I will not, because the film sucks eggs.
Who's going to buy VAN HELSING on October 19, 2004
- Just Myself
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Pawnee, IN
- Contact:
Who's going to buy VAN HELSING on October 19, 2004
Just vote and leave a comment.
I will not, because the film sucks eggs.
I will not, because the film sucks eggs.
Cheers,
JM
JM
- MickeyMousePal
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6629
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:40 pm
- Location: The Incredibles LA!!!
- Contact:
- Just Myself
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Pawnee, IN
- Contact:
Yes, the box set too with the original movies (making it the 3rd version of these films I will own).
I don't think there will be a sequel. [a] Whe the heck can he fight? and most importantly the new "New Universal" (old joke if you follow Universal's history) - aka NBC have been very critical of the film's content and box office.
I don't think there will be a sequel. [a] Whe the heck can he fight? and most importantly the new "New Universal" (old joke if you follow Universal's history) - aka NBC have been very critical of the film's content and box office.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
No, because I got the Australian 2 disc (which came out on September 9) as a free review disc:
http://www.dvdbits.com/reviews.asp?id=2260
I think this film benefits from a second viewing. I disliked it at the cinema, but reviewing it gave me a chance to see it in a new light where I actually quite enjoyed it. Still, it is a weak film, just not quite as dismal as some would believe.
http://www.dvdbits.com/reviews.asp?id=2260
I think this film benefits from a second viewing. I disliked it at the cinema, but reviewing it gave me a chance to see it in a new light where I actually quite enjoyed it. Still, it is a weak film, just not quite as dismal as some would believe.
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
- DisneyChris
- Special Edition
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: Hong Kong
- Sir Hawkins
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 10:38 am
I am a huge Stephen Sommers fan, I've enjoyed every one of his films. However this one really dissapointed me. The story was one-dimensional and not all that intruiging. The FX and incredible Silvestri score were the only things that saved the movie. So I won't be buying it, to sum it up.
This movie did poorly at the BO, relatively speaking compared to it's budget, so I highly doubt there will be a sequel, regardless of how many rentals and purchases there will be. Mummy did extremely well, hence the sequel.Just Myself wrote:Oh god, for the sake of the possibility of a sequel, and for the fact that you will lose brain cells, DON'T RENT IT!!!!
I may end up buying it(!) simply for the high cheese factor. If you don't take the film seriously, it's gut-bustingly funny! 
I especially love this parody piece I found a while ago - Van Helsing in Fifteen Minutes.
I especially love this parody piece I found a while ago - Van Helsing in Fifteen Minutes.
Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late."
~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
