Beauty And The Beast: Diamond Edition Discussion Oct. 5th!

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Locked
User avatar
KubrickFan
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am

Post by KubrickFan »

toonaspie wrote: Fraid to ask but what's The Cogsworth Incident? I must admit I never noticed the difference between the two versions seeing I didnt watch the original as much.
The directors never liked a piece of animation of Cogsworth when the villagers want to siege the castle and Beast doesn't see a point in defending anymore. Anyway, they asked if it could be changed for the dvd/Imax version. Disney said yes, but let a different animator do it under severe time constraints. So it's still not what the directors want.
Image
User avatar
Margos
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA

Post by Margos »

Not necessarily, but you have to agree, in a situation like this, Cogsworth is not going to flail his arms about for no reason and make a facial expression like, "OMG, HOLY CRAP!"(Old Version)
No. He's not really the type. A more simplistic gesture, and a face like "But... why has he done that?" is much better. There's a reason why they changed it, not just "well, let's put something new in here to screw with our fans' heads."
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com

^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Post by Disney's Divinity »

I disagree. Losing your chance for humanity is just cause for flailing. Besides, Cogsworth's character is wound up, but he cracks under pressure. Not to say I don't agree with the directors that it could've used re-animating, just that it fits in line with the film as it is regardless and seems an unnecessary change.

Also, that you enjoyed the changes to B&tB doesn't bother me. That you liked "Morning Report," on the other hand... :o
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

Cogsworth always came off exhausted, annoyed, and rhetorical to me in the original version. In the second it feels like he's actually asking a valid, "Why [did you do that]?"
Image
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

KubrickFan wrote:
toonaspie wrote: Fraid to ask but what's The Cogsworth Incident? I must admit I never noticed the difference between the two versions seeing I didnt watch the original as much.


The directors never liked a piece of animation of Cogsworth when the villagers want to siege the castle and Beast doesn't see a point in defending anymore. Anyway, they asked if it could be changed for the dvd/Imax version. Disney said yes, but let a different animator do it under severe time constraints. So it's still not what the directors want.
caps? :)
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

Better yet.....

I can't find that video.
Image
User avatar
Disneykid
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 9:10 am
Location: Wonderland

Post by Disneykid »

Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZzxxBZUD-o

I admit I prefer the animation of the second one, but prefer the shading of the first one. Still, either way, the original should be given as a viable option on the BD. Let's see what happens.
User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by SpringHeelJack »

I always preferred the second one. It's less of a tizzy little fit and more of a broken, defeated look, which to me felt all the more apropos at that point in the film.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
User avatar
Margos
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA

Post by Margos »

SpringHeelJack wrote:I always preferred the second one. It's less of a tizzy little fit and more of a broken, defeated look, which to me felt all the more apropos at that point in the film.
My thoughts exactly.

And yeah, Disney's Divinity, I know, it's shameful! :oops: I can't help it though! I think it's a catchy tune, and the puns make me smile.... The original version was slightly less amusing. I do, however, find the voices fairly wretched, but at least they're better than that guy they got to dub David Tomlinson's lines in "Bedknobs."
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com

^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
User avatar
Miss Jo
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:21 pm

Post by Miss Jo »

Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:

http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
Matt
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 11:33 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Matt »

Miss Jo wrote:Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:

http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
Since he didn't get that chance to re-animated the scene, it should have been left alone, point blank! I cannot stand when Disney goes and touches up a film for no reason. Do you think I fell in love with the movie because Cogsworth srugged his arms that way? NO, it was the movie itself!
User avatar
Margos
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA

Post by Margos »

I don't know, it definitely looks better now. It's a shame Will Finn didn't get to oversee the change himself (because he would have, willingly!), but he wasn't at Disney at the time, therefore relinquishing his opportunity to do anything with the company. At least they did comply with his wish that the animation be changed, even if he wasn't the one to do it.
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com

^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Matt wrote:
Miss Jo wrote:Just in case anyone hasn't seen this and is interested, here's what animator Will Finn himself had to say about the Cogsworth Incident:

http://willfinn.blogspot.com/2008/07/clockwork.html
Since he didn't get that chance to re-animated the scene, it should have been left alone, point blank! I cannot stand when Disney goes and touches up a film for no reason. Do you think I fell in love with the movie because Cogsworth srugged his arms that way? NO, it was the movie itself!
But has seeing it changed made you fall out of love with the movie?

Personally, I think it shouldn't have been changed, because we all know Beauty and the Beast was rushed and I dare say there's other sequences of animation the animators and/or directors would want to change. It's no secret Belle goes off-model often for example.

But I have no problem with anything being changed when the film is clearly labelled as a "Special Edition" and has "an all new animated-song" included. Of course, that's talking about it theatrically and not on home video where (probably down to the need to make such a high-profile release compatible with the highest number of players at the time) the branching was crude and inefficient meaning we didn't get the original "theatrical" version of the film. Hopefully with the next release (on DVD and on Blu-ray) will use better, proper seamless branching.

It seems a bit off they would change that for the "special edition" when, for example, we know an animated prologue was first planned but dropped due to time constraints. I know it all comes down to money (everything ultimately comes down to money) but I would have thought, if going for a new edit of the film and calling it a special edition, why not go all the way and restore as much of the original vision as possible?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

After looking at the clip I dont see why Will Finn was so desperate to have it change. It really didnt look like a big deal to me. Disney films have ton of brief animation quirks like that all the time.
Matt
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 11:33 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Matt »

No previews on the UP Blu-ray, hmmmm. I hope this wasn't pushed back for 2011! :x :(
goofystitch
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Walt Disney World

Post by goofystitch »

Matt wrote:No previews on the UP Blu-ray, hmmmm. I hope this wasn't pushed back for 2011! :x :(
I'm guessing that the lack of a preview has more to do with the fact that the release is still a year away. It was already featured on Snow White and Tinker Bell ATLT. If they put it on every release between now and October 2010, it will be overkill and people might even get sick of seeing it and become less inclined to buy it (law of diminishing marginal utility).

I'm just glad that a preview for Dumbo automatically plays for it. It would be great if that sold really well to encourage more Blu-Ray releases of DACs.
I'm currently watching and reviewing every Disney film in chronological order. You can follow along at my blog, The Disney Films, and also follow me on Twitter.
User avatar
Kyle
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3550
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Kyle »

yeah, its too soon to put it on up. I'd expect it on the Frog blu ray though.
Matt
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 11:33 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Matt »

Ahhh, so I guess we were just getting a teaser? lol
User avatar
musicradio77
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Contact:

Post by musicradio77 »

Matt wrote:Here is the Official Diamond Edition Trailer!!!

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8cpckbAXUig&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8cpckbAXUig&hl ... 2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

the colors make me sick! :x
I believe that this is a UK version of the trailer, but here is the US trailer, but it was taken from the Diamond Edition of "Snow White" which I don't have it in my collection. Enjoy!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tH8-wC-ab18&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tH8-wC-ab18&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
DisneyPrincessSyndrome
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:05 pm

Post by DisneyPrincessSyndrome »

Well, the DVD that came with Snow White's Blu-Ray had the preview. Oh my goodness, I'm so unhappy about all of this. I hope they don't push the DVD back or I'll lose my mind.
Locked