Would you like Disney to make more mature animated films?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
DisneyFan09
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4023
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:28 pm

Would you like Disney to make more mature animated films?

Post by DisneyFan09 »

As known, Disney is first and foremost known as a family friendly company, which has made mostly family friendly animated features. However, they’ve still included some serious themes into their movies. For example a child watching his father get murdered (“The Lion King”), a heroine which has to sacrifice to be with her sweetheart for the good of her own people (“Pocahontas”). And not to mention the themes in “Hunchback”, which is with no doubt Disney’s most daring film to date and which conveyed themes that you usually don’t expect to see in an animated feature. So my question is; Would you like to see Disney expanding themselves and including more serious, mature themes in their animated features? And if so, which themes?

Although I love Disney films for what they are, I wouldn’t mind to see Disney expanding them selves. As long as it is for the good, though
User avatar
singerguy04
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: The Land of Lincoln

Post by singerguy04 »

I think timing is everything. When The Lion King and Pocahontas were beginning development, Beauty and the Beast had just been nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars and won at the Golden Globes. In fact, Pocahontas was being created with winning the Oscar in mind.

With Up and Toy Story 3, I think the time for a more serious animated film like the ones you've mentioned is finally starting to come around again. The only problem is that Disney itself doesn't seem confident in itself to attempt it. Maybe if Reboot Ralph does as well as Tangled we'll see Mort take a very serious tone.
User avatar
Semaj
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:22 am
Location: Buffalo
Contact:

Post by Semaj »

I thought that was what Touchstone was for. Back when they did it with Roger Rabbit and Nightmare Before Christmas.

It would definitely be worth a try if placed in the right hands.
User avatar
Spottedfeather
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 3:50 am

Post by Spottedfeather »

I'd really like to see much darker versions of Black Hole and The Black Cauldron.
Think about this. Once bread becomes toast, you can't make it back into bread.
User avatar
Cheshire_Cat
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:59 am
Location: Texas

Post by Cheshire_Cat »

I'd like to see Disney incorporate darker themes into its movies as well. I think it would help them appeal to all age groups and rid itself of the "Disney is for kids" mentality that seems to be omnipresent in society.
DARTH KNITE
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Torrance , Ca USA

Post by DARTH KNITE »

The darker films Beauty to Hunchback, were what I consider Disney's goldens age. Hercules was the most insulting thing I've ever seen to follow up something so groundbreaking as Hunchback. I'd love to see them go back to this style.
DisneyFan09
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4023
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:28 pm

Post by DisneyFan09 »

The darker films Beauty to Hunchback, were what I consider Disney's goldens age. Hercules was the most insulting thing I've ever seen to follow up something so groundbreaking as Hunchback. I'd love to see them go back to this style.
That's exactly what I felt when I saw "Hercules" back in 1997. Although I learned to like it over the years.

"Aladdin" wasn't a dark picture either (although it was a fun one, for sure).
User avatar
littlefuzzy
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1700
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:36 pm

Post by littlefuzzy »

It would have to come from another "imprint" like Touchstone. If Disney (or Pixar) released a dark mature pg-13 animated film, there would be vast hordes of parents that took their 5-6 year olds to the latest Disney flick, and then they'd be mad because it "scarred" their kid or something.
User avatar
PheR
Special Edition
Posts: 510
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:08 am
Location: México

Post by PheR »

well, 'Mort' as already a dark theme so, well, let's see how it turns out.
I'ts enough for this restless warrior just to be with you...
User avatar
Semaj
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:22 am
Location: Buffalo
Contact:

Post by Semaj »

littlefuzzy wrote:It would have to come from another "imprint" like Touchstone. If Disney (or Pixar) released a dark mature pg-13 animated film, there would be vast hordes of parents that took their 5-6 year olds to the latest Disney flick, and then they'd be mad because it "scarred" their kid or something.
That'd be their own faults for ignoring A) the movie ratings and B) any other warning that the film is not for babies.
Disneyphile
Special Edition
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:27 am
Location: San Jose CA

Post by Disneyphile »

When Disney has gone the darker route in the past, (Black Cauldron, Hunchback, Atlantis) the movies haven't really been embraced by the public at large. Each movie may have fervent fans, but generally they're not accepted as classics in most people's minds. For that reason, it will probably be a while before they enter that territory in animation again.
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

littlefuzzy wrote:It would have to come from another "imprint" like Touchstone. If Disney (or Pixar) released a dark mature pg-13 animated film, there would be vast hordes of parents that took their 5-6 year olds to the latest Disney flick, and then they'd be mad because it "scarred" their kid or something.
Yeah which make Parents look like complete dumbasses for not reading the rating label.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
DisneyJedi
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3738
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Gender: Male

Post by DisneyJedi »

Disneyphile wrote:When Disney has gone the darker route in the past, (Black Cauldron, Hunchback, Atlantis) the movies haven't really been embraced by the public at large. Each movie may have fervent fans, but generally they're not accepted as classics in most people's minds. For that reason, it will probably be a while before they enter that territory in animation again.
At least Hunchback made back its money, plus a little more. Black Cauldron and Atlantis fell flat on their asses due to gaining back half their budgets, labeling them as financial failures.
dvdjunkie
Signature Collection
Posts: 5613
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by dvdjunkie »

I wouldn't want Disney to change a thing. For the most part all of the Disney Animated and Live Action Films have something for every age group to enjoy. Seeing the Disney Animated Classics is what family is all about.

Why would anyone want to foist another debacle like "South Park" or "The Simpson's" on the unsuspecting public. They didn't work before, and they sure as heck won't work again.

They tried adult humor years ago in "Nine Lives of Felix The Cat" and "Heavy Metal", and found that the American public wasn't buying into adult themed animation.

Even some of the wonderful Ghibli films have fallen by the wayside because of the fickle American movie goer who doesn't want to see anything that wanders over into the adult realm of things.
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

DARTH KNITE wrote:The darker films Beauty to Hunchback, were what I consider Disney's goldens age. Hercules was the most insulting thing I've ever seen to follow up something so groundbreaking as Hunchback. I'd love to see them go back to this style.
These films are being developed simultaneously, otherwise Disney wouldn't be able to put one out every year. All films have different styles. Or do you think 101 Dalmatians was 'insulting' to follow up Sleeping Beauty? It's okay to not like the movie, but your reasoning doesn't ring true.
User avatar
Flanger-Hanger
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3746
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: S.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters

Post by Flanger-Hanger »

dvdjunkie wrote:Why would anyone want to foist another debacle like "South Park" or "The Simpson's" on the unsuspecting public. They didn't work before, and they sure as heck won't work again..
:lol: At two things:

a) You assume "mature"=South Park-ish humour
b) You cite both Simpsons and South Park as failures despite the first being the longest running comedy/animated TV show ever with a feature grossing $527 million worldwide and the second airing its 15th season this year.

They both worked becuase they were made for a different audience, which wouldn't work for Disney, but even bringing those up is questionable given the fact the OP never suggested such style of adult humour, but instead serious themes.

As for the OP's actual question, yes I would, but not sugarcoated with animal sidekicks and forced comic relief. Neither of which I'd expect Disney to do.

However I'm fine with Disney movies as they are so long as they are still good like Tangled.
Image
User avatar
jpanimation
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am

Post by jpanimation »

Hunchback was originally going to be a very mature film. Many of the animators hate the final version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame because they know what it was originally going to be (Nik Ranieri is the most outspoken on this). The mature take was green lit and in production, then at the last minute, the execs got cold feet and demanded they lighten it up and shove in some Happy Meal characters. Many animators describe the original version as Hell Fire, but the whole movie. Gaëtan Brizzi (who along with his brother directed the fantastic opening sequence, Hell Fire sequence, The Court of Miracles sequence, and part of the ending execution sequence) said that the Hell Fire sequence is actually a toned down version of what they originally story boarded. I wish the executives would've allowed the creative team to make the movie they originally wanted to make.
Image
User avatar
Victurtle
Special Edition
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:06 pm

Post by Victurtle »

I've never viewed Disney as immature personally. Unlike say, Alvin & Co.

Bambi, Sleeping Beauty, Pinocchio, Dumbo, Lady and the Tramp, these movies have a quality of sophistication.

As for mature themes, I don't really like the idea of cranking out a movie for the sake of a theme, so as long as it isn't forced upon a story, I wouldn't mind. I'd love to see a movie about parents perhaps? A war periodical where two people are separated and desperately seek each other with tough decisions to be made.

An animated feature based on a true story could also be interesting. With an artistic license of course.
User avatar
4th Life of Thomasina
Limited Issue
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Post by 4th Life of Thomasina »

Victurtle wrote:An animated feature based on a true story could also be interesting. With an artistic license of course.
As long as it turns out better than Pocahontas...
Currently Watching/Playing/Reading:
Video Game: Epic Mickey
TV Series: Star Trek: The Animated Series
Novel: Lover Unleashed by J.R. Ward
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21102
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

I would love to see a more mature hand-drawn animated feature from WDAS even if it's not released under the Disney label.
Post Reply