House of Mouse coming back I think.
- Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
Re: House of Mouse coming back I think.
no.
You must be really gullible to honestly believe something said from someone on Deviantart to be true.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
-
FigmentJedi
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:06 pm
- disneyprincess11
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4363
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
- Location: Maryland, USA
Yeah, exactly! That alone shouts FAKE. How would they make/know those episodes for 5 seasons so dang fast? Also...Ivan wrote:I doubt it. Television shows are not produced that far in advance that there would already be episodes titles for six years into the future.
1) Where's Tiana, Rapunzel, Flynn etc.? They're pretty much Classic Disney now!
2) Demi Moore (who is in REHAB), Neil Patrick Harris, Hank Azaria, Kate Hudson, David Ogden Stiers, Rowan Atkinson & Susan Egan, who are superstars and so dang busy with like 50 projects, have ALL this time to do some kiddie shows? Heck, Disney Channel was LUCKY to have Justin Bieber and Taylor Swift on Disney Channel.
3) 2014-2018?!?!
4) WAY, WAY, WAY TOO MUCH DISNEY CHARACTERS!
5) There were rumors of HOM coming back when Epic Mickey was coming out with Oswald in it.
6) Why would Disney revive an old Disney Channel show like that?
I'm sorry, but it's fake. [/list]
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
Re: House of Mouse coming back I think.
Yeah. Sounds so totally legit.When asked if the facts are legit, DDD1988 wrote:I THINK SO, YOU GUYS!!!!......THAT'S THE WAY I'M SENDING THESE FACTS TO EVERYONE ELSE TO SHOW THESE POSTS!!!!.......THANKS A LOT TO ALL OF US, AND I HOPE YOU GUYS ENJOY MY OWN ARTWORK THAT I'M GOING TO POST TO EVERYONE ELSE!!!!"
-
TheValentineBros
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:26 am
- Contact:
- rs_milo_whatever
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:56 pm
- Contact:
- Dr Frankenollie
- In The Vaults
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am
What a load of nonsense. Even if Disney ever did bring it back (which they won't), they would not plan episodes that far in advance. What if it was extremely unsuccessful? Besides, doing something with classic Disney characters may disrupt the Disney Channel's regular broadcasting of loathsome 'tween pop sensations' and crappy cartoons. 
- RIPJoeRanft
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:33 pm
I wish if it's true, but I'm afraid it's just crazy fanfiction.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. Disney Channel needs to shape up this tween sitcom nonesense. Disney needs to make an new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends which will be for everybody. But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse won't be on air forever.Dr Frankenollie wrote:What a load of nonsense. Even if Disney ever did bring it back (which they won't), they would not plan episodes that far in advance. What if it was extremely unsuccessful? Besides, doing something with classic Disney characters may disrupt the Disney Channel's regular broadcasting of loathsome 'tween pop sensations' and crappy cartoons.
- milojthatch
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2646
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:34 am
I think you may have misunderstood Dr Frankenollie. It seems to me he wasn't saying anything about how he personally felt about a return to classic characters on the DC, but rather he was pointing out the reality of Disney's apparent business strategy. I do not think it is a big secret that Disney is in the middle of re-branding itself right now. Disney Channel will become less and less what it started out as. The only thing that would change that is if Iger's replacement decided the re-brand the re-branding and take Disney back to it's roots. As much as I wish that was the case, I would not hold my breathe.TsWade2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. Disney Channel needs to shape up this tween sitcom nonesense. Disney needs to make an new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends which will be for everybody. But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse won't be on air forever.Dr Frankenollie wrote:What a load of nonsense. Even if Disney ever did bring it back (which they won't), they would not plan episodes that far in advance. What if it was extremely unsuccessful? Besides, doing something with classic Disney characters may disrupt the Disney Channel's regular broadcasting of loathsome 'tween pop sensations' and crappy cartoons.
____________________________________________________________
All the adversity I've had in my life, all my troubles and obstacles, have strengthened me... You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you.
-Walt Disney
All the adversity I've had in my life, all my troubles and obstacles, have strengthened me... You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you.
-Walt Disney
Okay. Let's just hope they make a new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends, as soon as the marketing of Mickey Mouse Clubhouse dies down.milojthatch wrote:I think you may have misunderstood Dr Frankenollie. It seems to me he wasn't saying anything about how he personally felt about a return to classic characters on the DC, but rather he was pointing out the reality of Disney's apparent business strategy. I do not think it is a big secret that Disney is in the middle of re-branding itself right now. Disney Channel will become less and less what it started out as. The only thing that would change that is if Iger's replacement decided the re-brand the re-branding and take Disney back to it's roots. As much as I wish that was the case, I would not hold my breathe.TsWade2 wrote: I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. Disney Channel needs to shape up this tween sitcom nonesense. Disney needs to make an new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends which will be for everybody. But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse won't be on air forever.
- Dr Frankenollie
- In The Vaults
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am
milojthatch is right, you have misunderstood me. I don't like the regular broadcasting on the Disney Channel any more than you do.TsWade2 wrote:But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care.
Gee, is there a thread in which you haven't brought up your loathing of Mickey Mouse Clubhouse?TsWade2 wrote:Let's just hope they make a new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends, as soon as the marketing of Mickey Mouse Clubhouse dies down.
You do know what the rolling-eye-smilie stands for, do you?TsWade2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. Disney Channel needs to shape up this tween sitcom nonesense. Disney needs to make an new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends which will be for everybody. But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse won't be on air forever.
Anyway, this doesn't sound legit at all. Besides, I thought House of Mouse was a bad excuse to recycle bad cartoons from a bad previous show. The idea of all characters meeting was nice, but the execution was terrible, as was the animation.
Look, it's just hard for me to deal with it. I'm trying to control that and I'm nothing like DisneyJedi. And I love House of Mouse no matter what people say. So please, cut me some slack, okay?Goliath wrote:You do know what the rolling-eye-smilie stands for, do you?TsWade2 wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. Disney Channel needs to shape up this tween sitcom nonesense. Disney needs to make an new animated series of Mickey Mouse and friends which will be for everybody. But you guys don't care and Disney Channel doesn't care. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse won't be on air forever.
Anyway, this doesn't sound legit at all. Besides, I thought House of Mouse was a bad excuse to recycle bad cartoons from a bad previous show. The idea of all characters meeting was nice, but the execution was terrible, as was the animation.
P.S. Be thankful that this thread isn't mine.
House of Mouse lost me after awhile. Seems like Tswade2 was right about it being a way to recycle cartoons from some other project. The princesses didn't do much and they never drew Aurora in her blue dress.TsWade2 wrote:Look, it's just hard for me to deal with it. I'm trying to control that and I'm nothing like DisneyJedi. And I love House of Mouse no matter what people say. So please, cut me some slack, okay?Goliath wrote: You do know what the rolling-eye-smilie stands for, do you?
Anyway, this doesn't sound legit at all. Besides, I thought House of Mouse was a bad excuse to recycle bad cartoons from a bad previous show. The idea of all characters meeting was nice, but the execution was terrible, as was the animation.
P.S. Be thankful that this thread isn't mine.
- Dr Frankenollie
- In The Vaults
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am
Deal with what? Anyway, you can be just as ridiculous and annoying as DisneyJedi.TsWade2 wrote:Look, it's just hard for me to deal with it. I'm trying to control that and I'm nothing like DisneyJedi.
WHAT?! Goliath was merely stating his opinion. Cut you some slack?!TsWade2 wrote:And I love House of Mouse no matter what people say. So please, cut me some slack, okay?


