Gay: for or against

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.

how do you feel about people being gay?

i think its ok
19
41%
i dont like it
8
17%
its in the bible... it says no
8
17%
i dont care
11
24%
 
Total votes: 46

User avatar
Chernabog
Special Edition
Posts: 945
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 1:56 pm
Location: Malmo, Sweden

Post by Chernabog »

Kim Olav Svines wrote:If I should end up with children someday, I would not like them exposed to homosexuality, becuase of my moral views. I'm not religious, so this is the views I've concluded with, and homosexuality is another factor in the decay of society.
:twisted:
So do you have an opinion of what you will do IF one of your future children will be homosexual?
Because you don´t became homosexual just through being exposed to homosexuals - you are born with it and a person can stay hided if he/she fights it, but it will not disappear from that person how much he/she tries.
It´s not a sickness - it´s a personality and originality, like in you and me and everyone else on this earth - homosexual or not!
User avatar
Kim Olav Svines
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:15 am

Post by Kim Olav Svines »

That is your opinion. I don't believe that genes, heritage etc. is the only factor. But IF it should be a part of it, you may as well call it a sickness. People are born mentally challenged, without arms etc. which is abnormal and a tragedy for those affected.
User avatar
Son of the Morning
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Son of the Morning »

Kim Olav Svines wrote:That is your opinion. I don't believe that genes, heritage etc. is the only factor. But IF it should be a part of it, you may as well call it a sickness. People are born mentally challenged, without arms etc. which is abnormal and a tragedy for those affected.
I can only hope that you never reproduce, or that no offspring of yours ever has to go through the ordeal of being homosexual under an intolerant parent such as yourself.

When people come out of the closet, it is undeniably hard for them, and support of the people they come out to is crucial. I can just imagine a teenager coming out to a parent, only to have the parent be repulsed or angry, telling themselves (and their child!) that this is some premeditated or planned moral aberrance.

And no, I'm not gay.
User avatar
pinkrenata
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1915
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:33 pm
Location: Mini Van Highway
Contact:

Post by pinkrenata »

Kim Olav Svines wrote: People are born mentally challenged, without arms etc. which is abnormal and a tragedy for those affected.
I have a very good friend who is severely disabled and, while it is something that you might deem "abnormal", it most definitely cannot be considered a tragedy. You are born the way you are, and you would not be yourself if you were born any differently. And I feel that that would be the real tragedy.
User avatar
ohmahaaha
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Norristown, PA

Post by ohmahaaha »

Religion should have never, ever been brought into the whole picture with this. How can anyone here on Earth truly say what God's position on this is?? Even if someone thinks that they know what God's position on this would be - based on their interpretation of biblical text - who are they to dare to speak for God - on this or any issue?

But while Religion and biblical text is in the picture, let's talk about it for a second or two. Fact: in all of the Gospels, check the rubrics my friends, Jesus Christ never, ever said anything against or denouncing homosexuality. Never. Nada. Zip. Zilcho. Nothing. (Stick with me on this, it's for your own good.) BUT - what Jesus DOES speak out against, and denounce as sinful, is divorce. So, why aren't all these people so outspoken recently about gays being priests/bishops/whatever, speaking out against people who are divorced in the same positions? Why aren't divorced people being surrounded by groups of married people and being beaten to death? Why aren't divorced people disallowed to apply for a marriage license a second time? See? It's easy to interpret Biblical text to make a point, isn't it?

Let's face it, what this is all about religiously is one or two right wing extremist Christians - and extremist Christians are just as scary as extremists in other religions, folks - decided that they didn't like the idea of homosexuality so they spoke out publicly and have found a lot of people who are just as uncomfortable about it. And what it is all about politically is money - nobody up top wants to come out (no pun intended) for it for fear that they might lose some of those large campaign contributions for companies fearful of public outcry against them; not to mention not wanting to allow same sex partners to be entitled to the same kind of benefits that married heterosexuals are entitled to. Funny, though - I always though publicly elected officials were supposed to uphold the laws of the constitution, which applies to all citizens - ALL CITIZENS. Aren't all of these people citizens? Aren't all of these people ... people? Take a good look at that bumper sticker in front of you, folks, that says "What would Jesus do?" What do you think Jesus would do? Mind you, don't ask yourself "What would the Pope say Jesus would do?" or "What would Billy Graham say Jesus would do?" or "What would Pat Robertson say Jesus would do?" Ask yourself what you really think Jesus would do. And if you still can't deal with it, ask yourself why you really care?

Get over it, give them what they are due via their constitutional rights, let them be married and love each other until death do them part, they are not going to warp the Family in America, they are not going to warp the thinking of "our children," you cannot control what your children see and hear - then mind your own business and move on with your life.
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

I've been reading this thread but didn't want to mix myself in the conversation, but ohmahaaha, I agree with everything you said :wave: :thumb:
User avatar
ohmahaaha
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Norristown, PA

Post by ohmahaaha »

PatrickvD wrote:
I've been reading this thread but didn't want to mix myself in the conversation, but ohmahaaha, I agree with everything you said
Thanks, brother! Peace!! 8) [/b]
User avatar
MickeyMouseboy
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3470
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: ToonTown

Post by MickeyMouseboy »

ohmahaaha wrote:Religion should have never, ever been brought into the whole picture with this. How can anyone here on Earth truly say what God's position on this is?? Even if someone thinks that they know what God's position on this would be - based on their interpretation of biblical text - who are they to dare to speak for God - on this or any issue?

But while Religion and biblical text is in the picture, let's talk about it for a second or two. Fact: in all of the Gospels, check the rubrics my friends, Jesus Christ never, ever said anything against or denouncing homosexuality.
ok this is my favorite part :D God's position to everything is in his inspired word the bible. while many religions have their own interpretations, he bible has only one meaning and it has to harmonize completely from beginning to end since it was inspired by God. If something contradicts then some interpretation you made has to be erronious and many religions today don't care to see that. Many of their beliefs don't hamonize with the whole bible. but anyways there are scriptures in the old and new testament that are against homosexual acts. even Jesus spoke of this! This scriptures were inspiered by God an are his views on this. while the word homosexuality is not in the bible it refers to it as fornication Greek word "Por.nei'a" Hebrew word "za.nah" mean either straight or gay sex,bestiality, prostitution, etc..

we read at Romans 1:26, 27, according to The New Testament in Modern English by J. B. Phillips:
"God therefore handed them over to disgraceful passions. Their women exchanged the normal practices of sexual intercourse for something which is abnormal and unnatural. Similarly the men, turning from natural intercourse with women, were swept into lustful passions for one another. Men with men performed these shameful horrors, receiving, of course, in their own personalities the consequences of sexual perversity."
we read at 1 Corinthians 6:9, 10:
"Make no mistake: no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion . . . will possess the kingdom of God." (The New English Bible)


Or

as the verse is paraphrased in The Living Bible:
"Homosexuals-will have no share in his kingdom."

But an honest examination of the words of Jesus, shows that he, too, did indeed speak against homosexuality.

He said, as recorded at Matthew 19:9 according to the Revised Standard Version (RSV):
"Whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery."
The Greek word for "unchastity" that Matthew here employs in penning Jesus' words is por·nei'a. Por·nei'a is related to the verb por·neu'o, meaning "to give one's self to unlawful sexual intercourse."

The best way to understand what is taken in by these terms is to find out how they are used in other places. A similar word appears in the Bible at Jude 7 in describing the sin of certain ancient cities:
"Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally [an intensive form of por·neu'o] and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire." (RSV)


For what type of 'immorality' or por·nei'a were those at Sodom and Gomorrah condemned? The Bible narrative at Genesis 19:4, 5 answers:
"The men of Sodom, surrounded the house, from boy to old man, all the people in one mob. And they kept calling out to Lot and saying to him: 'Where are the men who came in to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intercourse with them.'"
These men of Sodom and Gomorrah were homosexuals. In fact, the English word "sodomy," which particularly means 'intercourse between two men,' is drawn from the name of the city of Sodom. The Bible would call their sin por·nei'a. Jesus said por·nei'a was so wrong morally that it was a basis for severing the marriage bond.

Further more Jesus was a Jew living under the Law which stated:
That Law included among its injunctions: "Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence." - Lev. 18:22
Por·nei'a, the word used by Jesus, obviously embraced this command of God. Also, it should be noted that homosexuality had been condemned by God before the law of Moses was even given. The account about Sodom and Gomorrah, referred to earlier, proves this fact; those cities were destroyed by God over 400 years before the law of Moses came into existence. Jesus was aware of that.-Luke 17:28, 29, 32. Beyond doubt, therefore, Jesus did in fact condemn all such 'unchaste' practices as homosexuality. As reason would indicate to us, the Bible is consistent on this matter. Paul's words are backed up by the authority of the Son of God. This doesn't mean God doesn't love them cause he does! John 3:16 says "God loved the world so much" it doesn't say he only loved people that were faithful to him but he said all the world including sinners but what he doesn't approve is their lifestyle. the scriptures goes on to say "the he gave his only begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life" here it gives a promessing future for all the people that stumble in satan's lies or the desires of our inperfect bodies, if we repent and work to gain God favor we can earn this everlasting life!
User avatar
bean:therio
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by bean:therio »

How can you be 'in favor of' or 'against' homosexuality? It is not like a political party or something. Just leave that stuff where it should be: in the realms of those involved. And for those who think it is a religious issue: there's countless of 'crimes' in the bible that, if you would want to be a 'real' Christian, would require you to KILL your family/neighbors/friends if you saw that person performing that certain activity. Just this week I read the infamous 'Letter to Dr. Laura' (see http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp ) which gives some examples of those. So the bible agrees to slavery and killing those who work on a sunday but not to the love between two people? I think that (especially in the case of the old testament) it is all a matter of perspective and living your live in accordance with the 'idea' of Christianity. I do and I have no trouble with the subject of homosexuality: it is none of my business and I shouldn't look down at people who are gay.
You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
User avatar
MickeyMouseboy
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3470
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: ToonTown

Post by MickeyMouseboy »

bean:therio wrote:How can you be 'in favor of' or 'against' homosexuality? It is not like a political party or something. Just leave that stuff where it should be: in the realms of those involved. And for those who think it is a religious issue: there's countless of 'crimes' in the bible that, if you would want to be a 'real' Christian, would require you to KILL your family/neighbors/friends if you saw that person performing that certain activity. Just this week I read the infamous 'Letter to Dr. Laura' (see http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp ) which gives some examples of those. So the bible agrees to slavery and killing those who work on a sunday but not to the love between two people? I think that (especially in the case of the old testament) it is all a matter of perspective and living your live in accordance with the 'idea' of Christianity. I do and I have no trouble with the subject of homosexuality: it is none of my business and I shouldn't look down at people who are gay.
While that is true it was only under the Law, The law is not valid anymore thanks to Jesus ransom sacrifice! :)
User avatar
poco
Special Edition
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 10:40 am
Location: looking for the blue fairy

Post by poco »

MMB

why do you contradict yourself?
"I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells. Fantasy is a necessary ingredient in living." -- Dr. Seuss
User avatar
MickeyMouseboy
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3470
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: ToonTown

Post by MickeyMouseboy »

poco wrote:MMB

why do you contradict yourself?
How am I contradicting? just because you are not suppose to make sacrafices or kill someone and saying what God said about homosexuality in the Law is not contradicting :) Once Jesus died Jews or anyone professing the Christian faith didnt have to sacrifice animals since Jesus sacrfice ransom all. that's why the Law is void in that sense. so please explain Ms Poco Dearest.
User avatar
ohmahaaha
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Norristown, PA

Post by ohmahaaha »

Sorry MMBOY but it doesn't wash with me.

It was told to me by someone who has studied the Bible extensively - namely, a Priest - that Paul's letters in speaking out against homosexuality were done so to get the readers that the letter was written to move away from the ways of the Romans and Roman society and Roman practices. Homosexuality was a common practice among Roman citizens. And Rome nearly took over the world - maybe that's why people are so paranoid about homosexuality!

And I do not see how Jesus in speaking of divorce in the passage you quoted refers to homosexuality, unless like in your case and so many others, you want it to.
STASHONE
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 5:32 pm

Post by STASHONE »

Someone change the title of this thread to: Religion, prime scapegoat for ignorance...
User avatar
Son of the Morning
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Son of the Morning »

STASHONE wrote:Someone change the title of this thread to: Religion, prime scapegoat for ignorance...
How about "Religion, prime excuse for personal intolerance?"

And here's a little something to chew on, MMB: Something cannot prove its own validity, like you just had the Bible try to do. Basically, the extent of what you said was this:

Person A) The Word of God cannot be truly known, for all written texts are produced in some part by man.
Person B) Ah, but the Bible, a written text produced in some part by man says other wise!

Sorry, doesn't fly.
User avatar
Grunches
Special Edition
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 12:20 am
Location: On A Magic Carpet
Contact:

Post by Grunches »

ohmahaaha wrote:Sorry MMBOY but it doesn't wash with me.

It was told to me by someone who has studied the Bible extensively - namely, a Priest - that Paul's letters in speaking out against homosexuality were done so to get the readers that the letter was written to move away from the ways of the Romans and Roman society and Roman practices. Homosexuality was a common practice among Roman citizens. And Rome nearly took over the world - maybe that's why people are so paranoid about homosexuality!

And I do not see how Jesus in speaking of divorce in the passage you quoted refers to homosexuality, unless like in your case and so many others, you want it to.
I really didn't want to get involved either but to try and back MMBOY look at Leviticus 19
'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
User avatar
Son of the Morning
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Son of the Morning »

Grunches wrote:I really didn't want to get involved either but to try and back MMBOY look at Leviticus 19
'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
Okay, fine.

Image

GOD HATES SHRIMP
goofystitch
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Walt Disney World

Post by goofystitch »

I don't mind that people are gay, but I don't want to see it, and especially not in public, family friendly places like Disney World. I understand that gay people are in love and want to be out and about on romantic dates like heterosexual couples are, but in public, two men/woman doing more than holding hands is sickening. The way I feel about that kind of behavior is that there are places where that is alloud and even expected, and malls/theme parks/hotel pools where children are present are not them. I don't mean to offend anybody, but please don't do that in public.
User avatar
Paka
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Paka »

Whoops... heh. :P

Here's that image SotM was linking to...

Image

...oh dear, this means I'm a doomed little girl, for - *gasp* - loving seafood. I can't help it... I lahks shrimp! Is that so wrong?! *sob*

:lol:
Last edited by Paka on Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paka
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Paka »

Out of sight, out of mind - eh, goofystitch? :roll:

So... how is a heterosexual couple mackin' on each other in public less gross than a homosexual couple? I personally feel just as awkward with either. But hell, there's no law against PDA now, is there? *shrug*
Locked