But now I realize how that sounds like Rapunzel's healing hair, AKA Tangled, was the catalyst.

Historically speaking the Reformation followed the Renaissance, so there's a another name for the newer movies: Disney Reformation.

Exactly. I'm concerned about the next films' success due to Frozen. Like Big Hero 6 could be a great film, but would suffer from the Pocahontas syndrome: comes right after a huge hit and everybody hates it and is deemed a "failure" by Disney.ProfessorRatigan wrote:For years, I've resented The Lion King's success and hoped I'd get to see it knocked off the top spot. Now that that's actually a reality, I'm a little disappointed to see it happen. Especially by a film as weak as Frozen. The Lion King has a lot of problems, but, holy hell, Frozen has about a dozen more. What'll be interesting to see is if Disney starts hyping up Frozen and comparing everything released after it negatively to it. Will they learn the lesson that they obviously HAVEN'T learned in the 20 years since TLK's release that NOT EVERYTHING IS COMPARABLE TO THAT FILM? Or will they, over the course of the next 20 years, continue the same, tired trend of seeing everything as a 'failure' in light of the unforeseen, runaway success of Frozen? It's going to interesting to see.
I also wonder if, because of its success, Frozen will be the first 'modern' film to be ushered into the 'Diamond Edition' line-up. One thing is for sure, we're going to see A LOT more Frozen merchandise in the coming years. That's for damn sure.
At least there are other films slated for production that promise to be very good too. Disney will continue trying different things. I just hope they don't stray as far from the proven winning formula as they did in the 2000's. Somehow the magic is felt more when films are musical, magical (fairytale or not), and most of all has a deep and moving story and theme, like Beauty and The Beast did with the them of inner beauty and love, or Aladdin with being yourself, or The Lion King with taking your rightful place and be responsible, or now Frozen with true love means selflessness and sacrifice. When they strayed from that with Atlantis, Treasure Planet, Chicken Little, Home on the Range, etc. and experimented with comedy, sassiness, cynical lines and no songs (or bad and unmemorable songs in a few exceptions), they had one failure after another. Even in the dark 2000's, the movies that did best were the ones that incorporated the deep themes and heartfelt plots (Lilo and Stitch with the theme of family and Brother Bear with the theme of coming of age and maturing). Now Frozen followed that formula, and was a huge hit! I hope Disney has finally learned the lesson and sticks with it. Story, Heart, Magic and Music are the four key ingredients that make a Disney movie be the Disney we all love and grew up with and have success. And a delicious villain doesn't hurt either!thedisneyspirit wrote: Exactly. I'm concerned about the next films' success due to Frozen. Like Big Hero 6 could be a great film, but would suffer from the Pocahontas syndrome: comes right after a huge hit and everybody hates it and is deemed a "failure" by Disney.
I think those movies are good, dude. Dunno what's your problem. You just seem like a hater and a nostalgia obsessed grandpa. "In my days, blah and blah were this!".Angeldude98 wrote:At least there are other films slated for production that promise to be very good too. Disney will continue trying different things. I just hope they don't stray as far from the proven winning formula as they did in the 2000's. Somehow the magic is felt more when films are musical, magical (fairytale or not), and most of all has a deep and moving story and theme, like Beauty and The Beast did with the them of inner beauty and love, or Aladdin with being yourself, or The Lion King with taking your rightful place and be responsible, or now Frozen with true love means selflessness and sacrifice. When they strayed from that with Atlantis, Treasure Planet, Chicken Little, Home on the Range, etc. and experimented with comedy, sassiness, cynical lines and no songs (or bad and unmemorable songs in a few exceptions), they had one failure after another. Even in the dark 2000's, the movies that did best were the ones that incorporated the deep themes and heartfelt plots (Lilo and Stitch with the theme of family and Brother Bear with the theme of coming of age and maturing). Now Frozen followed that formula, and was a huge hit! I hope Disney has finally learned the lesson and sticks with it. Story, Heart, Magic and Music are the four key ingredients that make a Disney movie be the Disney we all love and grew up with and have success. And a delicious villain doesn't hurt either!thedisneyspirit wrote: Exactly. I'm concerned about the next films' success due to Frozen. Like Big Hero 6 could be a great film, but would suffer from the Pocahontas syndrome: comes right after a huge hit and everybody hates it and is deemed a "failure" by Disney.
I agree with Angeldude98, and apparently so does the general public. You can buy a brand new copy of Home on the Range for five bucks. Five bucks! That's not because Disney and Walmart banded together to be generous. It's because not that many people like the movie and if they price it low enough, hopefully SOMEONE will buy a copy. And there will never be commercials touting how Atlantis or Treasure Planet are being released from the vault, again, because the general public wouldn't care, get excited, etc.thedisneyspirit wrote:I think those movies are good, dude. Dunno what's your problem. You just seem like a hater and a nostalgia obsessed grandpa. "In my days, blah and blah were this!".Angeldude98 wrote: At least there are other films slated for production that promise to be very good too. Disney will continue trying different things. I just hope they don't stray as far from the proven winning formula as they did in the 2000's. Somehow the magic is felt more when films are musical, magical (fairytale or not), and most of all has a deep and moving story and theme, like Beauty and The Beast did with the them of inner beauty and love, or Aladdin with being yourself, or The Lion King with taking your rightful place and be responsible, or now Frozen with true love means selflessness and sacrifice. When they strayed from that with Atlantis, Treasure Planet, Chicken Little, Home on the Range, etc. and experimented with comedy, sassiness, cynical lines and no songs (or bad and unmemorable songs in a few exceptions), they had one failure after another. Even in the dark 2000's, the movies that did best were the ones that incorporated the deep themes and heartfelt plots (Lilo and Stitch with the theme of family and Brother Bear with the theme of coming of age and maturing). Now Frozen followed that formula, and was a huge hit! I hope Disney has finally learned the lesson and sticks with it. Story, Heart, Magic and Music are the four key ingredients that make a Disney movie be the Disney we all love and grew up with and have success. And a delicious villain doesn't hurt either!
Let Disney experiment, for God's sakes. I'm tired of only watching fairy tales and princesses from Disney, I want new things.
So blown away that you're giving Don Bluth credit for a movie he had nothing to do with. Balto was directed by Simon Wells.filmmusic wrote: I watched Don Bluth's Balto the other day and i was blown away!
Escapay wrote:I'm calling this The Resurgence.
I prefer "The Regurgitation Era" myself.Warm Regards wrote:I always called the more recent films part of a "Rejuvenation" era.
Ok, sorry, in my mind it had remained like it was coming from the Bluth studios. (i didn't mean he directed it)DancingCrab wrote:So blown away that you're giving Don Bluth credit for a movie he had nothing to do with. Balto was directed by Simon Wells.filmmusic wrote: I watched Don Bluth's Balto the other day and i was blown away!
filmmusic wrote:I've seen hundreds of films and animation films because i LOVE animation more than anything
filmmusic wrote: watched Don Bluth's Balto the other day and i was blown away!)
To add to the corrections in this thread, Don Bluth's production company had nothing to do with Balto. Balto was made by Amblimation, Steven Spielberg's short-lived animation studio (and him and Bluth had already split up many years before Balto began production).filmmusic wrote:Ok, sorry, in my mind it had remained like it was coming from the Bluth studios. (i didn't mean he directed it)DancingCrab wrote: So blown away that you're giving Don Bluth credit for a movie he had nothing to do with. Balto was directed by Simon Wells.
But apparently it's not coming from this.
When i say I like, i mean visually. Of course i can't know the story if I haven't seen the film.estefan wrote: And you honestly don't know what films you will like or dislike. Nobody does. I've seen movies I thought I would love that I ended up not caring for as well as ones that didn't seem like my cup of tea that I ended up liking a lot.
You shouldn't judge modern Disney movies from the trailers, the trailers are terrible, bit they do it to drag in today's families and kids whom are most used to a more Alvin & The Chipmunks like children's movie.filmmusic wrote:First of all i should say i have not seen FROZEN, but I've seen like 10 minutes of it, the songs mostly.
I should say that it seems to me one of the worst Disney films.
(I had that notion even from the trailer).
and I'm saying again for the 3rd time:thelittleursula wrote:You shouldn't judge modern Disney movies from the trailers, the trailers are terrible, bit they do it to drag in today's families and kids whom are most used to a more Alvin & The Chipmunks like children's movie.filmmusic wrote:First of all i should say i have not seen FROZEN, but I've seen like 10 minutes of it, the songs mostly.
I should say that it seems to me one of the worst Disney films.
(I had that notion even from the trailer).
Most of us, despise the trailers. If you want a better feel of what the movie is like, go watch the Japanese trailer c;
However, you're still passing judgement.filmmusic wrote:and I'm saying again for the 3rd time:thelittleursula wrote: You shouldn't judge modern Disney movies from the trailers, the trailers are terrible, bit they do it to drag in today's families and kids whom are most used to a more Alvin & The Chipmunks like children's movie.
Most of us, despise the trailers. If you want a better feel of what the movie is like, go watch the Japanese trailer c;
I didn't see just the trailer.
I saw 4-5 complete songs from the movie.
That could be even more than 10 minutes of it.
But even if i had seen the trailer only, I'm not judging the story or script.
I'm judging the visual style, and 1 minute is enough for me to say if something is pleasant to my eyes or not.
Thanks RyGuy! I appreciate that! I don't think I'd qualify as a grandpa as I'm still in my early 30's. Having different opinions is great, but name calling is never cool. I choose to ignore it. We can all have different tastes and opinions, but we need to respect each other. I loved Frozen and I think they finally got it and corrected what they had been doing wrong. The results of the movies from 2000-2009 prove it! All those experiments failed! They may have their fans, obviously, but in the end they failed because that's not what most people who love Disney wanted to see and as a result the box office returns were low. In the end it is a business and they'll make what works and is successful. And it's clear that the vast majority of people prefer the classic Disney formula than having movies that keep trying to be different and flopping one after another. For those that like that sort of thing, there are plenty of other choices out there from other studios. Let Disney just be Disney! People go to a Disney movie expecting the magic! And they're not all fairytales! The Lion King, The Jungle Book, Aladdin, Pocahontas, The Hunchback, etc. All followed the formula and it worked, yet all were different! The problem is not different movies and stories, the problem is settling for something when it can be so much better! I can only imagine what the original and epic "Kingdom of the Sun" would have been like, had they followed the original director's idea. However, they decided they wanted to experiment with a comedic side and make it simpler, and we got "Emperor's New Groove" instead, which was a mild success and was met with mixed reactions. Now Frozen has once again proven that the magic touch of classic Disney still works, and people want it, hand drawn or CGI. Frozen delivered what we've been waiting for since "The Lion king". I do hope they keep making movies like that!RyGuy wrote: I agree with Angeldude98, and apparently so does the general public. You can buy a brand new copy of Home on the Range for five bucks. Five bucks! That's not because Disney and Walmart banded together to be generous. It's because not that many people like the movie and if they price it low enough, hopefully SOMEONE will buy a copy. And there will never be commercials touting how Atlantis or Treasure Planet are being released from the vault, again, because the general public wouldn't care, get excited, etc.
At the end of the day, Disney is running a business. They will make what sells. If we are lucky they will make something that is artistically beautiful and sells (rather than something that just sells like Chipmunks or Smurfs). Doubtless there will be SOME experimentation - not for experimentation sake, but more as a means of fighting against staleness (I.e., people not seeing a movie because they feel like, "been there, done that").
We get it. You don't like Disney fairy tales/musicals much. You want a Disney horror movie. You've made your point. Resorting to name calling (hater and a nostalgia obsessed grandpa) does nothing to bolster your point.