That is crazy. The 90's Disney Animation Renaissance, or second (or third depending on your perspective) Golden Age ended with "Tarzan," NOT "Pocahontas." From "The Little Mermaid," to "Tarzan," while some where more popular then others and maybe did better at the box office, each of those films could run circles around anything else from that era, and a number of films at Disney before and after.
I understand that many people (like my 11th grade History teacher) hated "Pocahontas" for a number of reasons, maybe the biggest being that it was very far from being historically accurate. What I tell people who feel that way is that this film wasn't trying to be historically accurate, it was trying to focus more on putting the usual Disney twist on the legend and myth of Pocahontas, not the real woman. There is a difference. And maybe, it might even get kids interested in the real person. That happened to me when it came out.
jpanimation wrote:To be fair,
Pocahontas does indeed suck
In my opinion, of course. I liked it as a kid but upon recent re-watching, it's amateur hour all over. I think it deserves it's reputation, not just because it doesn't stack up against other Renaissance films but because it's just a mess either way you look at it.
The lowest point of Disney Animation in the 90's was "Hunchback." Yes, I realize on this board, for reasons I'll never be able to understand, it seems all the "Hunchback" fans have clustered over here and love it. But seriously, compared to the other films of this ear, including "Pocahontas," it was the weak link.
"Pocahontas" was a film that suffered 1.) for being the film after "The Lion King," and 2.) for being a film based on a real person that was more inspired by the mythical elements of that real person instead of the real person herself.