I couldn't be happier that it's coming to Broadway at last... But, I can't help but feel, as a major fan of the original film and one of its steadfast defenders, that they're kind of letting us down by distancing themselves from the film so much. Like, "Oh, THAT piece of shit? The one you guys have loved and stood by all these years? Well, we're going to go in a DRASTIC direction from THAT." I don't know. I just wish they'd STAND UP for their original vision, instead of trying to cater to the Hugo purists, who are going to hate this regardless of what they do (which is ironic, considering that Victor Hugo HIMSELF adapted Hunchback into an opera that made even bigger changes to the source material than DISNEY'S did. Not only did Esmeralda live in the opera 'La Esmeralda,' but Frollo did as well. And Phoebus, who SURVIVES in the book, dies. It's WAY more drastic than anything Disney did, but ssh, don't tell the book's fans...)
As someone who has READ the original novel, I greatly prefer Disney's take. EVERY single character in the book is unlikeable. Not a one is a decent human being. Even Quasi is kind of an asshole in that thing, but, he at least has a reason. Phoebus is, of the main cast, the least despicable, but even he just wants to have sex with this chick and ditch her before he gets married and has to 'settle' for his (beautiful) fiancee. Esmeralda is whiny, mopey, bratty and, all in all, a total teenage girl, who spends the ENTIRE book pining for Phoebus. Frollo is a straight-up attempted rapist and a choad who has NONE and I mean NONE of the menace or deviousness of Tony Jay's portrayal. The Frollo of the book is EXACTLY like Esmeralda, only instead of pining for Phoebus, he's pining for HER, like a total teenage melodrama. And he's 35! So, he doesn't even have the excuse of, well, he's only 16... He's PATHETIC. A simpering, sniveling little man-child. HATE him. HATE, HATE, HATEEEEE book Frollo. Clopin is still cool in the book, but, he's a crusty old Gypsy and not the colorful and mysterious Master of Ceremonies Harlequin type that he is in the Animated version. And he's very minimally involved in the proceedings.
In short, I hated nearly every character in that damned book. I like the Disney version BECAUSE it's the Disney version and not an exact replica of the book. We all ready HAVE the damned book. If you want that version of the story, READ IT! It's there. So, why not stay truer to the spirit of the animated film? This is all speculation, of course, based upon what I've read of the changes that have been made. Some of them (explicitly making Frollo a former priest), I'm TOTALLY down with. But, cutting the Gargoyles? Changing Clopin so radically? Killing Esmeralda? I can't say these are making me anything other than anxious.
