Jasmine1022 wrote:Or maybe she just decided to take a picture of herself naked for someone she cared about
If she wanted to lose the 'good girl' image, I think the picture would have been much more raunchy.
Jessica Biel took much less revealing photos to lose her "good girl" image when she was tired of it. I'm not saying she didn't "just decide to take a picture of herself naked for someone she cared about," I said a celebrity should KNOW something like that is bound to get out to the public, unless she is incredibly dull-witted. And, again, it's not the extremely common expression of caring that so many people try to excuse it as. Most people have never taken a nude photo, so trying to call it a normal thing is just silly. It's not even a question of right or wrong, it's this idea that nude photos are a normal part of life for most people that is so absurd. That's like saying all those girls on Girls Gone Wild commercials represent what the average girl does on Spring Break. A lot of them, yes, but it's rather pushing it to say that it is the norm. That's usually just an excuse used by those who are trying to excuse themselves or someone they care for.
Now, personally, I'm not anti-nude photos at all, but that doesn't mean I'd want anyone I cared about to take any and I'd hope they had the sense not to take private ones. The thing about the private ones like this one is that you know they aren't taken for any "artistic" purposes, and there are much better ways to express your caring for someone. Speaking as a guy, and an artist no less, if your man is trying to get you to take pictures like this one for him, you might want to question his motives, because there's no reason he shouldn't be satisfied with a clothed picture. I mean, not that you can't take artistic nudes in private, but you can tell by the pose that it wasn't an attempt at being artistic on either person's part.
