:/
Btw Sotiris you might just be the biggest twitter stalker ever

It's not so bad. It looks like between 2014 and 2020, we'll only get 3 sequels.Lnds500 wrote:*Nervous laughter which leads to tears*
Lnds500 wrote:Btw Sotiris you might just be the biggest twitter stalker ever
It has to be pressure from Disney. Disney never fully got over their sequelitis, even though they discontinued their DTV animated sequels. But they know that Pixar's films are more successful than their own, and they're taking full advantage of it. (In a weird way, Planes will fulfill the prophecy of the Circle 7 Studios.)Mr arrow wrote:I think Bugs alive is one of the better films, I've never understood why a lot of people don't like it. Regardless I find it a bit strange that a studio that has built a reputation on originality would factor in sequels as part of the game plan...I just hope that if they do they bring more to the table that Monsters University....I liked it but it was the first Pixar movie I felt a little underwhelmed by...
Nah, even I don't want any more full on sequels and I'm one of the bigger toy story nuts here. They were pushing their luck as it was with the third movie. Thankfully it turned out great in my opinion (not that there was any doubt with my avatar) but the odds are seriously stacked against them rolling that dice again. Figures crossed the most they ever do are these direct to Disney channel shorts, which I'm very much looking forward to, but it has to stop there.RyGuy wrote:I probably am in the minority here, but dear God, no more Toy Story sequels, please!
Love the shorts, and am looking forward to Toy Story of Terror, but some trilogies should stay trilogies (Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull, anyone?)
Their films aren't successful enough financially. No immediate reason to worry yet.Jules wrote:Where does this leave WDAS? Will that studio be doing sequels too?
Tangled 2qindarka wrote:Their films aren't successful enough financially. No immediate reason to worry yet.Jules wrote:Where does this leave WDAS? Will that studio be doing sequels too?
Tangled is a lot less conducive to sequels then most Pixar films. They did not make a world with a creative[*] premise which they might want to play around with some more, unlike Toy Story, Monsters Inc, Cars etc.[*][*]Lnds500 wrote:Tangled 2qindarka wrote: Their films aren't successful enough financially. No immediate reason to worry yet.
Well, Rich Moore isn't shy when it comes to doing a WiR 2. So that's a possibility.qindarka wrote: Tangled is a lot less conducive to sequels then most Pixar films. They did not make a world with a creative[*] premise which they might want to play around with some more, unlike Toy Story, Monsters Inc, Cars etc.[*][*]
*Creative in that the world features unusual elements distinct from the real world, not a qualitative judgement.
**Not that I approve of pre/sequels to those films.
If there is to be a sequel to a WDAS film, it will be for Wreck-it-Ralph due to it's premise.
"Wreck-It Ralph" was a huge hit with audiences and critics. Would you do "Wreck-It Ralph 2"?
Oh, yeah. My experience was so tremendous on this film and the animators, the designers, the story artists, the actors -- I know everyone here had a good time making the film. I've talked with John and Sarah and we would all love to visit that world again and work with those characters again. We would jump at the opportunity. We're all crossing our fingers about as far as you can cross them that we get a chance to do that.
I love this! Did Disney release that? There was that blooper on the Lion King Diamond Edition of Rafiki tripping and Simba flying out of his arms.PatrickvD wrote:
The way he probably sees it is: a budget for a Pixar sequel is far larger than a Disney animated sequel's budget and that makes it more worthwhile than a Disney animated sequel.TheValentineBros wrote:Remember when John Lasseter said, "NO! Disney animated sequels aren't okay!" Now, Pixar sequels, to him, are okay.
HYPOCRISY THY NAME IS LASSETER!