tightlacedboots, I think that Disney should have tried to have both parents and happy families in the films, and they should try in the furture, but in most cases I think having only one or no parents made the films work more, yes, dramatically.
Also, don't forget sometimes in the end you do see happy functional families, or the characters will get married and have children to gether...
toonaspie wrote:Though I do agree with tightlace that death doesnt always have to be an approach for creating a movie with emotional depth. One example is Beauty and the Beast where the emotional core of the story is about redemption and seeing the human in people we wouldnt think is there.
The Beast almost dies at the end and that's the saddest part!
pap64 wrote:If you guys allow me to go on a rant for a bit, I find it kind of annoying how people are knocking movies, TV shows, video games and other things because they are not 100% original when the reality is that obtaining complete originality is impossible. Even the most original story ever story has elements previously seen in other works of fiction. Again, go to tvtropes, type in a movie and you'll see what I mean.
What matters is the EXECUTION. If it does it well, then fine.
It doesn't matter what some site or a lot of people say, Disney came up with things, and it was only over time they became cliches by over use by other people. They came up with original versions of things, not just using them in a good way. Who can decide what a cliche, what one element is, when you could say they came up with their own elements. Originality is sometimes in tiny details, and a film is made up of all the tiny details. Only the basis of their stories, the books and fairy tales, aren't originally theirs.
But sometimes some films are blantantly unoriginal and bad at being original in any way. Sometimes they are clearly copiers, or purposely using old things. And that's when the complaints against originality is ok.