Mickey and Daisy were off-model in some shots, but I did like Donald's animation. What I found really odd though was Clarabelle being the only character in her '30s design. She stuck out like a sore thumb. I wonder why they did that.

Mickey and Daisy were off-model in some shots, but I did like Donald's animation. What I found really odd though was Clarabelle being the only character in her '30s design. She stuck out like a sore thumb. I wonder why they did that.
Not all human characters looked off. The ones they got right, IMO, were Aladdin, Jasmine, Merlin, Stromboli, Milo Thatch, Christopher Robin, Mowgli, Prince Arthur, Lilo, Mulan, Belle, Quasimodo, Jafar, Madame Medusa, Morgana, the Red Queen, the Mad Hatter, Cody from The Rescuers Down Under, Peter Pan, Wendy, John, Michael, Jim Hawkins, and Tiana.Farerb wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:12 amThe animation for Mickey and Friends was fine in Once Upon a Studio, the human characters were the ones that looked off.DisneyFan09 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:16 pm Wow, that was truly good animation!It was far superior to the likes of Once Upon a Studio and Disenchanted!
I don't believe him when he says that there's no hand-drawn work in the pipeline when we have that Tiana series, which has been reported many, many times to be hand-drawn animated, for Disney+ in the works over at Walt Disney Animation Studios in Vancouver along with it being worked on in its alredy-established lot in Burbank, which Henn was rumored to be educating the people over there to work on to get the hand-drawn style right before he retired. He can't call that story "not meaningful" when many people think that series is meaningful for many reasons. I think what he means to say is no hand-drawn movies in the works in the pipeline.Farerb wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:54 pm I listened to half of the Bancroft Brothers podcast with Mark Henn and he said that he finally decided to leave Disney because he didn't find the work fulfilling and that there isn't any hand drawn work in the pipeline. He also said that only two trainees remained from the hand drawn program and that Eric Goldberg might retire soon as well.
He also said that he submitted ideas for features during the pandemic but none were approved. Apparently he wanted to direct a feature for a long time but they never let him do that. Two of his ideas were eventually made by someone else (Valiant and Planes).
He also explained that the reason Disney didn't continue with hand drawn features is because that meant to create another studio within a studio and it was too expensive and they couldn't justify that.
https://bancroftbros.libsyn.com/mark-henn
You're wrong. The company is not dead, that's a sentiment only those online grifters say and I think we should be the opposite of them and not repeat their vitriolic rhetoric. It's not a eulogy, it's a celebration. And if this short film gets nominated and wins the Oscar for Best Animated Short, it'll force Disney to not shut it down.Farerb wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 11:58 pm In its 100 year, I think it's time to acknowledge that the Disney Company is dead and is never coming back.
Like I said a while ago, this was really a eulogy for Disney Animation:
https://youtu.be/gB90me0aqSY?si=GSPhmwmxr0RTLsfi
So, the Tiana series wasn't meaningful to him, even when he allegedly spent time helping educate the animators in WDAS Vancouver on getting the show's hand-drawn animated style right?Farerb wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:53 am Coincidentally, an article came out today:
Disney Legend Mark Henn Says He May Have Not Retired “If The Work Had Been More Meaningful”
https://www.cartoonbrew.com/studios/ret ... 36985.html
Dang, now I feel bad for Mark Henn. I think he would make a fine feature film given his experience with mostly John Musker and Ron Clements and I wonder what his ideas wereFarerb wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:54 pm He also said that he submitted ideas for features during the pandemic but none were approved. Apparently he wanted to direct a feature for a long time but they never let him do that. Two of his ideas were eventually made by someone else (Valiant and Planes).
He also explained that the reason Disney didn't continue with hand drawn features is because that meant to create another studio within a studio and it was too expensive and they couldn't justify that.
Considering Tiana has been allegedly and reportedly said to be hand-drawn animated over and over and over again, I don't think they were lying. Maybe they just don't know what is the best idea for a succesful big mainstream hand-drawn animated film.DisneyJedi wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:29 am Not to be all doom and gloom, but were they just lying about bringing back (or interest in bringing back) hand-drawn as more full-scale or whatever and training new animators on the medium?![]()
It's not wishful thinking if PEOPLE I TALKED TO WHO CLAIMS TO HAVE FRIENDS WORKING ON THE SHOW say Tiana is hand-drawn.
No she didn't. You see what you want to see. It was in a Spanish, not French, interview actually, and she said "[Disney+] is a really good platform to start playing with things that have meant a lot to a lot of us." You can't get any more vague and non-committal than that.D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:07 amEven Jennifer Lee in a French interview that was translated into English said something along the lines of "Tiana will be traditionally animated."
Then why did she also say this when talking about Tiana?Sotiris wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:51 amNo she didn't. You see what you want to see. It was in a Spanish, not French, interview actually, and she said "[Disney+] is a really good platform to start playing with things that have meant a lot to a lot of us." You can't get any more vague and non-committal than that.D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:07 amEven Jennifer Lee in a French interview that was translated into English said something along the lines of "Tiana will be traditionally animated."
She wasn't saying that about Tiana. She was speaking in general. But even if she were talking about Tiana in that instance, what she said was very ambiguous. She could have easily be referring to the animation style of Wish, not real 2D animation.D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:19 amThen why did she also say this when talking about Tiana?
"How technology has allowed us to maintain the importance of traditional animation through artists is what excites me the most."
Sorry but I don't believe that. I don't at all. I just don't. Because people like Grace Randolph, iCritic, Skyler Shuler, etc, they've all heard, from friends they know, that Tiana IS HAND-DRAWN ANIMATED, even Grace when she said she heard 2025 for Tiana's release because they want more time on getting its hand-drawn animated style right.Sotiris wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:47 pmShe wasn't saying that about Tiana. She was speaking in general. But even if she were talking about Tiana in that instance, what she said was very ambiguous. She could have easily be referring to the animation style of Wish, not real 2D animation.D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:19 amThen why did she also say this when talking about Tiana?
"How technology has allowed us to maintain the importance of traditional animation through artists is what excites me the most."
I asked a general question in the "Hand-Drawn Animation Dead at Disney" thread. If you want to talk about Tiana, you can do it in its own thread.D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 8:02 amWe're not talking about films, we're talking about Tiana. Stop trying to move goalposts.