Disney's new website-just horrible

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Disney's new website-just horrible

Post by Ariel'sprince »

If you go to Disney new horrible website http://home.disney.go.com/lite/inde will find out that Disney made some character in "places" for people-
Preschool:
Mickey Mouse and Tumper.
Boys:
Lightning Mqueen and Buzz Lightyear.
Kids and tweens:
High School Musical,Raven and Jack Sparrow.
Girls:
It's baiscley TinkerBell and Cinderella but now it's Aurora and Jasmine (maybe it's becouse of Enchanted Tales and later they'll put Cinderella and TinkerBell back,maybe this mean that when the next volume will be out they'll put Cinderella and Mulan and the site).
Families:
Goofy and Dumbo.
this is horrible,it's the same for the CD's part of the site and the books.
there's also a Disney Fan with Mary Poppins and Snow White but it has things that Disney Fan don't need like a guide to DisneyLand? how about Disney fans allready *know* where to go in DisneyLand? and it's dosn't make it better.
who said only little girls like (actually,they just buy the Princess's and TinkerBell stuff becouse the dress of the character,not becouse they actually like thier films or the characters) Cinderella and TinkerBell or Aurora and Jasmine? who said only little boys like Buzz Lightyear and Lightning Mqueen? and who said only kids in preschool age like Mickey Mouse and Tumper? this is worng and afwal.
speaking about the website:anyone notice there's now Aurora insted of Cinderella in the princess section?.
Last edited by Ariel'sprince on Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
musicradio77
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Contact:

Post by musicradio77 »

I guess that this site is not that bad.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

It is very bad,why? you think Mickey is only for kids in perschool age?.
Image
Mason_Ireton

Post by Mason_Ireton »

At first I didn't know what to make of the site, aftere a few weeks of trying it out....I warmed up to it *smiles* I really think Mickey Mouse is a general icon to childern under age 10, cause when you think of Disney as a child, you're thinking Mickey, Donald and Pluto... while as an high school-college: you're thinking of Peter Pan, Jungle Book, Mickey, Snow White, Dumbo.

And the theme parks, I've noticed on some ads that I get in the mail, Dumbo or Peter Pan/Tinkerbell are showing hovering above Disneyland/Disney World which doesn't bother me at all, cause wel, you do have to fly to get to the parks.
User avatar
Prudence
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: The Kingdom of Perrault

Post by Prudence »

It's not bad. It's at least nothing to get your feathers in a bunch over.
Image
That's hot.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

Mason_Ireton wrote:At first I didn't know what to make of the site, aftere a few weeks of trying it out....I warmed up to it *smiles* I really think Mickey Mouse is a general icon to childern under age 10, cause when you think of Disney as a child, you're thinking Mickey, Donald and Pluto... while as an high school-college: you're thinking of Peter Pan, Jungle Book, Mickey, Snow White, Dumbo.
They are franchising characters like Aurora and Mulan for little girl and litle boys are missing wonderfull films becouse they think it's a "girly" movie.
I hate this website and it's simpely terrible.
Prudence wrote:It's not bad. It's at least nothing to get your feathers in a bunch over.
Not bad??? they're franchsing Cinderella for little girls only who havn't seen those fims and you said it's not bad?.

*Edit* Post combined by a Moderator.
Image
User avatar
Prudence
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: The Kingdom of Perrault

Post by Prudence »

Ariel'sprince wrote:
Prudence wrote:It's not bad. It's at least nothing to get your feathers in a bunch over.
Not bad??? they're franchsing Cinderella for little girls only who havn't seen those fims and you said it's not bad?.
Why do you want us all to become angry about the website? Besides, little girls are easier to talk to than certain older boys who have nothing better to do than try to make everyone irritated over nothing. *cough*
I'm only referring to Ariel'sprince in this instance.
Image
That's hot.
Mason_Ireton

Post by Mason_Ireton »

First off, everybody, chill out.

I perfectly understand why Cinderella and the other Disney girls are promoted to girls, it's cause there's a certain age line that'll actualy be attracted to the disney princess ( 3-2nd grade) and these girls seem brand new to those who haven't been exposed to Disney's magic.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

Prudence wrote:
Ariel'sprince wrote: Not bad??? they're franchsing Cinderella for little girls only who havn't seen those fims and you said it's not bad?.
Why do you want us all to become angry about the website? Besides, little girls are easier to talk to than certain older boys who have nothing better to do than try to make everyone irritated over nothing. *cough*
I'm only referring to Ariel'sprince in this instance.
Nothing? how about they treat Disney fans bad? i don't you all to become angry on the site but you dosn't understand at all why this site is bad.
Mason_Ireton wrote:I perfectly understand why Cinderella and the other Disney girls are promoted to girls, it's cause there's a certain age line that'll actualy be attracted to the disney princess ( 3-2nd grade) and these girls seem brand new to those who haven't been exposed to Disney's magic.
But you're saying that of they think Disney is for small children you agree with them? well,i don't,i think everyone,every age and every sex can love Disney and all the characters.
If you're saying you think it's right to franchise films like Pocahontas and Beauty and The Beast then it means that you're really think they are for little girls only.

*Edit* Posts combined by a moderator.
Image
Mason_Ireton

Post by Mason_Ireton »

I admit that I enjoy the Disney Princess once in while, though I don't actualy buy a product unless it's something that captures my fancy. My 8 yr old niece used to be big Disney Princess fan and she kinda kicked the habit round age 5-7 (somewhere round there) she still enjoys Disney stuff, but she's trying to broading her horizons which I don't mind at all...
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

Mason_Ireton wrote:I admit that I enjoy the Disney Princess once in while, though I don't actualy buy a product unless it's something that captures my fancy. My 8 yr old niece used to be big Disney Princess fan and she kinda kicked the habit round age 5-7 (somewhere round there) she still enjoys Disney stuff, but she's trying to broading her horizons which I don't mind at all...
So,since you don't buy Disney marchandise you can't see the problem,well,people treat those films badly and the new site dosn't help change it.
Image
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

It says that the "page cannot be found", so I guess the danger is over now.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

Lars Vermundsberget wrote:It says that the "page cannot be found", so I guess the danger is over now.
No,it's not danger and it's on the home page.
I thought you people* care about how Disney treat their movies!.
*refering only to Prudance,Mason and Musicradio77,there's other people in this forum who care about Disney.
Image
User avatar
candydog
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by candydog »

I really do undertstand what Ariel'sPrince is getting at. I hate it when movies like Cinderella are marketed towards girls. Nowadays, there is a much greater variety of entertainment for kids due to advances in Television and video games. Because more forms of screen entertainment are around now, it is very easy for producers to market different shows and characters to different genders.

Never forget though, that when films like Cinderella were first released years ago, they were family movies. There was something for everyone. All of Disneys great hits back then captivated the world together, today's hits like High School Musical only seem to captivate the kids, which is great, but I don't think it was Uncle Walt's big dream.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

candydog wrote:I really do undertstand what Ariel'sPrince is getting at. I hate it when movies like Cinderella are marketed towards girls. Nowadays, there is a much greater variety of entertainment for kids due to advances in Television and video games. Because more forms of screen entertainment are around now, it is very easy for producers to market different shows and characters to different genders.

Never forget though, that when films like Cinderella were first released years ago, they were family movies. There was something for everyone. All of Disneys great hits back then captivated the world together, today's hits like High School Musical only seem to captivate the kids, which is great, but I don't think it was Uncle Walt's big dream.
Thank you Candydog for understaing me :D.
That's what i"m saying,the new website dosn't help at all.
Who said only little girl like Jasmine and Aurora? or that only little boys like Cars and Toy Story? it's ridicoules,little girls can like Cars and Toy Story and little boys can like Aurora and Jasmine,and not only little girls-even teen and grown up males and females can like Aurora and Jasmine or Toy Story and cars no matter what age are they or if they're males or females.
Image
yamiiguy
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1685
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by yamiiguy »

Maybe it's because it's the favourite characters of that age group? I liked Mickey Mouse when I was a pre-schooler but now I like Jack Sparrow more. I bet you around 70% of boys like Buzz Lightyear better than ANY of the Disney Princesses
User avatar
kurtadisneyite
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: los angeles, ca

Post by kurtadisneyite »

Amazing how times change.
When Cinderella and many of these films were made, the characters were aimed at FAMILIES.
And at the revival showings I've been to, the adults, _not the kids_, are the ones interested in what the human-like characters (Including Cinderella ) are doing. The kids liked the animals and anything that was fast paced and colorful.
2D isn't Ded yet!
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

yamiiguy wrote:Maybe it's because it's the favourite characters of that age group? I liked Mickey Mouse when I was a pre-schooler but now I like Jack Sparrow more. I bet you around 70% of boys like Buzz Lightyear better than ANY of the Disney Princesses
It's becouse of the brainwash Disney made latley,and i don't they actually asked little boys,they just thought of all of those nonsense alone.
kurtadisneyite wrote:Amazing how times change.
When Cinderella and many of these films were made, the characters were aimed at FAMILIES.
And at the revival showings I've been to, the adults, _not the kids_, are the ones interested in what the human-like characters (Including Cinderella ) are doing. The kids liked the animals and anything that was fast paced and colorful.
Exactly.
and i noticed that too,Disney are just making brainwash from things that arn't true.
Cinderella or Pochontas are films that were aimed that families,today they aimed Cinderella for little girls.

*Edit* Posts combined by a moderator.
Image
User avatar
jeremy88
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:03 am

Post by jeremy88 »

Well honestly, I don't think Disney is "brainwashing" anyone. I think that it's always sort of been that way where the Disney Princesses appeal more to little girls then little boys. Now I was a kid that grew up during the time when The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast were in their heyday(way before the Princess line), and while I knew a lot of other boys that liked the movies as kids, they weren't really wanting to go out and buy the movies merchandise. So basically the movies are aimed at Famlies for everyone to enjoy, but when it comes to the characters themselves they're going to be marketed towards little girls, because little girls are into that whole "Princess" idea.

When it comes to Disney fans of all ages, it doesn't really matter what gender or age group the character is aimed to, because they like the character for what they are in their movie. However, Disney is going to market where the money is at. There's obviousley a lot more little girls then there are Disney fans, so of course your going to see the Disney Princesses in merchandise that's aimed for little girls. Why? Simply because it appeals much more to girls then it does boys.

Now in case no one wanted to read above here's a short summary...Basically, The movies themselves will always be aimed towards families while the characters themselves are going to be aimed at certaint age and gender groups...it's sad but true, while not true for everyone, some girls hate the Disney Princesses while some boys love them...it again just depends on each individual.

Hah I forgot to give my insight on the whole web site design lol. I like it, while I don't like the fact how the characters are set up for different age and gender groups, it is well designed and easier to naviagate, and it serves it's purpose on Disney info.
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c312/ ... sney-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16704
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

jeremy88 wrote: Now I was a kid that grew up during the time when The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast were in their heyday(way before the Princess line), and while I knew a lot of other boys that liked the movies as kids, they weren't really wanting to go out and buy the movies merchandise. So basically the movies are aimed at Famlies for everyone to enjoy, but when it comes to the characters themselves they're going to be marketed towards little girls, because little girls are into that whole "Princess" idea.
I agree completely. My older brother would see Disney movies with me at the theater (but not after "The Lion King"), but he wouldn't be the one with the dolls and clothes from those movies- I would (okay, he did have Abu pajamas). Boys will wear clothes with "Cars" characters on them and not with Princess on them...because of gender stereotypes. It's just the way we're taught (I'm no psychology or sociology major!). But, many boys still enjoy "Princess" movies, even if they don't go out and buy the merchandise.
Image
Post Reply