"Princess Movies" not as dead as Disney thought?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
milojthatch
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2646
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:34 am

"Princess Movies" not as dead as Disney thought?

Post by milojthatch »

Guess who beat out "Harry Potter" at the box office this weekend? And who is close to crossing $100 million with a very strong chance of making a ton more then that? Disney recently made it know that they had no more "princess movies" in the pipe line and that the musical fairy tale was dead to them, at least for now. Maybe it's not as "dead" as they thought? Here is crossing fingers for "Snow Queen!"

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.ap. ... -office-ap
____________________________________________________________
All the adversity I've had in my life, all my troubles and obstacles, have strengthened me... You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you.

-Walt Disney
User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: "Princess Movies" not as dead as Disney though

Post by SpringHeelJack »

milojthatch wrote:Disney recently made it know that they had no more "princess movies" in the pipe line and that the musical fairy tale was dead to them, at least for now.
No, they really didn't.

http://www.facebook.com/Disney/posts/178092605539974
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
Pumba
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 2:33 pm

Post by Pumba »

The sad part is, even with this successful box office run, I see it finishing below $200M Domestic. That will be well short of its reported $260million budget (seriously, that is ridiculous!).
User avatar
BwayJ
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:10 pm
Location: Manteo, NC

Post by BwayJ »

Pumba wrote:The sad part is, even with this successful box office run, I see it finishing below $200M Domestic. That will be well short of its reported $260million budget (seriously, that is ridiculous!).
Don't forget the foreign intake. It'll make some money that way.
Pumba
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 2:33 pm

Post by Pumba »

I don't think studios get that much of a % from International gross. But yeah, it'll still be a success no doubt. I think the profits from merchandise and DVD/Blu-ray sales will be pretty big.
User avatar
DisneyJedi
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3737
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Gender: Male

Post by DisneyJedi »

Pumba wrote:The sad part is, even with this successful box office run, I see it finishing below $200M Domestic. That will be well short of its reported $260million budget (seriously, that is ridiculous!).
That's just what I'm believing! How in the name of fudge does Disney expect this to recoup its budget?! :(
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

It's best to give it a few more weeks (while it's still December and all). It's already earning more money at its rate than The Princess and the Frog did. I assume at the very least it will surpass TPATF's earnings.

In either case, Disney is only making a big deal because they worry about their biggest franchises not making the money they're expecting.

If Tangled breaks $200 million I expect they'll be changing their minds about a lot of things. :P
User avatar
Cheshire_Cat
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:59 am
Location: Texas

Post by Cheshire_Cat »

I really hope that they continue with The Snow Queen, because that looks like it could be made into a really good Disney movie. Just as long as it doesn't remind people so much of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe that they might think it's a rip-off. :lol:

Also, I really think they should loosen up on their current "no girly-themed movies" rule. I happened to love princess movies as a little boy, so, there! :wink:
User avatar
rs_milo_whatever
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:56 pm
Contact:

Post by rs_milo_whatever »

I just hope they don't go "Hmm they loved Tangled; must have been because it was CGI... yeah, I'm sure of it, audiences today are so stupid they can only ever love a CGI movie. The Ice Queen will now be a CGI movie called 'Chills'"
Image
LucilleBallFilms
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:20 pm
Location: The Hundred Acre Wood

Post by LucilleBallFilms »

rs_milo_whatever wrote:I just hope they don't go "Hmm they loved Tangled; must have been because it was CGI... yeah, I'm sure of it, audiences today are so stupid they can only ever love a CGI movie. The Ice Queen will now be a CGI movie called 'Chills'"
Menken reportedly said if Tangled's a smash Snow Queen will start production, and they're indeed thinking of making it CGI now :roll: (atleast I think he did :lol:) Darn Disney needs to make it traditional or i'll have to go up there and womp some people with my frying pan :wink:
Image
User avatar
Cheshire_Cat
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:59 am
Location: Texas

Post by Cheshire_Cat »

rs_milo_whatever wrote:I just hope they don't go "Hmm they loved Tangled; must have been because it was CGI... yeah, I'm sure of it, audiences today are so stupid they can only ever love a CGI movie. The Ice Queen will now be a CGI movie called 'Chills'"
I don't know whether to laugh or cower at that prospect. :lol: :o
User avatar
Prince Edward
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1184
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:23 pm
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Contact:

Post by Prince Edward »

rs_milo_whatever wrote:I just hope they don't go "Hmm they loved Tangled; must have been because it was CGI... yeah, I'm sure of it, audiences today are so stupid they can only ever love a CGI movie. The Ice Queen will now be a CGI movie called 'Chills'"
Hahaha, to funny!^^
User avatar
sunhuntin
Special Edition
Posts: 731
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:33 pm
Contact:

Post by sunhuntin »

Pumba wrote:I don't think studios get that much of a % from International gross. But yeah, it'll still be a success no doubt. I think the profits from merchandise and DVD/Blu-ray sales will be pretty big.
tangled hasnt been released in many countries yet. new zealand wont get it till february [you guys will probably have it on dvd by then! LOL]
big kid at heart
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

February's a tad soon. Disney'll want to aim at those easter baskets.
Image
User avatar
sunhuntin
Special Edition
Posts: 731
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:33 pm
Contact:

Post by sunhuntin »

yeh, true, forgot about easter!

im wondering if we will have the dvd by next xmas. i was expecting dispicable me to be out by now, but its not and wont be til next year.
big kid at heart
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

I'm pretty sure Disney will sell billions of Rapunzel dolls. Isn't that what this film was designed to do.... and the reason they were willing to invest all that time and money into it?

Think about it. A doll. With super long hair...

Ka-ching.

Why was Eisner desperate to get Cars in on the renewal of the Pixar deal? He KNEW (because he wasn't a complete idiot) that Cars would be a merchandise monster. Rapunzel is the same story.
User avatar
BelleGirl
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:36 am
Location: The Netherlands, The Hague

Post by BelleGirl »

I hope old school animation isn't declared dead yet!
Funny, in The Netherlands the original English version of 'Tangled' is simply called 'Rapunzel', as it should have been called in the USA release.

By the way, I don't see how "The Snow Queen" can be categorized as a princess story. It's not about a princess or a girl who become one.

I tnink that te succes of 'Rapunzel'proves that adaptations of traditional faiyr tales is sitll a golden formula, adn that audinece won't grow tired of it.
Image

See my growing collection of Disney movie-banners at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/78256383@N ... 651337290/
User avatar
sweetjuliet
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:06 pm

Post by sweetjuliet »

LucilleBallFilms wrote:Menken reportedly said if Tangled's a smash Snow Queen will start production, and they're indeed thinking of making it CGI now :roll: (atleast I think he did :lol:) Darn Disney needs to make it traditional or i'll have to go up there and womp some people with my frying pan :wink:
For some reason I don't think this would be a bed decision. As much as I love traditional animation, I can only imagine how beautifyl snow crystals or a snow palace would look in CGI.
Wonderlicious
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4661
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:47 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Wonderlicious »

BelleGirl wrote:By the way, I don't see how "The Snow Queen" can be categorized as a princess story. It's not about a princess or a girl who become one.

Nowadays, I think many people simply get mixed up with the term "fairy tale" and "princess story". :lol: :roll:

The original Snow Queen is basically about a girl searching for her best friend, and about her interactions with the characters she meets along the way. It's basically a fairy tale adventure concerning incidental children, more along the lines of something like Pinocchio or The Wizard of Oz than Sleeping Beauty or Cinderella. In fairness, the young girl does meet a princess and her prince on her quest (a crow thinks that the new prince is the lost friend), but a lot of adaptations I know excise this segment for whatever reason. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if they'd make the prince and princess the heartbeat of the story just for the sake of producing profitable merchandise. :headshake: If done right, The Snow Queen could be the next How to Train Your Dragon

As for the topic at hand, let me reiterate for the umpteenth time that LA Times article manipulated some truths a bit to get a juicy article. And I think that Tangled will be a profitable film. At the rate it's going, it should at least surpass Bolt and Enchanted in terms of US box office, and the film has opened hardly anywhere abroad. I think that the 260 million tag does include international marketing, and it'd push a good few million on DVD and Blu-Ray. Plus, as Patrick mentioned, the title character would be the ideal doll for any young girl. I don't think anybody is expecting it to do as well as Toy Story 3, but it's looking to be a film with a decent longevity as far as profits are concerned, and more than just a throwaway success like how Chicken Little was.
Last edited by Wonderlicious on Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MJW
Special Edition
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:33 am
Location: USA

Post by MJW »

Wonderlicious wrote:The original Snow Queen is basically about a girl searching for her best friend, and about her interactions with the characters she meets along the way. It's basically a fairy tale adventure concerning incidental children, more along the lines of something like Pinocchio or The Wizard of Oz than Sleeping Beauty or Cinderella.
The Snow Queen sounds like it has a lot of potential to be an epic tale, but I hope that if they do decide to proceed with production one day, whether hand-drawn or CGI, they don't turn it into some kind of buddy comedy or something. From what I understand, the original story has a very distinct tone, and I hope that they can keep that intact when adapting it to a film.
"If it's not Baroque, don't fix it!" - Cogsworth | My Blu-ray collection | My Studio Ghibli blog
Image
Post Reply