Judy Garland's "Star is Born" Blu-ray bound!

Discussion of non-Disney DVD and Blu-ray.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cordy_Biddle
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:02 am
Location: the balcony of the Bijou...

Judy Garland's "Star is Born" Blu-ray bound!

Post by Cordy_Biddle »

Read on for some great news concerning the Blu-ray debut of 1954's "A Star is Born" starring Judy Garland: :)

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/movies/dv ... ZzAvfVBwQL

Extras will reportedly include the classic 1937 version of "A Star is Born" (fully restored) with Janet Gaynor & Fredric March. I'm wondering if any more lost footage has surfaced since Warner's last DVD release?

Very exciting news for Garland fans! :D
I'm just valentine candy and boxing-gloves!

My DVD Collection :
http://classic-movieguy.dvdaf.com/
User avatar
my chicken is infected
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:55 pm
Contact:

Post by my chicken is infected »

I frequent the Judy Garland board at thejudyroom.com so I've known about the Blu-Ray restoration for quite a while, but I'm thrilled as pie to learn that a restored transfer of the 1937 version will indeed be a bonus, as that's something I've been hoping for with this release.

I also hope Warner will include a documentary on the making and especially the restoration of the film. The current DVD has plenty of nice bonus materials, but a big glaring omission is ANYTHING that explains how the film was butchered after the premiere and its subsequent restoration in '83. A lot of people have said they couldn't watch the movie because they didn't understand why there's several minutes of footage made of still photos. You'd think Warner Bros. would have had the foresight to know that might have happened and put SOMETHING on there, if only a few text screens before the film, to explain that the movie was butchered after its premiere and in restoring the film, several minutes of footage was unable to be found so it was restored with still photos because those scenes fleshed out the story.
Image
-Joey
User avatar
my chicken is infected
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:55 pm
Contact:

Post by my chicken is infected »

A little sad that discussion of this title never really picked up - I figured some more folks here might be interested, for several reasons - classic film musical, Judy Garland's major comeback role, one of the first major examples of restoring a film to its original form, or as close to it as possible.

I'm kinda annoyed that a restored version of the '37 version wasn't included after all, although I'm hoping Warner or someone will do that one of these days. I recently recorded it from TCM and the print they used was of pretty good quality, although not as good as the trailer on both DVD releases of the '54 version. However, until someone releases a restored DVD, this will do. It beats most of the $1 DVD editions out there.

In fact, I have quite a few disappointments with the DVD. Again, no documentary, no introduction, no NOTHING to explain just how badly the film was butchered after its release and its subsequent reconstruction and why several minutes of still photos are used in the film. No commentary, which is quite disappointing. I'd have also liked to see more of the outtake footage that was included in the intro to disc 2. (Well, technically disc 3 - disc 1 is a flipper with half of the film on each side. ANNOYING. And while they're supposed to be dual-layer, neither side goes far above the 4.35 GB most DVD-5's hold, if at all. Disc 2 is also a DVD-5.) And how annoying is it that Warner Bros. has all this outtake footage, yet doesn't have all the footage cut from the actual film? :roll: Good going, Jack Warner.

Other than "Cast & Crew" screens, I do believe EVERYTHING from the 1999 DVD was ported over to the new DVD, so it's nice that nothing seems to be missing and instead we have more material than before with all the alternate takes of musical numbers, dramatic scenes, etc. The cartoon is a nice touch, as is the '42 Lux Radio Theater production of the original '37 film with Judy as Esther. (I'm very happy that Warner Bros. often includes radio productions wherever possible. It's a minor quibble when left out, especially since one can easily find MP3 downloads online, but it's also quite nice when they're already included. My one gripe is that it'd actually be nice if Warner ever offered them on the discs as MP3 files you could download to your computer as well.) Also it's nice to have the recording sessions included, even if many of these have been traded, albeit in low quality, for many years among collectors and can easily be found online if you know where to look. (Although I have a particularly humorous MP3 of a "Melancholy Baby" recording session featuring some colorful language from a frustrated Ms. Garland that, not surprisingly, isn't featured here. :lol: "Aw hell! Well how do you breathe, for chrissake, in this goddamn thing?!")

I've not yet watched the film, but I've previewed it here and there. The 1999 DVD's transfer was already fairly good, but had some issues here and there. This new transfer, even in standard DVD definition, blows the 1999's transfer away. The color and clarity are better than ever. One of the film's strongest suits is George Cukor's use of color. "Born In A Trunk" positively sparkles like never before in this presentation. The audio is also a bit better than the previous release, although that one already had a very strong audio track, so it didn't need as much work.

I'm looking forward to watching the whole film this week. It's positively my favorite Garland film (Well, Wizard Of Oz is higher on my list, but I really don't classify it as a "Garland" film, as it's really truly an ensemble piece. Not that the supporting cast of "Star" should be pushed aside and ignored, but "Star" is definitely a Garland vehicle at heart, while "Oz" is definitely an ensemble piece. In my mind anyway.) and I've been wanting to watch it again for quite some time, but have been waiting for this DVD in order to do so.

PS. Can't wait for the site's review of the DVD/Blu-Ray. :D
Image
-Joey
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

I feel like we experienced the very same frustrations at the very same time. I hope my review lived up to your hopes! Very good movie, and a pretty solid DVD, but I wish it was better.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
User avatar
my chicken is infected
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:55 pm
Contact:

Post by my chicken is infected »

Very well done. Although I've heard from people who saw both versions that even with the still photos, they much prefer the restored version to the theatrical version because the theatrical version no longer made sense to them, so I'm perfectly happy never to watch it. :P I'm just annoyed that they couldn't even bother to make some type of text intro or anything to explain why there's still photos in place of film. Not EVERYONE who's gonna watch it will know the history behind the film being butchered after its premiere and such.

I'm just happy that outside of the text screens from the original DVD, Warner Bros. retained everything from the original DVD, albeit it wasn't until I read the review that I discovered everything on the bonus disc was letterboxed. :| But regardless, I think a certain company known for family-oriented entertainment could take a few notes from Warner's knack of retaining everything from previous DVD issues. *cough*
Image
-Joey
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Yeah, I imagine that the theatrical cut could be somewhat incoherent. But it seems criminal to not release the version of the film that existed for thirty years.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
User avatar
Disneykid
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 9:10 am
Location: Wonderland

Post by Disneykid »

My Blu-ray copy just arrived today from Amazon and I'm going to pop it in shortly. I admit that I, too, am already annoyed at the lack of proper retrospective. Even "minor" Judy Garland titles on DVD like In The Good Old Summertime and The Pirate came with nice featurettes. Everything on A Star is Born is archival material, the same issue I've infamously had with Alice in Wonderland's last few releases. The lack of commentary from Garland expert John Fricke is also really conspicuous while the letterboxing of everything is just flat-out bizarre. This can't be a case of WB rushing the DVD/BD production since they've been working on this restoration for about a year, though it's possible they didn't work on bonus material until the last minute.

Supposedly an uncut version A Star is Born still exists, though whether it's the 196-minute test screening version or the 182-minute premiere version has not been clarified. I always figured it was just a nice urban legend until this article popped up a short while ago:

http://www.thejudyroom.com/asib/asib-article.html

Now I have to admit I'm more convinced.

Still, more than A Star is Born, I'd love to see the rough test cut of The Wizard of Oz that ran about 20 minutes longer. I've got a copy of the final shooting script, and every scene or piece of dialogue cut out is bolded. I honestly think all of that stuff sounded good enough to leave in with the exception of The Jitterbug, which killed the momentum surrounding it.

Anyway, going back to A Star is Born, I'm really glad you liked the film, Luke, and I have to agree that the musical numbers feel detached from the main narrative, a problem I had to a lesser extent with Easter Parade. I really like the Born in a Trunk medley on its own, but it does the same thing that the Broadway Melody portion of Singin' in the Rain does: it grinds the story to a halt and is too self-contained. As much I love Judy, this film probably would've flowed a bit better as straight drama. As it is, it feels like two very good-but-different films spliced together.

In terms of Judy Garland films, I rank this fourth after The Wizard of Oz, Meet Me in St. Louis, and the Easter Parade.
carolinakid
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2044
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:58 am
Gender: Male
Location: New Jersey but soon to be Florida!

Post by carolinakid »

I adore the comparison footage of The Man That Got Away. Judy's talent is amazing. I do think she looks prettiest in the final film version. Love the bangs!
User avatar
Cordy_Biddle
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:02 am
Location: the balcony of the Bijou...

Post by Cordy_Biddle »

If Michael Arick *does* have the complete version of "A Star is Born", then odds are that Judy's kids (Liza Minnelli, Lorna Luft and Joe Luft) would have seen it and be able to confirm it's existance. I'm surprised Liza hasn't had a word or two to Arick about it, since they worked so closely on the restoration of her "Liza with a Z" a few years ago.

It's a crime that Arick isn't willing to work with the major powers at WB; I hope this changes soon because there are thousands of fans who'd love to finally own the complete, unbutchered print of this gem.
I'm just valentine candy and boxing-gloves!

My DVD Collection :
http://classic-movieguy.dvdaf.com/
Post Reply