Another "girl-powered film"?

Even though I know they're only saying that because of
Tangled's and
Frozen's success (we know they wouldn't say anything positive about a "girl" movie 5 years ago), I can't help but be happy about that. Tiana, Ariel, and Megara are some of my favorite characters, so I hope this film keeps them around to make more films in future. Plus, a 14-year old lead? Maybe their first female protagonist not focused on love or in a relationship?
I'm also excited because this film will definitely feature the ocean pretty heavily, which even in 3D can still be pretty beautiful. And "enormous sea creatures and mythic figures"?
Lady Cluck wrote:Name one Disney musical that doesn't have comedy.
Name one Disney film, period, that doesn't have comedy in it.
Tangled wrote:I'm just hoping that they don't rush the animation. I would be very disappointed if the earlier release date was because they discarded the innovative painterly CGI style that we kept on hearing about. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised. I'll blame Frozen and its popularity.

I wouldn't blame
Frozen--they abandoned the "painterly" idea on
Tangled.
Mach Full Force wrote:Unpopular opinion: I wish Disney would cancel/shelf this movie. Sure, POC representation is always nice, but this is Disney we're talking about. We all know that if they do include her in the Princess line, she'll just gradually be shoved into the background just like Pocahontas, Mulan and Tiana. It won't do much to help. (And before you mention Big Hero 6, keep in mind most of the marketing has been focused on Baymax rather than the mostly POC main characters, so...)
How they decide to use or not use a character in a merchandise line after the fact has no bearing on how good a character will be in the film itself. And that's all that matters, imo. Besides, non-white characters still have a right to be included in film regardless. I'm sure M&C didn't start this movie just to add another non-white character to the princess line...
Weird.