Tangled Discussion Part VI: Let the Drama continue...
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
- Sotiris
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 21070
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Fantasyland
mokka456 wrote:And here's the last deleted scene (Vigor the Visionary):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQC_70WH50
Thanks!!

Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250
-
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
I love Bon Iver, beautiful music and very fitting for WDAS in its current state. bittersweet.mokka456 wrote:Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250
- Disney Duster
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 14017
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: America
Why is it nonsense? I'm discussing how the film could be more like past Disney films, and be more Disney. And I give reasons.BK wrote:Not going to waste my time looking into pages of nonsensical DD talk and while humourous, neither do I want to read people bashing that nonsense because it's so futile.
Meanwhile most other people are saying how cute Rapunzel is. Yea, she is.
Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

- SpringHeelJack
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
Oh, God.Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
- Dream Huntress
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere
And then they changed it, why? Because they realized it wasn't working. So you see, they chose to do what was better for the movie, so they could tell the story in a manner that could interest and entertain the audience. Because if you can't get people interested in the movie, then what was the point of making it in the first place?Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
Honestly, does the storybook opening even works anymore? The last couple of times I've seen it, in Shrek and Enchanted, it was pretty much used as a parody.
Because Disney is gone. no one else is disney, no one should be trying to emulate someone to the degree that you push it. If you set out to make a film that is "Disney" or "Pixar", "Dreamworks" whatever your doomed from the start because your putting a movie into a box that it needs not to be in. every director does things differently and should be allowed to do things that they feel is for the best. creative minds, if allowed will redefine what it means in the first place to be "Disney". the more you try to pretend to know what Walt might have done the more inbread and bland everything becomes.Disney Duster wrote:Why is it nonsense?
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
^Yet another solid piece of common sense that Duster will either totally ignore or twist into something else or twist his own argument to either accodomate or fight the new development.
The way I see it, Tangled had every ingredient of a solid Disney movie. Too many of them in fact. The same formula grows a tad stale after awhile no matter how you dress it.
The way I see it, Tangled had every ingredient of a solid Disney movie. Too many of them in fact. The same formula grows a tad stale after awhile no matter how you dress it.

-
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

-
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:00 am
DisneyDuster wrote:This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do

Can I ask, who exactly said that they felt it was a Disney thing to do?
We're not going to Guam, are we?
Here's a catalogue site (i think) with Tangled things:
http://online-fremdfigurenkatalog.de/se ... 7bc&page=1
http://online-fremdfigurenkatalog.de/se ... 7bc&page=1
- Sky Syndrome
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Maine
Disney Duster, you're talking about Disney making movies today that would reflect the 50's as though they were made in that decade. Disney doesn't have the mindset for making the movies like those from the 50's because most of the people that worked on the films then are dead, retired, etc. Also take into consideration that movie audiences of today are interested in differents things from the audiences of the 50's.

- Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
Disney Duster wrote:
Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!
When I was watching that deleted scene, the first thing I said to my self is :
"Duster is going to bring this up on UD and use it to say they had right idea of disney ness blah blah blah but noooooo blah blah blah..... "
i'm psychic.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
- Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
Super Aurora wrote:my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately



There's so much great fanart for this movie...makes me so happy.
<a href="http://s1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... t=sig2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... 8/sig2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>