Disney Bloopers
Disney Bloopers
While watching "Beauty and the Beast" I realised something.
The Beast has ten years to find love, which he must do before his 21st birthday. When he does transform at the end of the film, he appears to be 21, meaning he was 11 when he was cursed. When Chip the cup transforms, he appears to be about 4 years old.
Making him -6 when he was cursed. Ooops!
I also watched "Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas" and it shows him as 11 years old. In "Beauty and the Beast" he shreds a portrait of himself in which he looks 21...
Oh-er.
Anyone notice any other bloopers?
The Beast has ten years to find love, which he must do before his 21st birthday. When he does transform at the end of the film, he appears to be 21, meaning he was 11 when he was cursed. When Chip the cup transforms, he appears to be about 4 years old.
Making him -6 when he was cursed. Ooops!
I also watched "Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas" and it shows him as 11 years old. In "Beauty and the Beast" he shreds a portrait of himself in which he looks 21...
Oh-er.
Anyone notice any other bloopers?
Last edited by oh_bother on Mon May 02, 2005 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oh_Bother
------------
F, 23 (on Thursday)
- Disney-Fan
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
- Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
- Contact:
Re: Disney Bloopers
Yeah, the filmmakers really should have thought that through a little more. I think I might know one or two other bloopers in Disney films, but I can't think of any right now.oh_bother wrote:While watching "Beauty and the Beast" I released something.
The Beast has ten years to find love, which he must do before his 21st birthday. When he does transform at the end of the film, he appears to be 21, meaning he was 11 when he was cursed. When Chip the cup transforms, he appears to be about 4 years old.
Making him -6 when he was cursed. Ooops!
I also watched "Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas" and it shows him as 11 years old. In "Beauty and the Beast" he shreds a portrait of himself in which he looks 21.
Haha. I've had the same thought before. I even discussed it with my mom who is a huge BATB fan. The discussion only went around in circles, leaving me horribly confused, so I just dropped the topic. 
<a href="http://www.TickerFactory.com/">
<img border="0" src="http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt/d/ ... t.png"></a>
<img border="0" src="http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt/d/ ... t.png"></a>
-
Timon/Pumbaa fan
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3675
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm
- pinkrenata
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:33 pm
- Location: Mini Van Highway
- Contact:
Well, since the castle has been put under an enchantment, it's very plausible that time within the castle doesn't work quite the same. Ten years in the world outside could very possibly equal out to be only a few castle years. I doubt the creators of the film thought this out, but I still think it makes a logical explanation.
Come to think of it, there's a little something else that I find a bit more disturbing. Who in the world is Chip's father? Perhaps that would make for an interesting direct-to-video sequel?
Come to think of it, there's a little something else that I find a bit more disturbing. Who in the world is Chip's father? Perhaps that would make for an interesting direct-to-video sequel?
WIST #1 (The pinkrenata Edition) -- Kram Nebuer: *mouth full of Oreos* Why do you have a picture of Bobby Driscoll?
"I'm a nudist!" - Tommy Kirk
"I'm a nudist!" - Tommy Kirk
-
Mr._Skipperdoo
- Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 1:47 pm
- Location: Earth
Fish also dont talk. But I dont believe this is a "blooper". I think Pixar put this into the movie to make the fish feel more believable.oh_bother wrote:In "Finding Nemo", the fish blink. Fish do not have eyelids.
But the Mary Poppins thing is cool. I think I heard that the robin contained tons of wires that had to run through Julie's costume. Also, I think it is actually Julie's whistling used for the robin that was pre-recorded before the shoot.
- Disney-Fan
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
- Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
- Contact:
- JiminyCrick91
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3930
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:39 pm
- Location: ont. canada
- Contact:
-
Sunset Girl
Yeah, there was a similar debate about Winnie the Pooh, actually. Some people felt that the stuffed animal characters shouldn't blink to make them feel more like stuffed animals, but the winning argument was that they'd have no life to them without that simple act.goofy108 wrote:Fish also dont talk. But I dont believe this is a "blooper". I think Pixar put this into the movie to make the fish feel more believable.oh_bother wrote:In "Finding Nemo", the fish blink. Fish do not have eyelids.
But the Mary Poppins thing is cool. I think I heard that the robin contained tons of wires that had to run through Julie's costume. Also, I think it is actually Julie's whistling used for the robin that was pre-recorded before the shoot.
In other words, it's normal to twist facts around and use a bit of artistic license to improve the story and characters. And besides, not letting them blink would be kinda creepy!
And yes, that was Julie's whistling for the part of the mechanical robin.
-
ichabod
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4676
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
- Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
- Contact:
Re: Disney Bloopers
we all have that problem when we're scared!oh_bother wrote:While watching "Beauty and the Beast" I released something.
R[