Yepyukitora wrote:Are these new features?
And lets hope we get a lot more of them
They did it with Wall-E, putting "The Pixar Story" on disc 2 so that they could fill up 2-discs, even though "The Pixar Story" was made before Wall-E.Margos wrote:I tend to doubt that "The Reluctant Dragon" will be included... really, is it like Disney to give us two full-length films for the price of one? (and, no, the "Classic Caballeros Collection" doesn't really count, since they were both considered the "feature presentation.")
I would say that the fact that DMC no longer carries their exclusive version of the film in it's entirety might be a good indication that Disney has been thinking about releasing it elsewhere, possibly on the Dumbo Special Edition. If the bonuses classified are the only new bonuses (in addition to what will be recycled), then they still don't have enough to fill up 2-DVD discs.It really stinks, too, since it one of the few movies that I want, but don't have yet... I joined DMC too late to get the exlusive, barebones edition, and can't afford the WDT: Behind the Scenes at the Walt Disney Studios.....
Oh really? Actually starting from the beginning and working their way to the end? That's actually quite, well, logical. I like the idea!JDCB1986 wrote: I remember reading somewhere they said they have been working on restoring the whole animated canon and that at the time of the interview they were "starting from the beginning."
That sounds like what they recently did with The Wizard of Oz. Very smart if you ask me, actually preparing for the decades to come! I think we're reaching a point were certain films are about as "restored" as they are going to get, so now it's all about maximum resolution.JDCB1986 wrote: With this new process and having the negatives scanned at an 8K resolution (nearly 8x larger than Blu-ray is capable of showing,) a proper restoration from the original negatives could last Disney for several years and formats, much longer than restorations of the past.
If they restored all of the animated classics from their original negatives, they would have no need to restore them again until a format was available that is capable of showing better than 8K resolution, which will be a VERY long time.
I'm not sure if they are working beginning to end, naturally the will have to give the titles being released sooner top priority, but if I remember correctly, they had said there were plans to restore them all. Once they get to the CAPS films it's a different story, but the 29 (or however many it is) before that will all be restored using the same technique. (If they follow through with their plans.)JustOneBite87 wrote:Oh really? Actually starting from the beginning and working their way to the end? That's actually quite, well, logical. I like the idea!JDCB1986 wrote: I remember reading somewhere they said they have been working on restoring the whole animated canon and that at the time of the interview they were "starting from the beginning."

yukitora wrote:I honestly think the lower video quality of the 70/80s film has something to do with why people (nowadays) don't tend to enjoy them as much...
so looking forward to these!
There's no way Disney is going to pay for 8K restorations. The process is incredibly expensive and superfluous as well. The difference between a 4K restoration and 8K cannot be seen on a HDTV. Also, I doubt people will have 8K equipment at home. You need an absolutely enormous screen to get the full benefits from it.JDCB1986 wrote: With this new process and having the negatives scanned at an 8K resolution (nearly 8x larger than Blu-ray is capable of showing,) a proper restoration from the original negatives could last Disney for several years and formats, much longer than restorations of the past.
If they restored all of the animated classics from their original negatives, they would have no need to restore them again until a format was available that is capable of showing better than 8K resolution, which will be a VERY long time.

KubrickFan wrote:There's no way Disney is going to pay for 8K restorations. The process is incredibly expensive and superfluous as well. The difference between a 4K restoration and 8K cannot be seen on a HDTV. Also, I doubt people will have 8K equipment at home. You need an absolutely enormous screen to get the full benefits from it.JDCB1986 wrote: With this new process and having the negatives scanned at an 8K resolution (nearly 8x larger than Blu-ray is capable of showing,) a proper restoration from the original negatives could last Disney for several years and formats, much longer than restorations of the past.
If they restored all of the animated classics from their original negatives, they would have no need to restore them again until a format was available that is capable of showing better than 8K resolution, which will be a VERY long time.
And 8K is only four times bigger than HD, which is around 2K.

Um, no it isn't. Standard 35mm film is around 4k. And the differences in size between a 35mm frame and an IMAX frame is pretty big:ajmrowland wrote:How enormous, you ask? From my understanding, IMAX is only 4k.

But 8K restorations are simply superfluous for the films that aren't shot on 70mm. The lightly added details aren't worth the cost, I think. Especially not for around fourty full-length motion pictures.JDCB1986 wrote: Firstly... we were both wrong about how much better 8K is than HD.
According to the folks who just restored The Wizard Of Oz using 8K,
"The 8K scan would have about 16 times the pixel resolution of an HD image."
Secondly... in 2003 a typical colour film digital restoration ran about $75-250K...
Even if that price had doubled, which is not likely, seeing as the restoration processes have improved so greatly since then.
Spending $500K on these films, that will without question earn that money back in the many years of
home video and theatrical re-releases that the restorations will grant them, is hardly superfluous.
An 8K restoration would last them 2 or 3 decades (or more,) the decision to future-proof them for a while is a great one by Disney.
As for your doubts that people will have 8K equipment at home.
It will happen. Look at TV's 10 years ago.
Things will continue to improve and 8K resolution will eventually make it's way into homes.
Theatrical re-releases will also benefit.
$500K now is better than $250K now + $300K in 10 years + $400K in 20 years.

The Snow White cover-art got leaked out so early because it was the big October Platinum. The cover-arts for nearly all other releases wouldn't be released until around three or four months before coming out. So it shouldn't be too long till we see the cover-art for Dumbo (and Fantasia hopefully).Just.A.Friend wrote:Does anyone know how long it usually takes on average before we get some cover art of a release? I thought that I had seen Snow White cover art back in January in one of the threads on this site, but I'm not positive.
Seems like we should be getting some Dumbo cover art, and even Fantasia soon too.