Random Disney Photoshop Fun

WarriorDreamer · Post by **WarriorDreamer** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:46 am

Yeah I wish everyone could just get on. I didn't think there'd be any arguments at-all on a Disney forum, since I thought everyone would respect each others opinion.

Super Aurora · Post by **Super Aurora** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:37 am

Disney Geek wrote: I'm glad to see this drama being resolved

Oh you just wait, my friend. It's coming back.

WarriorDreamer wrote: I didn't think there'd be any arguments at-all on a Disney forum, since I thought everyone would respect each others opinion.

You have a lot to learn, my friend.

Disney Duster · Post by **Disney Duster** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:51 pm

Well enigmawing I agree with a lot of what you said, but, as for the very last thing...sorry but, unless we come to an agreement I'm going to have to say that is just your opinion. If someone gets hurt, even if I wasn't crying but was still hurt, I'm going to ask someone if they would please...oh wait, did you even know what I was trying to do? I first explained (VERY politely by the way, perfectly acceptably) why I was hurt and how Disney and Pixar were two seperate things and why I thought their comment was wrong as in maybe they would change their mind or take it back. If they didn't, I would have left it alone.

Meanwhile, what you and many others did was just assume that I was demanding the person take it back and make them do it even if they refused or something like that. And it was really between me and the other person. You could have said "they don't have to take it back" and then I would have said "I agree, I'm going to see if they might want to after what I said to them", but no, you didn't do that, you just attacked. And you say I'd be causing more problems? No, if someone apologized, that would end the problem, they're the real ones who have the ability to cause more problems. If they refused, THEN I might let it go even though they're wrong, and then that would also end the problem.

And for the record, I don't want to cause a problem with you, but I will not let people slander me either. I don't even have a real problem with you, I am just standing up for myself.

WarriorDreamer · Post by **WarriorDreamer** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:18 pm

Super Aurora wrote: You have a lot to learn, my friend.

Well, I knew like any forum there'd be disputes because, y'know, different opinions and everything...

But I thought this would be a slightly calmer, more respectful forum. Some other places on the internet are just nasty. There are arguments all the time.

It's not that hard to not get angry or rude just because someone says something you don't agree with. Considering what the subject matter is.

Goliath · Post by **Goliath** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:33 pm

Disney Duster wrote:No. And no I was saying that because the young kids that usually hear curse words are the ones hearing them in the same families that let them play with guns,

To quote Super A.:

LOL wat?!

Elladorine · Post by **Elladorine** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:21 pm

Disney Duster wrote:Well enigmawing I agree with a lot of what you said, but, as for the very last thing...sorry but, unless we come to an agreement I'm going to have to say that is just your opinion.

Well yes, it's just my opinion that it's silly to get so personally hurt over such impersonal comments, but I'm not about to back down from that. People all over the place have real problems, and you're getting upset over people having differing opinions on an entertainment company than you, opinions that weren't even made in a negative light! Nothing personal here but I'm sorry, I simply fail to grasp why you apparently get so hurt every time someone praises anything you don't consider to contain proper Disney essence.

Disney Duster wrote:Meanwhile, what you and many others did was just assume that I was demanding the person take it back and make them do it even if they refused or something like that.

Who is making the assumptions here? Where did I ever say you made "demands" over the issues we're currently discussing?

Disney Duster wrote:And for the record, I don't want to cause a problem with you, but I will not let people slander me either. I don't even have a real problem with you, I am just standing up for myself.

And as for defamation of character, that would be libel, not slander . . . which I don't feel I'm doing. Once again, nothing personal, but I'm having problems grasping how I could have possibly "slandered" you in my post when I was simply giving my own opinion.

Rose Dome · Post by **Rose Dome** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:51 pm

Super Aurora wrote:
Disney Geek wrote: I'm glad to see this drama being resolved
Oh you just wait, my friend. It's coming back.

I guess I spoke too soon. It seems nothing can stop a Disney Duster Derail.

Disney Duster · Post by **Disney Duster** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:12 pm

Enigmawing, there is another definition of slander that is not from law and doesn't specify a difference between spoken or written words. Also, please don't exaggerate/lie, I was not hurt because someone praised something that didn't have Disney essence, I was hurt when someone said that something else had the Disney feel when only Disney can and should have the Disney feel. They didn't say it was "like" a Disney feel. They didn't say it felt to them like it felt like Disney. Please let's not get more into it, because it didn't matter, I didn't demand them to take it back, I just asked, and they never responded so I let it go.

Disney Geek wrote:I guess I spoke too soon. It seems nothing can stop a Disney Duster Derail.

Nothing can stop that Disney Duster should stand up for himself? Got it

Semaj · Post by **Semaj** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:16 pm

Can we just ban Disney Duster for a while? Even after someone threw him a bone, all he ever does is disrupt threads.

Elladorine · Post by **Elladorine** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:53 pm

Disney Duster wrote:Also, please don't exaggerate/lie, I was not hurt because someone praised something that didn't have Disney essence, I was hurt when someone said that something else had the Disney feel when only Disney can and should have the Disney feel. They didn't say it was "like" a Disney feel. They didn't say it felt to them like it felt like Disney.

Sorry, but due to the vague and ever-evolving definitions you've given I didn't realize that there was any real difference between a "Disney feel" and the "Disney essence," or that I was somehow lying/exaggerating when I explained my opinion on why I thought you were getting upset over something silly. Regardless I still don't understand why you feel the need to take any of these statements about Disney or Pixar personally. I understand you're very attached to certain concepts but other people's opinions on them is in no way a reflection on you.

And once again, where on earth did I ever say you made "demands?" You tell me I'm making assumptions but you're the one doing it, and on top of that you're telling me I'm somehow not only being slanderous, but a liar?

Regardless, I hate to see a fun thread like this ruined along with a few others that already have been, which is why I initially stepped in to participate with the language/rules discussion in an attempt to settle things. But this discussion is invading too many threads and I don't have the authority to say enough is enough. As usual, the conversation ends up running around in circles so I'm stepping away from it.

sunhuntin · Post by **sunhuntin** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:40 am

Semaj wrote:Can we just ban Disney Duster for a while? Even after someone threw him a bone, all he ever does is disrupt threads.

one forum im on has a sin bin and members get "sent" there when repeated warnings to cool it go unheeded. basically, they can see and read the site, but the colors are in tones of pink [its a biker site] and they cant reply to threads for however long the mods decide. it gives time for arguments like this to settle and generally vanish down the pages.

i am getting sick of the same disagreement being posted in the majority of threads, mainly cos it takes a fun thread like this one and runs it off course.

Disney Duster · Post by **Disney Duster** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:32 am

Yea? Well maybe people shouldn't mention something from another thread about asking someone to do something in another thread. Because that's what happened.

Look enigmawing, there's really no problem here accept one last thing, and that is when I say those comments hurt me personally, I don't mean they are saying something wrong about me, but something wrong about something I love, that I feel hurt. If someone said a friend of yours was something they were not, you would be personally hurt.

Mooky · Post by **Mooky** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 1:06 pm

More Disney/Facebook stuff...

Elladorine · Post by **Elladorine** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:57 pm

Mooky wrote:More Disney/Facebook stuff...

Those are awesome!

Neal · Post by **Neal** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:05 pm

Arr I'm an idiot, I kept thinking "what's funny about this? They spelt Pocahontas wrong!" It took a few re-reads to get it. Probably because I read slowly so I was reading it as Poke ... ... ... Ahontas. Not PokeAhontas.

Rose Dome · Post by **Rose Dome** » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:50 pm

I think these are pretty cool (sorry about the ad's. I can't embed these because of how they're formated)

http://joyhog.com/2009/09/13/marveldisn ... p-mashups/

Super Aurora · Post by **Super Aurora** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:17 am

Mooky wrote:More Disney/Facebook stuff...

Neal · Post by **Neal** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:19 am

I'm dying! Who ever greenlighted such a creepy Woody doll? Or was it modified. Makes me think of:

Super Aurora · Post by **Super Aurora** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:41 am

Neal wrote:

I'm dying! Who ever greenlighted such a creepy Woody doll? Or was it modified.

That's an actual toy. From a toy company made in.......

Wait for it.....

JAPAN.

Basically it was done by Rolvotech who mostly do figurines from anime and usually mecha ones(evangelion for example). They also make toys from other stuff and Toy Story happen to be one of they ones they decided to make. So when they made the prototype woody verison, it look like THAT(and some people were able to buy it.). What's even funnier is that you can move the eyes around the way you want them to be.
So yes it is an actual toy. but the final product is normal looking(though you can still moves it's eyes. Just no creepy grin).

Why is there no outcry yet? Well one, It's made in Japan and distributed only in Japan(the land that has all the good shit), and also the toy company that makes it is a company usually geared to young adults and geeks who are toy collectors. They aren't a kids marketed toy company. Pixar has yet to comment about that Woody.

Neal · Post by **Neal** » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:46 am

Oh Japan, my number 1 place that I desire to visit.

Their sense of humor is so on point, as is this Woody doll.

and Barbie loves him!

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

Random Disney Photoshop Fun