Tangled Discussion Part VI: Let the Drama continue...

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Locked
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

I bought this earlier today just because I got my paycheck and Shopko's on the way home from work. I bought it on a whim so no coupon so the 2-disc Combo was still about $27
Image
mokka456
Limited Issue
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:45 am

Post by mokka456 »

And here's the last deleted scene (Vigor the Visionary):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQC_70WH50
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21070
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

mokka456 wrote:And here's the last deleted scene (Vigor the Visionary):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQC_70WH50

Thanks!! :D
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
mokka456
Limited Issue
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:45 am

Post by mokka456 »

Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

mokka456 wrote:Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250
I love Bon Iver, beautiful music and very fitting for WDAS in its current state. bittersweet.
User avatar
Semaj
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:22 am
Location: Buffalo
Contact:

Post by Semaj »

mokka456 wrote:And here's the Chemistry Develops one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJVke1ethJw
It's official: Rapunzel is my new favorite princess.

Even in rough sketches, they make her so huggable. :float:
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

BK wrote:Not going to waste my time looking into pages of nonsensical DD talk and while humourous, neither do I want to read people bashing that nonsense because it's so futile.
Why is it nonsense? I'm discussing how the film could be more like past Disney films, and be more Disney. And I give reasons.

Meanwhile most other people are saying how cute Rapunzel is. Yea, she is.

Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
Image
User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by SpringHeelJack »

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
Oh, God.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
User avatar
Dream Huntress
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: Somewhere

Post by Dream Huntress »

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
And then they changed it, why? Because they realized it wasn't working. So you see, they chose to do what was better for the movie, so they could tell the story in a manner that could interest and entertain the audience. Because if you can't get people interested in the movie, then what was the point of making it in the first place?

Honestly, does the storybook opening even works anymore? The last couple of times I've seen it, in Shrek and Enchanted, it was pretty much used as a parody.
Image
User avatar
Kyle
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3550
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Kyle »

Disney Duster wrote:Why is it nonsense?
Because Disney is gone. no one else is disney, no one should be trying to emulate someone to the degree that you push it. If you set out to make a film that is "Disney" or "Pixar", "Dreamworks" whatever your doomed from the start because your putting a movie into a box that it needs not to be in. every director does things differently and should be allowed to do things that they feel is for the best. creative minds, if allowed will redefine what it means in the first place to be "Disney". the more you try to pretend to know what Walt might have done the more inbread and bland everything becomes.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

^Yet another solid piece of common sense that Duster will either totally ignore or twist into something else or twist his own argument to either accodomate or fight the new development.

The way I see it, Tangled had every ingredient of a solid Disney movie. Too many of them in fact. The same formula grows a tad stale after awhile no matter how you dress it.
Image
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
Image
DisneyAnimation88
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1088
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:00 am

Post by DisneyAnimation88 »

DisneyDuster wrote:This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do
:brick:

Can I ask, who exactly said that they felt it was a Disney thing to do?
We're not going to Guam, are we?
mokka456
Limited Issue
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:45 am

Post by mokka456 »

Here's a catalogue site (i think) with Tangled things:

http://online-fremdfigurenkatalog.de/se ... 7bc&page=1
User avatar
Sky Syndrome
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Maine

Post by Sky Syndrome »

Disney Duster, you're talking about Disney making movies today that would reflect the 50's as though they were made in that decade. Disney doesn't have the mindset for making the movies like those from the 50's because most of the people that worked on the films then are dead, retired, etc. Also take into consideration that movie audiences of today are interested in differents things from the audiences of the 50's.
Image
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

Disney Duster wrote:
Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

When I was watching that deleted scene, the first thing I said to my self is :

"Duster is going to bring this up on UD and use it to say they had right idea of disney ness blah blah blah but noooooo blah blah blah..... "


i'm psychic.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

PatrickvD wrote:Image
*snort*

*wipes beer off his computer screen*

rotfl
User avatar
Semaj
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:22 am
Location: Buffalo
Contact:

Post by Semaj »

This has become one of my favorite Rapunzel pics from dA.

Image
Image
"OH COME ON, REALLY?!?!"
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
phan258
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:28 pm

Post by phan258 »

Super Aurora wrote:my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately


:lol: :lol: :lol:

There's so much great fanart for this movie...makes me so happy.
<a href="http://s1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... t=sig2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... 8/sig2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
Locked