Disney's Divinity wrote: ↑Fri Jun 02, 2023 1:28 pm
Interesting that two people have liked
Mistress of Evil more than the first
Maleficent now, that's a little surprising for me! I do think Michelle Pfeiffer's character was a better villain than Stefan (the pronunciation of Stefan in that film always irked me

).
More surprising to see
Through the Looking Glass higher than the first
Alice though, that one let my expectations down since I'd expected it to be better than the first what with having more focus on the White and Red Queens (the only good thing in the first). Time ended up being the only really good thing about it for me.
For the record, I actually love both through the Looking Glass and mistress of evil way better than their predecessors

I’ll never understand how anyone can actually like the first maleficent, when it is such an abomination not only as a disrespect to the original animated movie, but also having literally the most annoying movie characters in history that are even worse than Jar Jar Binks (And I’m not even a Star Wars fan!) (The pixies). Also what you said, having Stefan Be bastardized is such a psychotic character that I find it hard to believe how anyone would night of try to rebel against him, even as their king.Not to mention that it just has such bad ideas like Diaval Becoming human (no disrespect to the actor, Sam Riley, At all who I actually think is quite a good actor, but it’s just a very weird idea overall), And then having Aurora act so kiddish, I mean she’s having mud fights and rolling around in the leaves? And just with some of the faerie land creatures Looking very childish and inconsistent with most of the other creatures and visual style of the rest of the movie. Mistress of evil on the other hand is actually more competently made and doesn’t have any of those issues,And even almost made me cry during a certain moment towards the end;And remember, I strongly dislike the first Maleficent And I rarely cry at movies, so what does that tell you?
I find through the looking glass to also be extremely underrated. It’s actually quite inspiring, not to mention very interesting and feels authentically like something that Lewis Carroll would’ve wrote, despite one critical wrote literally asking “what does this have to do with Lewis Carroll?”Having studied Lewis Carroll in university, I can objectively state that this criticism is invalid and through the looking glass authentically created/added on new things that could’ve happened within Lewis Carroll’s works
