"Needs More Love: Animated Films"

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Re: "Needs More Love: Animated Films"

Post by Disney Duster »

toplaycool22 wrote:All 3 of these films NEED a attraction at Disney parks. Now, I know Tarzan has one in Disneyland, but not in Disney WORLD.
I disagree with this. Those films do not NEED an attraction in the parks before many other better films get attractions in the parks, like a lot of Walt's classics.

And from what I remember of Hunchback, Hercules, and The Great Mouse Detective, those are better than Mulan and Tarzan. At least I like them better. But I wouldn't mind The Princess and the Frog getting more love.

You know, I think you only made this thread because you consider that TV tropes page to have some importance when it really doesn't. Everything's only as important as you make it.
Image
TsWade2
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:07 pm

Re: "Needs More Love: Animated Films"

Post by TsWade2 »

toplaycool22 wrote:http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/N ... matedFilms

You go down to the Disney section, they talk about Hercules, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Rescuers Down Under, Bolt, Meet the Robinsons, and The Great Mouse Detective needing more love. I have to disagree with TV Tropes on this list.

In terms of Hunchback, while Disney has done darker films in the past successfully (I.E. Snow White, Pinocchio and Fantasia) Hunchback is not as successful with it's "dark" tones. The film is a perfect example of what was going on with the creation of the film. They wanted to try something different and darker but yet throw in the disney cliches that didn't match with the film's tone. The ONLY thing that works in this film is Frollo, that's it. Frollo is a great villain, and the song Hellfire is amazing. But that is only one component. Just because a film has one good thing about it doesn't mean it is all the way around a great film. Take Iron Lady for instance. It is only remembered because of Meryl Streep's performance but the rest of the film falls flat. Most people dislike the gargoyles because they are just throw in characters to keep with the "disney sidekick" syndrome. Quasimodo, while not a bad character, when you compare him to other portrayals like the Charles Laughton version in 1939, falls flat for sure. The songs are very good, but not memorable. there is no "Be Our Guest" or "Circle of Life" in this movie. The animation is very well done, have to admit that. But like I said, the film has to be ALL the way around good. I think because Hunchback is not adaptable for "disney", maybe Don Bluth would of handled this project better since his films had more adult subject matters with out the Disney cliches in your face.

Hercules, well it is the Aladdin wanna-be. They had good intensions but it falls flat even more than Hunchback. Hercules is really bland as a character. Aladdin is way more memorable than Hercules. There is nothing special about him. The side characters don't have stand out moments. The music doesn't work when you think about it. Gospel with Greek myths? eh NO! The only good song is "I Won't Say I'm in Love." That was nice and catchy. Hades, great villain (probably because James Woods is awesome). But like what I said about Hunchback, that is only a few good components while the rest fails. The animation is ehhh, not the best way to interpret Scarfe. I find it strange that the film did soso at the box-office and it still got a TV series and a tv film (though it did not last long). Plus Hercules is featured quite a lot in Kingdom Hearts and it isn't even that popular. Disney was just desperate for a hit at the time and since both Pocahontas and Hunchback turned everyone off by being too dramatic, this was their answer. Not the best one. Also, the story has WAY too familiar stolen storylines (Superman and Rocky). I know, you are gonna say "What about Lilo & Stitch? It has E.T. written all over it." Not really, it may sort of a connection to E.T. it was still a good stand alone film.

The Great Mouse Detective is not a bad film, but not great one. What's good about it? Ratigan, GREAT villain (Hell it's Vincent Price!). Basil, good hero. Some songs are nice. The animation is pretty good, the best parts are the clock fight sequence and some of the toy shop stuff. And that is basically all the great stuff. What's wrong with it? Nothing really? It is just that the side characters, while not bad, they are boring except for fidget. Some parts of the story is rather slow moving. I love Henry Mancini, but he needs to make up his mind on weather this was to be a musical or not. It's like there are some moments where the characters break into song and then no more songs. The rest of the animation is just ok, and that's it. Like I said above, the clock tower and toy shop scenes really stand out. You want a good mouse film? The Rescuers. Now that one SHOULD be an important Disney classic (it was the ONLY disney hit after The Jungle Book and before The Little Mermaid). Plus it received a sequel, and good one for that matter. Great Mouse may not be a flop per say, it was a modest success at the box office, it was no Rescuers hit. Great Mouse just helped move the studio forward.

Not really gonna get into the Disney sequels stuff because they were mostly direct-to-video. Though I do agree that Cinderella III was good.

Bolt and Meet the Robinsons while were better than Chicken Little, they are just ok. Like The Great Mouse Detective, they helped move the studio forward ONLY. Tangled and Wreck It Ralph are far more superior films than these two. But I will give credit to both Meet the Robinsons and Bolt for helping Disney get back on track. You can see that Disney was trying. Both films have moments that were good and you can tell that something was coming. Tangled and Wreck It Ralph was thats something and everything came in full circle. Hopefully Frozen continues this trend.

You want Disney Films that need more love? Well, I already mentioned The Rescuers, but I would have to say Mulan, Tarzan, The Emperor's New Groove and The Princess and the Frog. While Mulan did way better than Pocahontas, Hunchback and Hercules, and Disney does give this film attention, not enough. It is featured in products, parks, film montages etc. but not enough. Tarzan, same deal. The Princess and the Frog brought back Disney 2-D Animation. It was a nice welcome-back. Got 3 Oscar nominations, and received great reviews. All 3 of these films NEED a attraction at Disney parks. Now, I know Tarzan has one in Disneyland, but not in Disney WORLD. The Emperor's New Groove is probably the most underrated out of the all of them. Mulan, Tarzan and The Princess and the Frog may not be featured as much as Snow White or Lion King, they do still get some level of attention. New Groove doesn't really get attention at all and yet it has a huge following. It made money on VHS and DVD, got a sequel and TV series.

So, that's my opinion about this, what's yours?
I agree. They should of been more respected to those movies, but no, they're being stupid. :x
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

I disagree with this. Those films do not NEED an attraction in the parks before many other better films get attractions in the parks, like a lot of Walt's classics.
What other films need rides? Beside the Pixar films or Nightmare Before Christmas plus Tangled and Wreck It Ralph, I cannot think of any other animated film that could get a ride.

Films like:

The Sword in the Stone
The Aristocats
Robin Hood
The Rescuers (VERY sad that I had to put this film on the list because it SOOO needs love and is an important film but Disney doesn't see that)
The Fox and the Hound
The Black Cauldron
The Great Mouse Detective
Oliver and Company
Pocahontas
The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Hercules
The Emperor's New Groove (Same here, VERY sad)
Atlantis: The Lost Empire
Treasure Planet
Brother Bear
Valiant
Chicken Little
The Wild
Meet the Robinsons
Bolt
A Christmas Carol
Gnomeo and Juliet
Mars Needs Moms

are not popular enough or strong enough to receive a ride or attraction. Out of all these movies, The Rescuers and The Emperor's New Groove are the only films that to me Disney should try to give them more attention and maybe build a ride themed after them.
You know, I think you only made this thread because you consider that TV tropes page to have some importance when it really doesn't. Everything's only as important as you make it.
No, it is not about importance. It is about having a nice discussion about why some of the films people go back and forth on which films need more attention or not.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

Easy, Pinocchio needs presence in Disney World, Bambi, Fantasia, Lady and the Tramp, Sleeping Beauty needs presence in Disney World, 101 Dalmatians, The Jungle Book, and Aladdin, all before the movies you think need a presence.
Image
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Post by thelittleursula »

toplaycool22 wrote:Also thelittleursula, can you be more specific about why you disagree?
I'm not usually a debate sort of person. I'm more of a "this is my opinion " and if you disagree then that's fine, you are free to have yours.

But since you asked nicely. :)

I disagree about Hercules being a bland hero, because he's easy to relate to. He's unsure about who he is and his identity, but because he was bullied and teased as a kid, he believes that if he becomes popular and famous, he'll be able to find out who he is and he'll be loved and liked by everybody.

Who doesn't want to feel like they belong ? Who hasn't gone through the " who am I " ? stage ?

In the end Hercules realizes that just being kind and just being who he is is, is enough to be a hero and be loved and because of that he works out who he is as a person.


HOND is on my top five Disney movies, because of how beautifully animated it is, how wonderful the soundtrack is ( Out there, Hellfire and more ) the characters like Clopin, Quasi and Esmeralda. The sweet but also tragic storyline and the one of the best endings in a Disney movie, ever made.
Disney Duster wrote: And from what I remember of Hunchback, Hercules, and The Great Mouse Detective, those are better than Mulan and Tarzan. At least I like them better.
I agree with this.
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Post by disneyboy20022 »

thelittleursula wrote:He's unsure about who he is and his identity, but because he was bullied and teased as a kid, he believes that if he becomes popular and famous, he'll be able to find out who he is and he'll be loved and liked by everybody.

Who doesn't want to feel like they belong ? Who hasn't gone through the " who am I " ? stage ?
He was also had the powers of a God and was raised by mortals who lived on a farm....wait a minute.....

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YSN6et9eze8" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

I disagree about Hercules being a bland hero, because he's easy to relate to. He's unsure about who he is and his identity, but because he was bullied and teased as a kid, he believes that if he becomes popular and famous, he'll be able to find out who he is and he'll be loved and liked by everybody.

Who doesn't want to feel like they belong ? Who hasn't gone through the " who am I " ? stage ?

In the end Hercules realizes that just being kind and just being who he is is, is enough to be a hero and be loved and because of that he works out who he is as a person.
Good point there and I see where you are going with your observation. And it is a good one. When I saw Hercules, I can see that in the storyline but I felt that the creators of Hercules didn't pay too much attention on Hercules figuring out his identity. I felt that they would touch on that a little bit then go straight to myth parodies. If they focused a lot on what you said I feel that Hercules would of been great. That would of been great character development. Same with the romance with Hercules and Meg, their development felt rushed in my opinion. Unlike Aladdin and Jasmine that got enough time to get to know each other, I felt that Hercules and Meg's scenes were rushed. They were trying to go for the Aladdin and Jasmine approach a little bit only adding the misunderstanding of Meg working for Hades.
HOND is on my top five Disney movies, because of how beautifully animated it is, how wonderful the soundtrack is ( Out there, Hellfire and more ) the characters like Clopin, Quasi and Esmeralda. The sweet but also tragic storyline and the one of the best endings in a Disney movie, ever made.
I agree that the animation is spectacular. Just look how they did Notre Dame. The structure of it and the animation surrounding it was just gorgeous. The soundtrack was very good I agree with that. I just feel for Disney standards, not as memorable. For films in general yes. If this was live-action or even still animated but under a different studio company and it had these songs, it will still be great. I just can't compare Out There with Part of Your World or Belle or the other Disney songs. People feel that Tangled took a lot from this movie and Tangled somehow did better and wonder why this film did not make more money. Well, there is a reason. Tangled is based on a fairy tale, not to say fairy tales don't have adult themes, but not on the same level of Hunchback. Hunchback is kinda like Rapunzel meets Beauty and the Beast story but with themes of religion, sex and other things added to it. Victor Hugo stories deal with very strong adult themes unlike fairy tales that deal with adult themes in a fantastical way. Now, Hunchback is disneyfied yes, kind of like The Jungle Book. Now, I don't know if The Jungle Book the story deals with the content that The Hunchback of Notre Dame deals with, but I'm guessing not since no one has ever mentioned oh I don't know Mowgli lusting or characters dealing with religious stuff (or for the fact the Mowgli is in India Hinduism). But that's the point, the story does not have a history of being more adult while Hunchback does. Is that a bad thing? No. Adult stories are great, but we have to remember who we are marketing to. And Disney and Victor Hugo don't mesh together in my opinion.
And from what I remember of Hunchback, Hercules, and The Great Mouse Detective, those are better than Mulan and Tarzan. At least I like them better.
Can you also be more specific on why those films are better than the ones I think are better in your opinion?
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

disneyboy20022 wrote:
thelittleursula wrote:He's unsure about who he is and his identity, but because he was bullied and teased as a kid, he believes that if he becomes popular and famous, he'll be able to find out who he is and he'll be loved and liked by everybody.

Who doesn't want to feel like they belong ? Who hasn't gone through the " who am I " ? stage ?
He was also had the powers of a God and was raised by mortals who lived on a farm....wait a minute.....

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YSN6et9eze8" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Smallville sucks, Use a better Superman analogy.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

Smallville sucks, Use a better Superman analogy.
I would have to agree on that one. While I have a soft spot for smallville, it is not a good analogy for superman.
User avatar
Dr Frankenollie
In The Vaults
Posts: 2704
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am

Post by Dr Frankenollie »

@TsWade2: Did you really need to quote that entire post?
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

I was gonna ask that myself.
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Post by disneyboy20022 »

Super Aurora wrote:
disneyboy20022 wrote: He was also had the powers of a God and was raised by mortals who lived on a farm....wait a minute.....

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YSN6et9eze8" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Smallville sucks, Use a better Superman analogy.
Is this better?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cc1XPPA1fbc" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

Like that montage :)
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

toplaycool22 wrote:
And from what I remember of Hunchback, Hercules, and The Great Mouse Detective, those are better than Mulan and Tarzan. At least I like them better.
Can you also be more specific on why those films are better than the ones I think are better in your opinion?
No I can't because it's been very long since I've seen any of those films. But I can say Hercules was fun and had a great ending, Hunchback was amazing with great music and animation and story, and Victor Hugo and Disney did actually manage to mesh. If you would like to see them mesh better look at Der Glöckner von Notre Dame the stage musical of the film.
Image
toplaycool22

Post by toplaycool22 »

If you would like to see them mesh better look at Der Glöckner von Notre Dame the stage musical of the film.
I heard about that. I knew someone that saw that version. They weren't a fan of the disney film but they liked the stage version better.
Post Reply