Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 3-D Coming to Theaters?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Post Reply
danielshooley
Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Statesboro, Georgia

Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 3-D Coming to Theaters?

Post by danielshooley »

Hi everyone,

As we both know, Who Framed Roger Rabbit will be making its Blu-Ray debut in time for the films 25th anniversary in 2013.

Wikipedia is reporting, additionally, that Disney announced after the 3-d Re-Release of The Lion King that Who Framed Roger Rabbit will be re-released in 3-D on November 22, 2013.

Knowing its reputation for false information, I HOPE its true, but I DOUBT it; any confirmation about this will be great in advance.

If the 3-d Re-Release of Roger Rabbit IS true, Count Me IN on Day ONE!!!

Danny
User avatar
estefan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3195
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:27 pm

Post by estefan »

Disney hasn't announced it and it's on Wikipedia, so I'm betting some wishful fan has edited the page.
"There are two wolves and they are always fighting. One is darkness and despair. The other is light and hope. Which wolf wins? Whichever one you feed." - Casey Newton, Tomorrowland
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

*Sigh

I hate to sound like a jerk, but when are people going to learn that Wikipedia is NEVER a good source of information?

If a 3D re-release is coming, Disney will announce it. Plain and simple.
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Post by thelittleursula »

Yeah what the guys above have said. It's most likely been edited by a fan since anybody can manipulate that page.

It would be cool to see it in the Cinemas though.
pap64 wrote:
I hate to sound like a jerk.
You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

thelittleursula wrote:You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
Because wishing ill will towards a movie that was produced by talented, hard working people that are already under enough stress from both the expectations of the company and the fanboys that complain about their work isn't one of the dumbest things one will ever say. I get that you are somehow upset that Disney may be moving away, but spewing biased hatred towards any of their products will not make the problem go away. You don't have to like the movie if you don't care for it, but to condemn it is just beyond ridiculous.

And based on the other comments you have gotten from other people, I am certainly not the only one with the same mentality.

As for my post on this thread, I do apologize to the creator of this thread, since people do forget or do not know that Wikipedia pages can be changed to provide false information. So to daniel, I apologize.
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

pap64 wrote:*Sigh

I hate to sound like a jerk, but when are people going to learn that Wikipedia is NEVER a good source of information?

If a 3D re-release is coming, Disney will announce it. Plain and simple.

Wikipedia at least has started cracking down on misinformation by requiring sources.

And I have to vouche for you not being a jerk.
Image
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

thelittleursula wrote:You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
One of the few rules we have here is no personal attacks against fellow forum members. Not only is this unnecessary, it's not even in the right thread.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Image
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Post by disneyboy20022 »

Disney Duster wrote:In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Two wrongs does not make it right.
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

I'm well aware of what I said in the thread, and I apologize for that too
ImageImageImageImage

Image
Mickeyfan1990
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2561
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 12:24 pm

Post by Mickeyfan1990 »

Found a link regarding on the 3-D release:

http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/who-f ... bob/288960

You find that reliable? :?
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Post by thelittleursula »

pap64 wrote:I'm well aware of what I said in the thread, and I apologize for that too
Okay I'm sorry as well....
Disney Duster wrote:In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Well to be honest I did find it to be really offensive. I mean how would you feel if somebody you said was the dumbest thing you have ever read ? I feel like it was a huge personal attack.

But we've both said sorry now. So yeah.
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21073
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

Q: Would you consider doing 3-D post-conversion on any of your earlier films?

Robert Zemeckis: The only one is "Roger Rabbit," because you could really pull the animation out as a separate element. It would be very spectacular 3-D. As far as converting, the "Back to the Future" films... I don't see the point in that. But they did a test on "Roger" back in 2006, somewhere around then, and it looks really great.
Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/169815 ... quel.jhtml
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
Post Reply