Pinocchio Remake?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Christian
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Orange County
Contact:

Post by Christian »

Thanks.
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

dont blame yourselves, it was our curiosities that drove us into buying the first DTV Disney sequels allowing Eisner to believe he had found his lowbudget money-in-the-bank answer, allowing things like Cinderella 2 and Bambi 2 to come into being!

If you really want to prevent a whole new franchise of shot by shot CGI remakes than the only way to do so is to not give into temptation (and curiosity) and keep everyone you can from seeing or buying Pinocchio CGI. I fear the worse for films like The Lion King ever since I saw that horribly done CGI of Zazu on the Plantinum Edition DVD
User avatar
MickeyMousePal
Signature Collection
Posts: 6629
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:40 pm
Location: The Incredibles LA!!!
Contact:

Post by MickeyMousePal »

No! Stop the re-make of Pinocchio!!!
Does Michael Eisner want to distroy the Disney Classes next?
First, the cheapsequels, no re-make what's next?
Pinocchio the Broadway oh I can't think of that!!! :x
The Simpsons Season 11 Buy it Now!

Fox Sunday lineup:

8:00 The Simpsons
8:30 King of the Hill
9:00 Family Guy
9:30 American Dad

Living in the 1980's:
Image
Christian
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Orange County
Contact:

Post by Christian »

How about a live action Pinnochio movie starring Roberto Benigni?
I fear the worse for films like The Lion King ever since I saw that horribly done CGI of Zazu on the Plantinum Edition DVD
I wouldn't put a lot of weight on that. That was just a menu screen and things tend to look cruddy and stunted and blocky on DVD menu screens. I highly, highly doubt that it has anything to do with how Zazu may be drawn in the future.
Last edited by Christian on Mon May 17, 2004 7:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

MickeyMousePal wrote:No! Stop the re-make of Pinocchio!!!
Does Michael Eisner want to distroy the Disney Classes next?
First, the cheapsequels, no re-make what's next?
Pinocchio the Broadway oh I can't think of that!!! :x
the fear is mutual just knowing that Tarzan is greenlit for Broadway. oy!
User avatar
DisneyChris
Special Edition
Posts: 646
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Post by DisneyChris »

As Christian and Aaron have said, of course, it would be interesting to see Pinocchio in a CGI version; I would like to see how it looks too.

But why should Disney put money on doing a remake of a film already made, and also frame by frame? I think they should think of new creative ideas other than using material previously produced. It's no difference with the sequels. Remember what Walt said about having brand new ideas. :wink:
User avatar
DreamerQ18
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1510
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 7:41 pm
Location: Daytona Beach Florida
Contact:

Post by DreamerQ18 »

This is TOTAL CRAP :evil: Some one needs to fired this man now :x before the magic is over. HOW DARE HE SUGGEST SUCH GARBAGE??? :evil: :evil: :evil:
User avatar
Joshua Clinard
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: Abilene
Contact:

Post by Joshua Clinard »

He won't be there next year. Thank goodness, because if this were to get made, Walt would roll over in his grave. It's stupid anywas.
User avatar
stlewis75
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:39 am
Location: USA

Post by stlewis75 »

This is so depressing. Every couple of days I get a new piece of news that reminds me of Disney's downward spiral. Eisner seems to be trying to trample everything on his way out. Hopefully he'll find his way out soon.
swray1024
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:59 pm
Location: Somewhere Out There

Post by swray1024 »

Maybe this won't see the light of day.
User avatar
Leonia
Special Edition
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:28 pm
Location: SoCal, where it sucks
Contact:

Post by Leonia »

.........

Let me quote Adam Sessler from X-Play in regards to their Cat in the Hat review (which I know has absolutely nothing to do with Disney, but I feel I have to get it out of the way):

"STOP SELLING OUT MY CHILDHOOD!"

That pretty much sums up my feelings about a potential, CGI-ied Pinocchio remake.
Image
User avatar
chaychay102royal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by chaychay102royal »

Dogtanian wrote:The more I hear about this Eisner creature, the less I like him.

"for a new generation to enjoy" - Huh? They can enjoy Pinocchio on DVD, dagnabbit. Utterly pointless.

Can't people learn from mistakes others have made in the past? The remake (clouds and all) of Psycho was absolutely awful, as almost all remakes of classic films are. Even if they pull it off quite well, it's not going to top the original, so why even bother? I doubt it's just for the money ( :roll: ), but if it is, surely they can just release Pinocchio 2 or some such nonsense.

:x
Agreed!
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Please don't bump threads that are two years old to say "Agreed."
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
User avatar
Isidour
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4092
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:09 pm
Location: Mexico!
Contact:

Post by Isidour »

Ok, let me get this:

There´s plans to make a CGI remark of pinochio??
don´t you mean a crappy spanish movie called "Pinochio 3000"?
or this is real?
Zoltack
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2528
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Zoltack »

I think if they're going to make a remake, they should do it the old fashion way. Hand drawing it, I think that's what made all of these Disney classics spectacular. But now a days people are lazy and want to use computers to compile and to animate all of these "screen shots." I mean, yeah it's faster and now we live in a world were computers, for me anyways is a way of life. But they really shouldn't mess with a classic. I rather they made a sequel using CGI than a remake.
Image
User avatar
Isidour
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4092
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:09 pm
Location: Mexico!
Contact:

Post by Isidour »

Agree!

It needs more "magic" to make a hand-draw movie than a CGI one.
Also, as somebody stated before, why making a remarke if we have already the DVD?
User avatar
ohmahaaha
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Norristown, PA

Post by ohmahaaha »

Hey, why don't we colorize "Citizen Kane" while we're at it?? :roll:
User avatar
chaychay102royal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by chaychay102royal »

Luke wrote:Please don't bump threads that are two years old to say "Agreed."
Oops, sorry Luke.
User avatar
pinkrenata
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1915
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:33 pm
Location: Mini Van Highway
Contact:

Post by pinkrenata »

I think that before people start getting worked up, they need to realize that this thread was created almost <b>2 years</b> ago. That's all I have to say about the subject. :roll:
WIST #1 (The pinkrenata Edition) -- Kram Nebuer: *mouth full of Oreos* Why do you have a picture of Bobby Driscoll?

"I'm a nudist!" - Tommy Kirk
Zoltack
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2528
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Zoltack »

pinkrenata wrote:I think that before people start getting worked up, they need to realize that this thread was created almost <b>2 years</b> ago. That's all I have to say about the subject. :roll:
Well I've never heard of it. But you're right.
Image
Post Reply