

Meh, I heard the movie was a lot of fun.

RJKD23 · Post by **RJKD23** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:32 am

Don't you remember seeing those other Dreamworks movies sponsored on this site by those Google Ads?!

Post by **Luke** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:33 am

I vaguely remember an ad or two (hundred) for <i>The Ring Two</i>. Will have to add this to the unacceptable advertisers list on Google!

ichabod · Post by **ichabod** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:11 am

Luke wrote:I vaguely remember an ad or two (hundred) for <i>The Ring Two</i>. Will have to add this to the unacceptable advertisers list on Google!

Excellent!

And At Least the Ring 2 is not animated competition for Dreamworks!

I have no real problem with dreamworks in theory, but I still don't think a Disney site should be encouraging Dreamworks love!

AwallaceUNC · Post by **AwallaceUNC** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:15 am

Dreamworks is fine. It's Dreamworks Animation that's the problem. Hopefully SG will ship off K soon and we won't have to worry anymore.

-Aaron

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm

why does anyone care what google advertises on the site? Its whats on the site that counts, not on the ads.

Post by **Luke** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:28 pm

Alan wrote:why does anyone care what google advertises on the site? Its whats on the site that counts, not on the ads.

Very true. And if no one clicks the ads, then there is no site! Wheeeee!

AwallaceUNC · Post by **AwallaceUNC** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:56 pm

Alan wrote:why does anyone care what google advertises on the site? Its whats on the site that counts, not on the ads.

But what's on the ads is on the site. And what's on the site determines what's on the ads. It's a never-ending circle, man.

-Aaron

MickeyMousePal · Post by **MickeyMousePal** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:11 pm

Luke should do one thing and one thing only sue there buts...

deathie mouse · Post by **deathie mouse** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:11 pm

These buts were made for walking
for walking all over you

Isidour · Post by **Isidour** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:04 pm

don´t you mean boots?

RJKD23 · Post by **RJKD23** » Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:55 am

no, he means butts with a double t.

Isidour · Post by **Isidour** » Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:57 am

for walking?

I only knew that the red man of "Cow & Chicken"(ye old times) could do that...but seems funny to walk whit those

RJKD23 · Post by **RJKD23** » Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:12 am

Isidour wrote:for walking?

I only knew that the red man of "Cow & Chicken"(ye old times) could do that...but seems funny to walk whit those

typos...tsk tsk.

----------------
Actually, Alan, I "care" what's on the google ads because when that RING 2 ad kept popping up @ my "time to click for today", I made sure not to click it because I hate scary movies.

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

Luke! Use thine powers and cast away the evil before my eyes

Luke! Use thine powers and cast away the evil before my eyes