2099net wrote: Now if even half of what I stated in the initial paragraph of this post is true, then Disney are not "evil". Eisner has not done his best to boot out well regarded talents just to be "greedy". (In fact, if Eisner was "greedy" wouldn't he do his best to keep them, being as they've turned over hundreds of millions of dollars for Disney in the past?). But of course, Disney management, including Einser are directly and indirectly for their leaving. But in shades of grey, not simple black and white. Which is, I think, important.
Yeah, I think it is unfair to blame Eisner for everything. It is like terrorists - you can't seem to stub your toe these days without somebody screaming "suspected terrorist action". They aren't the cause of
every disaster, Eisner is not the Devil.
Having said that, there seems to be an enviroment fostered at Disney right now that even the most talented and successful of them aren't staying. Although we only have a limited amount of info from Jim Hill (who was already hauled over the coals last week for misquoting David Stainton), it would seem that their departure was at least partly due to their own dissatisfaction with the state of affairs.
Guess we will have to wait and see if more info is supplied..