Disney Sued Over Winnie the Pooh

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21086
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

Disney Wins U.S. Appeals Court Ruling Over Pooh Trademark
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-1 ... -trademark
Walt Disney Co., the world’s largest entertainment company, won an appeals court ruling that protects its trademark rights to the Winnie-the-Pooh characters.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office was correct to throw out challenges to the trademark ownership filed by Stephen Slesinger Inc., which has waged a decades-long battle with Disney over ownership of the Pooh characters, an appeals court in Washington said today. Slesinger had already litigated the issue and lost in district court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said in an opinion posted on its website.

A.A. Milne, who wrote the Pooh books, transferred merchandising rights to Stephen Slesinger in 1930, and his widow licensed the rights to Disney in 1961. The Slesinger company and Disney have been fighting in court over royalties since at least 1991.

In 2009, a federal court ruled that Slesinger had transferred all of its rights in the Pooh works to Burbank, California-based Disney. The Federal Circuit today said that, based on that 2009 ruling, the trademark office was right to bar Slesinger from seeking to cancel the Disney trademarks.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

This thread is ancient.

As is this court battle. They should just give up already.
User avatar
Neal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:40 am

Post by Neal »

I wonder how many times someone has sued Disney and actually won? Probably pretty rare.
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21086
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

Neal wrote:I wonder how many times someone has sued Disney and actually won? Probably pretty rare.
Well, Disney recently lost the big Who Wants to Be a Millionaire lawsuit.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Neal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1550
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:40 am

Post by Neal »

^^ Ohh Diz, you really need that extra $300 mil... John Carter really has made you greedy to regain funds, huh? :roll:
User avatar
Semaj
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:22 am
Location: Buffalo
Contact:

Post by Semaj »

They probably deserved that loss.

Who Wants to be a Millionare? tanked, because ABC tried to show it four times a week in early 2001, which was part of why they had a hard time finding new shows over the next few years.
Image
"OH COME ON, REALLY?!?!"
User avatar
Kraken Guard
Special Edition
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:47 pm
Location: The Flying Dutchman

Post by Kraken Guard »

Funny.

When I saw the topic title, I thought someone had gotten pooh stains on their suit. :P
Image
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21086
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

It looks like it's finally over.

Once and for all, the Pooh belongs to Disney
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail. ... c58b08a7d6
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

Sotiris wrote:It looks like it's finally over.

Once and for all, the Pooh belongs to Disney
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail. ... c58b08a7d6
Finally. :lol:
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Post by disneyboy20022 »

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zkvsiGFHy2k" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Substitute Pooh for Rock :P
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
Post Reply