Tangled (formerly Rapunzel) Discussion - Part II

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.

Do you like the new title change?

Yes
4
3%
No
50
34%
It's not that bad/I'm used to it by now
45
31%
I hate it with a passion
28
19%
I love it
1
1%
I don't care either way
18
12%
 
Total votes: 146

User avatar
estefan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3195
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:27 pm

Post by estefan »

All I can say is "Took you long enough, Disney." Honestly, at this point in time a year ago, we saw so much footage from The Princess and the Frog, it's ridiculous that we've seen so little of Tangled. Oh, well. At least, now, we know when we can expect the trailer. And hopefully, some of those Top Secret Tours will be shown, too. They owe us that much.
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

Well Disney fans, at least we know when the trailer for Disney's, "Rapunzel (Tangled)," is coming. Next week on Monday, June 14, 2010, on Facebook.
User avatar
toonaspie
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1438
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:17 am

Post by toonaspie »

Seems very likely that the trailer will play alonside Toy Story 3 but I dunno if I can sit through a trailer for this film. I dunno, from what I've seen it's getting less and less tolerable for me.
User avatar
Margos
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA

Post by Margos »

You know... I think it's very interesting how little we've seen of Tangled compared to TPatF. Even though TPatF was a return to classic Disney animation... Maybe Tangled represents the real second Renaissance. Even though it's CG, it seems so far as though it will be the most beautiful CG we've ever seen from any studio to date, and the fact that the music is Menken again... Maybe they've been saving it so that it won't be as familiar when it comes out as TPatF was.... Just a thought.
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com

^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

You know what, I have to admit. Even though the name of the movie is kind of misguided, but deep inside of the movie itself, it will STILL be a good movie no matter what. Who knows, it could be as good as, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," or maybe BETTER. That depends when it comes out in theaters, and the best part is, it comes out after, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1." If it comes out before, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," Disney is doomed.
User avatar
DisneyJedi
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3737
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Gender: Male

Post by DisneyJedi »

Polizzi wrote:You know what, I have to admit. Even though the name of the movie is kind of misguided, but deep inside of the movie itself, it will STILL be a good movie no matter what. Who knows, it could be as good as, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," or maybe BETTER. That depends when it comes out in theaters, and the best part is, it comes out after, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1." If it comes out before, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," Disney is doomed.
According to Imdb, HPatDHpt.1 is coming out on the 19th of November, whereas Tangled comes out on the 24th, just as Thanksgiving Break begins. :)
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

Polizzi I saw your comment on Tangled's facebook page... how can you possibly think that GORGEOUS drawing is no good? First of all, it's done by Glen Keane, the master of everything animation and/or Disney related, and second... it's just concept art! Just because he looks a little buff and her hair isn't perfectly well detailed and everything doesn't make that a bad drawing. Everything in this CONCEPT SKETCH is completely perfect, and a lot of animators would kill to be able to do it.
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Post by robster16 »

OMG! I hd such high hopes of finding at least a crappy capture of the commercial advertising the trailer/sneak preview on the Disney Channel this morning.

Seriously people I BEG of you to please, please, please record it somehow. Just put on The Disney Channel, record it to dvd or tivo it, then get in front of your tv screen with a digital video or photocamera and film or photograph the screen and upload it online to youtube or a direct download! It's hardly difficult or time consuming, but it would make SO MANY people in Europe happy that we can see the first footage of the movie, actually fully rendered and animated!

I BEG BEG BEG BEG BEG of you PLEASE!!!
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

SWillie! wrote:Polizzi I saw your comment on Tangled's facebook page... how can you possibly think that GORGEOUS drawing is no good? First of all, it's done by Glen Keane, the master of everything animation and/or Disney related, and second... it's just concept art! Just because he looks a little buff and her hair isn't perfectly well detailed and everything doesn't make that a bad drawing. Everything in this CONCEPT SKETCH is completely perfect, and a lot of animators would kill to be able to do it.
I didn't say that the concept art is terrible, I just said that the art of Flynn Rider needs a few adjustments, that's all. And as for Rapunzel, she DOESN'T need any adjustments, she's perfect, including her long golden hair. For the record, I like the art very much, it's just that Flynn Rider needs a few adjustments. And on top of that, according to another comment described by someone else besides me, he does kind of look like Gaston from Disney's, "Beauty and the Beast," but different.

P.S. I give Glen Keane's art an A-.
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

DisneyJedi wrote:
Polizzi wrote:You know what, I have to admit. Even though the name of the movie is kind of misguided, but deep inside of the movie itself, it will STILL be a good movie no matter what. Who knows, it could be as good as, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," or maybe BETTER. That depends when it comes out in theaters, and the best part is, it comes out after, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1." If it comes out before, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1," Disney is doomed.
According to Imdb, HPatDHpt.1 is coming out on the 19th of November, whereas Tangled comes out on the 24th, just as Thanksgiving Break begins. :)
Like I said according to the previous quote:
Polizzi wrote:That depends when it comes out in theaters, and the best part is, it comes out after, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 1."
This could give Disney a higher advantage than, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows,"...maybe. To you Disney fans, it will.
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

Margos wrote:You know... I think it's very interesting how little we've seen of Tangled compared to TPatF. Even though TPatF was a return to classic Disney animation... Maybe Tangled represents the real second Renaissance. Even though it's CG, it seems so far as though it will be the most beautiful CG we've ever seen from any studio to date, and the fact that the music is Menken again... Maybe they've been saving it so that it won't be as familiar when it comes out as TPatF was.... Just a thought.
Please, let's not get our hopes too high. After TPATF, we'll just disappoint ourselves. If Tangled is a huge success, so be it, but let's try and not pressure it into becoming the fourth golden age of Disney.
User avatar
Margos
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA

Post by Margos »

UmbrellaFish wrote:
Margos wrote:You know... I think it's very interesting how little we've seen of Tangled compared to TPatF. Even though TPatF was a return to classic Disney animation... Maybe Tangled represents the real second Renaissance. Even though it's CG, it seems so far as though it will be the most beautiful CG we've ever seen from any studio to date, and the fact that the music is Menken again... Maybe they've been saving it so that it won't be as familiar when it comes out as TPatF was.... Just a thought.
Please, let's not get our hopes too high. After TPATF, we'll just disappoint ourselves. If Tangled is a huge success, so be it, but let's try and not pressure it into becoming the fourth golden age of Disney.
Hey, I was happy enough with TPatF's return to classic form that I'm already pretty sure were in another golden age. I'm just saying, maybe it's like TLM and BatB.... A really great movie followed by an even better really great movie!
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com

^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

Polizzi wrote:P.S. I give Glen Keane's art an A-.
Do you even know who you're talking about? You're talking about the man who animated THIS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cDC9ExkZYE

He's an animation God. Us up and coming animators actually worship him. A stick figure drawn by him is more expressive and interesting than a multiple hour drawing done by most.

Can I ask how you can give that an A-? Where does the "-" come from?
User avatar
Want2beBelle
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:10 pm

Post by Want2beBelle »

SWillie! wrote:
Polizzi wrote:P.S. I give Glen Keane's art an A-.
Do you even know who you're talking about? You're talking about the man who animated THIS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cDC9ExkZYE

He's an animation God. Us up and coming animators actually worship him. A stick figure drawn by him is more expressive and interesting than a multiple hour drawing done by most.

Can I ask how you can give that an A-? Where does the "-" come from?
I know imagine trying to come up with what he does i know i couldn't! lol
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

The A- is only for the Rapunzel, but he earns an infinite A+ on most of the arts.
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

SWillie! wrote:
Polizzi wrote:P.S. I give Glen Keane's art an A-.
Do you even know who you're talking about? You're talking about the man who animated THIS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cDC9ExkZYE

He's an animation God. Us up and coming animators actually worship him. A stick figure drawn by him is more expressive and interesting than a multiple hour drawing done by most.

Can I ask how you can give that an A-? Where does the "-" come from?
He's great in fact amazing. but his doesn't blow my mind like Richard William does. Check his thief and cobbler stuff(not the half ass marimax one) i mean original one he intended for. And again there's roger rabbit too.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Post by robster16 »

Super Aurora wrote:
SWillie! wrote: Do you even know who you're talking about? You're talking about the man who animated THIS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cDC9ExkZYE

He's an animation God. Us up and coming animators actually worship him. A stick figure drawn by him is more expressive and interesting than a multiple hour drawing done by most.

Can I ask how you can give that an A-? Where does the "-" come from?
He's great in fact amazing. but his doesn't blow my mind like Richard William does. Check his thief and cobbler stuff(not the half ass marimax one) i mean original one he intended for. And again there's roger rabbit too.
Richard Williams is technically flawless, but in my opinion Glen Keane's work breathes emotion and technically he is just on another level. Every drawing he makes is built up out of volumes, like he sculpts his drawings in 3D while drawing. It's just... I could pick those drawings and his technique apart frame by frame for decades. So much wonderfull stuff...
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

robster16 wrote:Richard Williams is technically flawless, but in my opinion Glen Keane's work breathes emotion and technically he is just on another level. Every drawing he makes is built up out of volumes, like he sculpts his drawings in 3D while drawing. It's just... I could pick those drawings and his technique apart frame by frame for decades. So much wonderfull stuff...
Agreed.
Image
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Post by robster16 »

OMFG!!!! Our first look at finished animation from Tangled!!! From Disneylicious!

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iUsmBb8AaRI&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iUsmBb8AaRI&hl=nl_NL&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

looove the hair. They totally got it right.
Post Reply