estefan wrote:To be entirely honest, I don't understand the opposition against setting a fantasy film in present day.
I think you misunderstood. I don't oppose movies, TV shows or stories in general doing that, I just don't want WDAS doing it. It's just not part of their legacy. There's not a single WDAS film set at the time it was made that includes magic.
farerb wrote:To me it's not about fantasy, but I do like when Disney films have a "once upon a time-y" feeling to them and modern settings kind of takes that away (like with The Princess and the Frog).
Yes, with modern settings you lose that fairytale quality in a story.
farerb wrote:Though I'll say that having a surname doesn't really mean "modern settings", surnames/family names/house names are not a modern concept- moreover if the film is about a royal family. Mulan had a surname, the Darling children as well, non of them felt out of place.
I'm not saying surnames=modern setting. I'm just saying Disney avoids giving characters last names in general, but especially when they inhabit a pre-modern world. The source material of the movies you mentioned already included the surnames and that's why they were used. Disney doesn't go out of its way to give last names to characters in original stories unless they're set in the present. Judy Hopps, Hiro Hamada, Lilo Pelekai are examples of that. Even when it came Moana, her last name from a previous iteration of the story, Waikiki, was dropped and wasn't used in the final film. I think that shows a pattern. I hope I'm wrong though and Encanto is in fact set in ye olden days.