Would you like reviews of some Touchstone and Miramax DVDs?
- DisneyChris
- Special Edition
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: Hong Kong
- The Monkey's Uncle
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: United States
- The Monkey's Uncle
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: United States
- MickeyMousePal
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6629
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:40 pm
- Location: The Incredibles LA!!!
- Contact:
- MickeyMouseboy
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:35 pm
- Location: ToonTown
- Lucylover1986
- Special Edition
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:25 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
- deathie mouse
- Ultraviolet Edition
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 1:12 am
- Location: Alea jacta est
By the way , oh my brothers and sisters, seeing the popularity of this subject, there's also a topic in the Feedback section where you can leave (what else) feedback and opinions about the UD Reviews themselves, in case you haven't seen it yet (in hindsight maybe i should have posted it in the general section where it might have been more visible, but since it was about feedback, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.)
The preceding has been a public dethi announcement
The preceding has been a public dethi announcement
- DisneyChris
- Special Edition
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: Hong Kong
That's really funny, MMB. Never thought of that. But I agree, it's a bit weird for a review of Malena to be right next to a review of a Mickey Mouse DVD...MickeyMouseboy wrote:I like the Idea but..........I don't think they would fit in the main page. Today we have Miramax's Malena Special Edition review up! just doesnt fit in and R rated movie in a Disney page?
Sure. I wouldnt mind seeing some other family movies released under BVHE's other companies. But, obviously, we wouldn't be seeing anything like Kill Bill here. I think the site's main priority should be Disney fims, but if Luke or any others have the time and energy to review other of Disney's Co. family films, go right ahead!
-
SofaKing381222
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: Sugar Land, TX
- Contact:
-
I am the Doctor
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:37 pm
While I wouldn't mind seeing more reviews-I think the movies should stay in the Children's/Family category. A review of Ella Enchanted (great movie, by the way
)would be great, a review of Kill Bill is out of place. I also think it would be a wonderful idea to review some of the other animated DVDs out there (the Looney Tunes, Hanna Barbera and especially the Dreamworks stuff), as I suspect that many of the members here are fans of not only Disney animation, but animation in general. 
I think that it's an interesting issue. On the one hand, I'd like to have as many UD reviews as possible. But on the other hand, as "I am the Doctor" said, I think that something like Kill Bill might be out of place. Would you get to request certain titles from Buena Vista/etc. or would they just send you whatever they'd like to, in order to get out more publicity? I always thought that it was the latter with Disney's titles, but I could be wrong.
If it were the former then I'd suggest only requesting titles that you think the readers would be interested in, but then the question of where to draw the line comes up. Is Kill Bill okay? Is The Village okay? You could possibly have a policy of only reviewing films that are rated PG-13 or under (as some Disney films themselves are PG-13) but that ends up excluding alot of big releases such as the King Arthur - Unrated edition.
I do think that either way, even if you decide to just review more "family-oriented" films, then they should still be seperate from the list of Disney titles. As I said before, I'd like as many UD reviews as possible, but what you decide to review really depends on how you view the site itself, is it "family-friendly" or not?
If it were the former then I'd suggest only requesting titles that you think the readers would be interested in, but then the question of where to draw the line comes up. Is Kill Bill okay? Is The Village okay? You could possibly have a policy of only reviewing films that are rated PG-13 or under (as some Disney films themselves are PG-13) but that ends up excluding alot of big releases such as the King Arthur - Unrated edition.
I do think that either way, even if you decide to just review more "family-oriented" films, then they should still be seperate from the list of Disney titles. As I said before, I'd like as many UD reviews as possible, but what you decide to review really depends on how you view the site itself, is it "family-friendly" or not?
- The Monkey's Uncle
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: United States
- Just Myself
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Pawnee, IN
- Contact:
I've asked Luke if I could be a reviewer. If he says 'yes', I promise reviews for Sixth Sense, Signs, Bringing Down the House, Big Trouble, Bionicle the Movie: Mask of Light and Bionicle 2: Legends of Metru Nui. I promise to bring reviews worthy of the reviews online now.
VOTE JUST MYSELF IN 2004!
j/k
VOTE JUST MYSELF IN 2004!
Cheers,
JM
JM
I think reviews of touchstone films would be great Luke and Id vote for it, however for what its worth, Id be less enthusistic about miramax, simply because touchstone grew out of disney and was always an extension of disney. Miramax being more of an aquistion, always feels to me that its something disney has control over only finacially as opposed to creatively, Miramax I always associate with Harvey wienstein. Apart from maybe Ella Enchanted, miramax films even there adult ones seldom feel like there even remotely connected to the disney co. I suppose the same could be said for some touchstone films. However, films like Hidalgo, Count of Monte Cristo, even 'the village' seem like borderline disney 'mature' films anyway. Whatever you decide to do I look forward to it. This site just gets better and better!!
I say definately YES to Touchstone but NO to Miramax.
Miramax movies are not Disney
Look for the problems with Farenheit earlier this year for an example.
The company is bought up by Disney but was existing long before that.
But Touchstone is another matter. It´s started by DIsney and is counted as Disney by the DIsney archives in Burbank.
So yes, please, review some of the Touchstone pictures (and maybe some of the old Hollywood Pictures as well).
- The Monkey's Uncle
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: United States
-
Captain Hook
- Special Edition
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:16 am
I have always wanted this to be a part of the site -- it was my first request when I joined UD.
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=492
I agree that it should be the more "family" films. Touchstone would be great, Miramax/Dimensions would be okay with movies like Ella and Spy Kids.
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=492
I agree that it should be the more "family" films. Touchstone would be great, Miramax/Dimensions would be okay with movies like Ella and Spy Kids.
Wow, Captain Hook. Now there's a name I've not seen in over 5 months! Well this particular Captain Hook. Where you been, friend? Welcome back! Congrats on being #7 in the countdown! 
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
