Jungle Book 2 - a Classic?

Billy Moon · Post by **Billy Moon** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 12:59 am

Did you notice that The Jungle Book 2 is released as part of the Walt Disney Classics in Europe?
What is the logic behind this?

KinOO · Post by **KinOO** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 1:41 am

Yes it's a shame that it has the word "Classic on this piece of unimagination. But in Europe yuo got to differenciate the classics which regroup the sequels and others productions and the "Grands Classiques" which regroups the real classics form WDFA like Treasure Planet, Lilo and Stitch. The Platinum are called "Chef-d'oeuvres" in France.

2099net · Post by **2099net** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 1:59 am

Are you saying it's not a classic Billy?

I never bother about the Disney titles myself - not all of their masterpieces are... er... masterpieces in my own opinion. It's all just studio hype. A Goofy Movie has no labelling but is superior to lots of films which do. All the labels mean in actuality is that Walt Disney Feature Animation worked on the film.

No film is automatically a classic, a masterpiece or anything else. And it has nothing to do with who made the film. Just ignore it.

Billy Moon · Post by **Billy Moon** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:38 am

I was mainly surprised by this because until now, the title Classic has referred to the numbered, "official" animated features (with the exception of the five live action/animation combination films). The Jungle Book 2 is not one of them, is it?
I don't think most of them are classics in the actual meaning of the word, but some are.

(Before someone asks, the five live action "classics" are The Song of the South, So Dear to My Heart, Mary Poppins, Bedknobs and Broomsticks & Pete's Dragon.)

Matty-Mouse · Post by **Matty-Mouse** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:15 am

I think by the time its actually released the "Classics" logo will be gone and replaced with a walt disney pictures presents one instead. The same thing happened with Lady and the Tramp 2.

Porce · Post by **Porce** » Wed Aug 06, 2003 4:11 pm

This should not be called a classic. If I ran Disney I would be ashamed to have anything to do with this monstrocity.

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Thu Aug 07, 2003 12:23 am

amen to that DACP!

Kim Olav Svines · Post by **Kim Olav Svines** » Thu Aug 07, 2003 8:38 am

I really enjoyed the movie. Great entertainment.

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Fri Aug 08, 2003 1:03 pm

I agree with Kim, I watched it for the third time today. It keeps little kids entertained, which is what it's meant for, and I enjoyed it too.

And frankly, no one ever thinks of "The Aristocats" as a "Masterpiece" or "Classic" do they? Because it was made to be Lady and the Tramp meets 101 Dalmatians cat style.

Hook

Loomis · Post by **Loomis** » Fri Aug 08, 2003 6:43 pm

Captain Hook wrote:I agree with Kim, I watched it for the third time today. It keeps little kids entertained, which is what it's meant for, and I enjoyed it too.

And frankly, no one ever thinks of "The Aristocats" as a "Masterpiece" or "Classic" do they? Because it was made to be Lady and the Tramp meets 101 Dalmatians cat style.

Although I actually like the Aristocats, I do see your point and agree.

Disney's 'classics'/'masterpieces' are self proclaimed - which might be true of many of them, but it is fairly arrogant of Disney to proclaim that their new film is their latest 'classic' or 'masterpiece'.

Having not seen JB2, I can't comment on its quality. But there is no reason any film can't be considered a classic - as long as Disney wants to call it such, so it is written - so shall it be!

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:43 am

Loomis, I love Aristocats also, don't get me wrong!

I just never think of it as a "Masterpiece", it fit under "Gold Collection" much better in my opinion.

Hook

Loomis · Post by **Loomis** » Sat Aug 09, 2003 6:04 pm

Captain Hook wrote:Loomis, I love Aristocats also, don't get me wrong! I just never think of it as a "Masterpiece", it fit under "Gold Collection" much better in my opinion.

Hook

Oh I dig that...Aristocrats isn't one of my all-timers either (still love it), but all i'm saying is that the whole Masterpiece/Classic/Gold Collection/Platinum thing is a self-proclaimed thing by Disney anyway. If they say it is a classic, then I guess it is...

Billy Moon · Post by **Billy Moon** » Sun Aug 10, 2003 11:43 pm

Captain Hook wrote:And frankly, no one ever thinks of "The Aristocats" as a "Masterpiece" or "Classic" do they?

I do! Actually it really irritates me that everyone criticizes The Aristocats, since it's one of my favorite Disney films...

And again... I do NOT think that every disney "classic" is an actual CLASSIC. However, the term "classic" has to date referred to the official, numbered disney features. JB2 is not one of them. However, it really does carry the classic banner here in Europe. I saw it in a store. Really disturbing and confusing... But I think I can ignore it. Thanks everyone for your support.

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Mon Aug 11, 2003 10:54 am

Billy Moon wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:And frankly, no one ever thinks of "The Aristocats" as a "Masterpiece" or "Classic" do they?
I do! Actually it really irritates me that everyone criticizes The Aristocats, since it's one of my favorite Disney films...

And again... I do NOT think that every disney "classic" is an actual CLASSIC. However, the term "classic" has to date referred to the official, numbered disney features. JB2 is not one of them. However, it really does carry the classic banner here in Europe. I saw it in a store. Really disturbing and confusing... But I think I can ignore it. Thanks everyone for your support.

Oh, sorry, I wasn't trying to criticize it. I really love it a lot. It's a great film. I never think of it as a "Classic" that will live on forever, like I do of Snow White or Beauty and the Beast. It's more of a great movie that I love.

Hmm... well, maybe JB2 really is a Classic... of course that's only Disney's thinking. Frankly, I only think of the Fairy Tales as true "Classics"... but I love the rest of them.

Joe Carioca · Post by **Joe Carioca** » Tue Aug 12, 2003 6:07 pm

This is ridiculous... now [cheap] sequels are labelled "Classics"!!

Here in Brazil too! Just look at the cover arts!

Yeah, I know that not all the "classics" are real classics, but at least this trend used to refer to the A-list of Disney films... now, any film that the company release is labelled a "classic"! Shame on you, Disney!

MDA · Post by **MDA** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:00 am

In the Netherlands and Belgium the same

Loomis · Post by **Loomis** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:03 am

And here in Oz too, it would seem:

No word on our specs yet, although it does have a listing on the Disney.com.au DVD page...

warfly · Post by **warfly** » Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:02 am

The use of the "classic" label has changed.
In the future (starting with The Junglebook 2), all disney movies shown in cinemas will be a "classic" when released on DVD.
The real classics will (at least in Denmark) also have a classic number on the spine.

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » Fri Sep 05, 2003 9:10 pm

warfly wrote:The use of the "classic" label has changed.
In the future (starting with The Junglebook 2), all disney movies shown in cinemas will be a "classic" when released on DVD.
The real classics will (at least in Denmark) also have a classic number on the spine.

Well, I don't know if that adds to the confusion or lessens it!!!

Jack · Post by **Jack** » Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:02 pm

Billy Moon wrote:

Is it just me, or does anyone else find Sher Khan more menacing with his chin cut-off?

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

Jungle Book 2 - a Classic?

Jungle Book 2 - a Classic?

Re: Jungle Book 2 - a Classic?