check out this great pic of Puss in Boots!! (played of course by Antonio Banderas!)

aparrantly he's supposed to be hystericaly funny in this role!! if ya want summor info check it out here:
http://www.animated-news.com/archives/00000080.html

and along with Garfield!!Uncle Remus wrote:yeah i think Shrek 2 is going to be one of the good movies in summer 2004 along Harry Potter 3.
Thank you!!2099net wrote:
Never mind that Puss-In-Boots is supposed to be French, not Spanish. But they couldn't use French could they, because their Robin Hood in the original Shrek had a "Camp French Accent" which was, alledgedly "hysterically funny to listern to". Never mind that Robin Hood is, of course, English.
This is an old thread. Before there was a Movies, Music, and TV section.milojthatch wrote:Why is this thread in the "Off Topic" section? Anyway, I'm willing to give this one a try. I hated "Shrek," but loved the Puss character, so I have some hopes for this one.
Yes, I understand that, but it could have been moved by now.UmbrellaFish wrote:This is an old thread. Before there was a Movies, Music, and TV section.milojthatch wrote:Why is this thread in the "Off Topic" section? Anyway, I'm willing to give this one a try. I hated "Shrek," but loved the Puss character, so I have some hopes for this one.
Anyways, I liked the trailer. I won't see the movie in theatres, but I'm sure I'll end up buying it.
"It is not a send-up of fairy tales," says Miller, who wrote and co-directed "Shrek the Third." "Our approach was, you thought you knew how all of those fairy stories went, but they went this way. Then from there, let's make sure the characters are driving the comedy and story, steer away from the popular culture references and make it a real character piece."
But even with those guidelines, the "Puss" team got a little stumped in shaping the movie — until Guillermo del Toro ("Pan's Labyrinth," "Hellboy") joined the team as an executive producer. "Guillermo was a gift to us," Miller says. "The film had been coming together in this great way, but we had hit that point where in a weird way we had taken it as far as we could. We needed someone to liberate us creatively and sort of shake the tree. He expanded the way we saw the film at the perfect time in the process. He's been just a gift for us."
Wow, DreamWorks, now my mixed reaction is going to borderline bad. I mean, not everything in that promo was funny. A couple, yes, but not funny. I mean, sure Shrek 2 was entertaining and funny, but this was just weak.Sotiris wrote:<iframe width="560" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JfcDHf2bQY8" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Yep, pretty much. And I didn't think the "Legendary" one was so bad, it's just a parody of the Dos Equis campaign which isn't supposed to be laugh-out-loud funny anyway.Sotiris wrote:It's just a viral promo video, people. It would be more accurate to judge the film from a proper trailer than from this. Don't you remember that even Tangled had some pretty crappy viral videos? You can't really tell the quality of the finished film from those.