Disney's Divinity wrote:Disney Duster wrote:Well, we now see the case that Belle's dress doesn't look very much like the one in the film at all. I would say Cinderella's looked ever so slightly more like it's original than Belle's does. I am glad they look different, as I think the designs for a new take on a film should be new, but the designs we got for Beauty and the Beast, well, at least for Belle's yellow dress, I am not ok with, unlike Cinderella where I was ok with every costume. And I'm sure you didn't really mean the blue dress was "a rag" lol.
Well, again, as I said to you before (and have said on this forum repeatedly for years on any given topic), that is your opinion and not mine, speak for yourself only, your opinion is not fact, etc. And I’ll throw in: F***
Cinderella. I really do not give two shits about it, I won't be thinking about that trash when I watch this, and any amount of ways you find to nitpick this film for eternity won't stop it from being more successful than
Cinderella.

You were very cruel to me and my favorite live-action film, but now I have more proof I have overcome it.
On Rotten Tomatoes, Disney's live-action
Beauty and the Beast has a 70%, while Disney's live-action
Cinderella beats it by far with 83%. I won against your cruelty. Disney's live-action
Beauty and the Beast score may change, but it is still highly doubtful it will be able to beat Disney's live-action
Cinderella. I win.
Also, I found out that over Disney's animated
Beauty and the Beast at 93%,
The Little Mermaid at 92%,
Aladdin at 94%, and
The Lion King at 92%, Disney's animated
Cinderella beats them all with 97%. I win twice.
Will Disney's live-action
Beauty and the Beast be more successful monetarily than Disney's live-action
Cinderella? Probably. But we know shallow money is not what matters.
Cinderella was more successful in critical acclaim. I win.