The directors never liked a piece of animation of Cogsworth when the villagers want to siege the castle and Beast doesn't see a point in defending anymore. Anyway, they asked if it could be changed for the dvd/Imax version. Disney said yes, but let a different animator do it under severe time constraints. So it's still not what the directors want.toonaspie wrote: Fraid to ask but what's The Cogsworth Incident? I must admit I never noticed the difference between the two versions seeing I didnt watch the original as much.
Beauty And The Beast: Diamond Edition Discussion Oct. 5th!
- KubrickFan
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am

- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
Not necessarily, but you have to agree, in a situation like this, Cogsworth is not going to flail his arms about for no reason and make a facial expression like, "OMG, HOLY CRAP!"(Old Version)
No. He's not really the type. A more simplistic gesture, and a face like "But... why has he done that?" is much better. There's a reason why they changed it, not just "well, let's put something new in here to screw with our fans' heads."
No. He's not really the type. A more simplistic gesture, and a face like "But... why has he done that?" is much better. There's a reason why they changed it, not just "well, let's put something new in here to screw with our fans' heads."
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
- Disney's Divinity
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16239
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
- Gender: Male
I disagree. Losing your chance for humanity is just cause for flailing. Besides, Cogsworth's character is wound up, but he cracks under pressure. Not to say I don't agree with the directors that it could've used re-animating, just that it fits in line with the film as it is regardless and seems an unnecessary change.
Also, that you enjoyed the changes to B&tB doesn't bother me. That you liked "Morning Report," on the other hand...
Also, that you enjoyed the changes to B&tB doesn't bother me. That you liked "Morning Report," on the other hand...


Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
caps?KubrickFan wrote:toonaspie wrote: Fraid to ask but what's The Cogsworth Incident? I must admit I never noticed the difference between the two versions seeing I didnt watch the original as much.
The directors never liked a piece of animation of Cogsworth when the villagers want to siege the castle and Beast doesn't see a point in defending anymore. Anyway, they asked if it could be changed for the dvd/Imax version. Disney said yes, but let a different animator do it under severe time constraints. So it's still not what the directors want.

- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
Here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZzxxBZUD-o
I admit I prefer the animation of the second one, but prefer the shading of the first one. Still, either way, the original should be given as a viable option on the BD. Let's see what happens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZzxxBZUD-o
I admit I prefer the animation of the second one, but prefer the shading of the first one. Still, either way, the original should be given as a viable option on the BD. Let's see what happens.
- SpringHeelJack
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
I always preferred the second one. It's less of a tizzy little fit and more of a broken, defeated look, which to me felt all the more apropos at that point in the film.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
My thoughts exactly.SpringHeelJack wrote:I always preferred the second one. It's less of a tizzy little fit and more of a broken, defeated look, which to me felt all the more apropos at that point in the film.
And yeah, Disney's Divinity, I know, it's shameful!

http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:
http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
Since he didn't get that chance to re-animated the scene, it should have been left alone, point blank! I cannot stand when Disney goes and touches up a film for no reason. Do you think I fell in love with the movie because Cogsworth srugged his arms that way? NO, it was the movie itself!Miss Jo wrote:Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:
http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
I don't know, it definitely looks better now. It's a shame Will Finn didn't get to oversee the change himself (because he would have, willingly!), but he wasn't at Disney at the time, therefore relinquishing his opportunity to do anything with the company. At least they did comply with his wish that the animation be changed, even if he wasn't the one to do it.
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
But has seeing it changed made you fall out of love with the movie?Matt wrote:Since he didn't get that chance to re-animated the scene, it should have been left alone, point blank! I cannot stand when Disney goes and touches up a film for no reason. Do you think I fell in love with the movie because Cogsworth srugged his arms that way? NO, it was the movie itself!Miss Jo wrote:Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:
http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
Personally, I think it shouldn't have been changed, because we all know Beauty and the Beast was rushed and I dare say there's other sequences of animation the animators and/or directors would want to change. It's no secret Belle goes off-model often for example.
But I have no problem with anything being changed when the film is clearly labelled as a "Special Edition" and has "an all new animated-song" included. Of course, that's talking about it theatrically and not on home video where (probably down to the need to make such a high-profile release compatible with the highest number of players at the time) the branching was crude and inefficient meaning we didn't get the original "theatrical" version of the film. Hopefully with the next release (on DVD and on Blu-ray) will use better, proper seamless branching.
It seems a bit off they would change that for the "special edition" when, for example, we know an animated prologue was first planned but dropped due to time constraints. I know it all comes down to money (everything ultimately comes down to money) but I would have thought, if going for a new edit of the film and calling it a special edition, why not go all the way and restore as much of the original vision as possible?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
-
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
- Location: Walt Disney World
I'm guessing that the lack of a preview has more to do with the fact that the release is still a year away. It was already featured on Snow White and Tinker Bell ATLT. If they put it on every release between now and October 2010, it will be overkill and people might even get sick of seeing it and become less inclined to buy it (law of diminishing marginal utility).Matt wrote:No previews on the UP Blu-ray, hmmmm. I hope this wasn't pushed back for 2011!![]()
I'm just glad that a preview for Dumbo automatically plays for it. It would be great if that sold really well to encourage more Blu-Ray releases of DACs.
I'm currently watching and reviewing every Disney film in chronological order. You can follow along at my blog, The Disney Films, and also follow me on Twitter.
- musicradio77
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
- Contact:
I believe that this is a UK version of the trailer, but here is the US trailer, but it was taken from the Diamond Edition of "Snow White" which I don't have it in my collection. Enjoy!Matt wrote:Here is the Official Diamond Edition Trailer!!!
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8cpckbAXUig&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8cpckbAXUig&hl ... 2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
the colors make me sick!
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tH8-wC-ab18&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tH8-wC-ab18&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
-
- Member
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:05 pm