Which would you rather have?

2099net · Post by **2099net** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 5:59 am

I'd rather have 6 arms. Perhaps if I had superior interllect, I could generically engineer myself some!

STASHONE · Post by **STASHONE** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:04 am

first you'd have to work on spelling genetically right.

2099net · Post by **2099net** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am

No. I meant it would be so difficult, I would be an old man when I finally did.

STASHONE · Post by **STASHONE** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:20 am

haha or as a result of your prolonged innovation, by the time you finally reached creation we would all conventionally have had 6 arms through constructive artificial evolution thanks to my super genius, thus establishing the notion a generic concept.

2099net · Post by **2099net** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:25 am

Cool. Just think what we could all do with six arms each!

(And no Evil Arms like Doctor Octopus!)

Really to be serious, if you have the brainpower, you should be able to achieve most of the other items on the list - especially job and money.

STASHONE · Post by **STASHONE** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:17 am

but intelligence and motivation are two totally seperate commodities.

DEREKG · Post by **DEREKG** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:53 pm

STASHONE wrote:
Rebel wrote: A, C, and D would probably give you more potential partners, but it would not guarantee that you would get B.
with my extraordinary unparalleled einsteinien intellect and expert knowledge of quantum physics, i'd construct a superpowered time displacement vessel out of an old stainless steel dmc model prototype able to reach light speeds that could transcend the three dimensional fabrics of the space time continuum, equiped with a dash mounted flux capacitor to employ the hierarchical structure of the cosmos as my stopwatch, and travel back to 1982 to scoop phoebe cates.

Phoebe Cates, MEOW!!! How I miss the 80's...

PatrickvD · Post by **PatrickvD** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:35 pm

give me the breathtaking beauty... it's been proven that attractive people get better jobs and relationships, so answer D will eventually lead to A and B.. and C.... who needs that anyway, geez

Wonderlicious · Post by **Wonderlicious** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 5:52 pm

Loomis wrote: I stand by my original comment that this whole thing smacks of Christianity. Christianity is an OK idea, it is just that the followers are thick and ordinary.

Don't mean to be a fussy pot, Loomis, but I think it would be a good idea to edit that a bit to say that some Christians are thick and ordinary...

...like George W Bush. The W stands for Walker, although I think the "l" should be replaced by another letter

disneywb · Post by **disneywb** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 10:36 pm

I'm a B, no matter how much I think I want $, power, or intelligence, I know I'm a homebody at heart

Teen Artist · Post by **Teen Artist** » Sat Nov 20, 2004 11:53 pm

This thread is pretty funny, and I don't think that was Lady's original intention. Is it safe to say Loomis is a non-conformist?

I don't think any of those choices really suit me well.
A - Too materialistic and worldly for my outlook on life
B - I'm not really a people person, and though I do want a family, I don't need them to be perfect. They should be eccentric and poorly-adjusted just like me.
C - My current level of intelligence is fine with me (not on a Shakespearian or Einsteinian level, however). There are some things you don't want answers to. I think it would be depressing to have ultimate knowledge.
D - I'm also fine with my looks and charisma.

So, in conclusion, I would just like to live a stress-free, content life. Specifically, to be able to pursue my artistic goals and be around people I love.

Lady · Post by **Lady** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:16 am

Teen Artist wrote:This thread is pretty funny, and I don't think that was Lady's original intention. Is it safe to say Loomis is a non-conformist?

I don't think any of those choices really suit me well.
A - Too materialistic and worldly for my outlook on life
B - I'm not really a people person, and though I do want a family, I don't need them to be perfect. They should be eccentric and poorly-adjusted just like me.
C - My current level of intelligence is fine with me (not on a Shakespearian or Einsteinian level, however). There are some things you don't want answers to. I think it would be depressing to have ultimate knowledge.
D - I'm also fine with my looks and charisma.

So, in conclusion, I would just like to live a stress-free, content life. Specifically, to be able to pursue my artistic goals and be around people I love.

Hmm. . . now I know what would make a great option (E): Satisfaction and Contentment

Loomis · Post by **Loomis** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:48 am

Wonderlicious wrote:
Loomis wrote: I stand by my original comment that this whole thing smacks of Christianity. Christianity is an OK idea, it is just that the followers are thick and ordinary.
Don't mean to be a fussy pot, Loomis, but I think it would be a good idea to edit that a bit to say that some Christians are thick and ordinary...

I've said far worse about Christians on this site, so I'm not backing down now, Fussy Pot

Teen Artist · Post by **Teen Artist** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:31 am

Lady wrote:Hmm. . . now I know what would make a great option (E): Satisfaction and Contentment

Cool! I pick that one.

Loomis wrote:I've said far worse about Christians on this site, so I'm not backing down now, Fussy Pot

I don't have a problem with your non-pc comment, but being Christian myself, I think it's funny that we can all be lumped together as thick and ordinary, yet still be strongly divided in what we believe.

Loomis · Post by **Loomis** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:44 pm

Teen Artist wrote: I don't have a problem with your non-pc comment, but being Christian myself, I think it's funny that we can all be lumped together as thick and ordinary, yet still be strongly divided in what we believe.

And that is my basic problem with Christianity. There isn't one Christianity - there are several.

None of you can agree on the "correct way to worship" and all of you believe that you way is the one and only correct way (see a long running argument in the 'Do You Read the Bible' thread).

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:46 pm

what's fussy pot?

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:49 pm

Lady wrote:If God said you could have ONE of the following, which would you pick?

A) A brilliant career and lots of money
B) A spouse who is your soulmate and well-adjusted children
C) Genius-level intelligence (Einstein, Shakespeare)
D) Breathtaking beauty and charisma

Well?

Assume that you can go through this life time with only one of the above (realizing that most people never achieve any of the above). Basically ask yourself which has the biggest priority for you.

I already have C and D. Working on A. and B i really dont want. my biggest priority is buying every bloody DVD released! that's my purpose in life!

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

Which would you rather have?

Re: Which would you rather have?