Tangled (formerly Rapunzel) Discussion - Part II

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.

Do you like the new title change?

Yes
4
3%
No
50
34%
It's not that bad/I'm used to it by now
45
31%
I hate it with a passion
28
19%
I love it
1
1%
I don't care either way
18
12%
 
Total votes: 146

User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

robster16 wrote:
Siren wrote: Exactly.

Though if you don't like the discussion, no one is making you be part of it. Just wait till it interests you and then join in. But to silence others just because you don't like the fact we are talking about how pretty the movie is or a plot point doesn't mean our conversation holds any less weight about the movie.

Shall we go back into talking about foot fetishes? Because frankly, I prefer the chameleon talk over that ridiculous drivel. Least the chameleon talk has something to actually do with the movie.
Why do you think everything I say is meant negatively? Of course I only join in on conversation and discussion when something interests me, which is why I ignored the foot fetish conversation and did voice my opinion on the chameleon thing.

You can also stop putting words in my mouth, because in no way was I trying to silence anyone. I was just giving you my two cents concerning the ongoing discussion. No harm in that I think.

My last response was merely made to illustrate the point that, as you point out, we get the tendency to go sliiiiightly off-topic because of the lack of actual updates about the movie from Disney itself. I'm all for discussing every aspect of the movie, don't get me wrong, but I'm anxiously waiting the moment we can start discussing the plot, the characters designs, the artwork, the animation etc.

So by all means, don't mind me and please don't take offense because the last thing I want to do is ruffle anyone's feathers with my opinion. Even though you seem to think that's exactly why I'm here based on your replies to my posts...
Exactly. Siren, you seem to have have taken our two, fairly lighthearted posts, and gotten all offended and taken them negatively. Neither of us were literally trying to silence anyone. Relax.
User avatar
Prudence
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: The Kingdom of Perrault

Re: Foot Fetishes (or the reverse)

Post by Prudence »

I know a guy who is afraid of feet. People take off their shoes and socks just to annoy him. He deserves it, though, because he is always making other people sick to their stomachs. However, the people that are disturbed by him are not the same people who disturb him. Karma is weird.
Image
That's hot.
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

SWillie! wrote:
Exactly. Siren, you seem to have have taken our two, fairly lighthearted posts, and gotten all offended and taken them negatively. Neither of us were literally trying to silence anyone. Relax.
Sorry, I can't read minds. If you expected me to take them lightheartedly then maybe you need to be a bit more clear. Add a :wink:. I am sorry I misunderstood you, but you can't blame me 100% for that when you weren't obviously clear yourselves.
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

Dear Disney:
The recent lack of information regarding your 50th animated feature, Tangled, has driven our Ultimate Disney community mad. We now have begun to accuse each other of over-analyzing plot elements, talk about foot fetishes, chameleons and other topics irrelevant to the film. We will be very grateful if you released more information that we can actually discuss, like story, character details, videos and images so our community can be happy once more.

Eagerly anticipating the movie:
The Ultimate Disney Community

:lol: :P
ImageImageImageImage

Image
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Post by robster16 »

Siren wrote:
SWillie! wrote:
Exactly. Siren, you seem to have have taken our two, fairly lighthearted posts, and gotten all offended and taken them negatively. Neither of us were literally trying to silence anyone. Relax.
Sorry, I can't read minds. If you expected me to take them lightheartedly then maybe you need to be a bit more clear. Add a :wink:. I am sorry I misunderstood you, but you can't blame me 100% for that when you weren't obviously clear yourselves.
Well, in my case you'll have to blame the language barriere. Being dutch I try my best at english, but it's sometimes difficult to find the exact right words and nuances necesarry to make my point :) But trust me, I'll never consciously attack anyone or try to cause fights. I'm just not that kind of person :)
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

robster16 wrote:
Siren wrote: Sorry, I can't read minds. If you expected me to take them lightheartedly then maybe you need to be a bit more clear. Add a :wink:. I am sorry I misunderstood you, but you can't blame me 100% for that when you weren't obviously clear yourselves.
Well, in my case you'll have to blame the language barriere. Being dutch I try my best at english, but it's sometimes difficult to find the exact right words and nuances necesarry to make my point :) But trust me, I'll never consciously attack anyone or try to cause fights. I'm just not that kind of person :)
And robster also put a couple :) in his post, sooo I find it hard to take that negatively. And in my case, I said "Grrrrrrrr." Anyone being serious, in my experience, will not say "Grrrrrrr."

But I'll try to be more clear next time.
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

pap64 wrote:Dear Disney:
The recent lack of information regarding your 50th animated feature, Tangled, has driven our Ultimate Disney community mad. We now have begun to accuse each other of over-analyzing plot elements, talk about foot fetishes, chameleons and other topics irrelevant to the film. We will be very grateful if you released more information that we can actually discuss, like story, character details, videos and images so our community can be happy once more.

Eagerly anticipating the movie:
The Ultimate Disney Community

:lol: :P
And Maximus, Flynn Rider's horse.
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

SWillie! wrote:
robster16 wrote: Well, in my case you'll have to blame the language barriere. Being dutch I try my best at english, but it's sometimes difficult to find the exact right words and nuances necesarry to make my point :) But trust me, I'll never consciously attack anyone or try to cause fights. I'm just not that kind of person :)
And robster also put a couple :) in his post, sooo I find it hard to take that negatively. And in my case, I said "Grrrrrrrr." Anyone being serious, in my experience, will not say "Grrrrrrr."

But I'll try to be more clear next time.
I'm not going to quote all robster's posts, but all the posts I REPLIED to from him, NONE of them had a :). Like I said, its the internet, you cannot expect me nor anyone else to know your context automatically. Sometimes even WITH smilies. ;) can be viewed as being sarcastic or smartass.

If you want to continue this, by all means, maybe you like this better than the chameleon talk. Personally, I prefer it, don't you?
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

You can tell how a person reacted on internet from the way they demonstrated their personality. I bet most of everyone knows that I joke a lot and that If I saw something that might seem offensive they usually take it light heartily cause they know I never aggressively attack toward anyone or hardly get angry.

When willie post that message, I wasn't sure exactly if he maybe serious or joking so I just made a joke respond to it by posting a "in your face" chameleon pic.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

Super Aurora wrote:You can tell how a person reacted on internet from the way they demonstrated their personality. I bet most of everyone knows that I joke a lot and that If I saw something that might seem offensive they usually take it light heartily cause they know I never aggressively attack toward anyone or hardly get angry.

When willie post that message, I wasn't sure exactly if he maybe serious or joking so I just made a joke respond to it by posting a "in your face" chameleon pic.
And that was a perfect response to it, because, while I understand that I haven't been posting as long as you have and so I don't expect everyone to know what I'm like yet, they were both lighthearted posts, and from the posts of yours that I have read, it seems like we have a very similar personality. I laughed out loud at that picture.

And Siren, you actually did reply directly to a post by robster that had smileys in it:
Siren wrote:
robster16 wrote: Agreed, this is probably all because of the fact that Disney isn't giving us anything to discuss. No pictures, no press releases, trailers, synopsis, nothing. So we dissect and overanalyse each tiny little aspect of info we can find :) If only they started releasing info, pictures and trailers already, then we'd hopefully have some joyfull and happy discussions :)
Exactly.

Though if you don't like the discussion, no one is making you be part of it. Just wait till it interests you and then join in. But to silence others just because you don't like the fact we are talking about how pretty the movie is or a plot point doesn't mean our conversation holds any less weight about the movie.

Shall we go back into talking about foot fetishes? Because frankly, I prefer the chameleon talk over that ridiculous drivel. Least the chameleon talk has something to actually do with the movie.
And this^^^ post of yours is what me and robster were referring to when we said you took us too negatively.

I'm sorry this is being dragged out like this. I just didn't mean to start any problems or offend anyone with my first post, and so I'm just trying to make sure everyone (you especially) knows that.
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

I am starting to agree about this comment about Pascal the chameleon. I wonder why Disney made that character in the first place? Was it because of the tongue that can tangle as Rapunzel's hair does? He is the only friend for Rapunzel? Or what? I was just curious, but I hope Disney has something useful for Pascal. Because some characters can be a waste of time, like the frog hunters from Disney's, "The Princess and the Frog."

I bet one of you would ask me this question, I think: What about Dorothy's dog from, "The Wizard of Oz?" Forgive me for getting on the wrong subject, that is another curiosity question.
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

Polizzi wrote:I am starting to agree about this comment about Pascal the chameleon. I wonder why Disney made that character in the first place? Was it because of the tongue that can tangle as Rapunzel's hair does? He is the only friend for Rapunzel? Or what? I was just curious, but I hope Disney has something useful for Pascal. Because some characters can be a waste of time, like the frog hunters from Disney's, "The Princess and the Frog."

I bet one of you would ask me this question, I think: What about Dorothy's dog from, "The Wizard of Oz?" Forgive me for getting on the wrong subject, that is another curiosity question.
Because chameleons are awesome. That's common knowledge.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Post by robster16 »

Polizzi wrote:I am starting to agree about this comment about Pascal the chameleon. I wonder why Disney made that character in the first place? Was it because of the tongue that can tangle as Rapunzel's hair does? He is the only friend for Rapunzel? Or what? I was just curious, but I hope Disney has something useful for Pascal. Because some characters can be a waste of time, like the frog hunters from Disney's, "The Princess and the Frog."

I bet one of you would ask me this question, I think: What about Dorothy's dog from, "The Wizard of Oz?" Forgive me for getting on the wrong subject, that is another curiosity question.
Apparently after reading a translation of the character description posted with the picture at the source Pascal is a confidant of Rapunzel inside her tower and gives her advice during her stay in the tower, but he also contains a very important clue to her royal heritage. What that it exactly, we'll all have to find out once the movie is out I guess. But he does seem to have a major part in the movie's plot progression...
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

robster16 wrote:Apparently after reading a translation of the character description posted with the picture at the source Pascal is a confidant of Rapunzel inside her tower and gives her advice during her stay in the tower, but he also contains a very important clue to her royal heritage. What that it exactly, we'll all have to find out once the movie is out I guess. But he does seem to have a major part in the movie's plot progression...
I read this description too (well, sort of, I actually had Rey read it to me since he's fluent in Spanish :p) and I'm left wondering if he'll be a bit like Flit in Pocahontas, as in being very [overly?] protective of his human friend, wanting to keep her safe by following a set of "rules."
Image
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

Found this today:

Image

Source.

Apparently the accompanying article states that the name of the film hasn't been finalized for the Mexican release.
Image
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

enigmawing wrote:Found this today:

Image

Source.

Apparently the accompanying article states that the name of the film hasn't been finalized for the Mexican release.
It's beautiful. She looks so cute. I wish they keep the name, "Rapunzel," in Mexico.
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

enigmawing wrote:Apparently the accompanying article states that the name of the film hasn't been finalized for the Mexican release.
the film hasn't been finalized for any type of release in any shape or form anywhere ever. :lol:
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

That clipart is prettier than the other pieces we've seen. I'm sure though, the actual movie footage will blow us away.
User avatar
Polizzi
Special Edition
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:42 pm

Post by Polizzi »

PatrickvD wrote:
enigmawing wrote:Apparently the accompanying article states that the name of the film hasn't been finalized for the Mexican release.
the film hasn't been finalized for any type of release in any shape or form anywhere ever. :lol:
Maybe. It remains a mystery is what I say.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14016
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Disney's Tangled

Post by Disney Duster »

Thank you very much Disney's Divinity and Atlanticaunderthesea! For replying about my designs, saying such nice things, and that historical info.

I don't think this is supposed to be England, but I'm mainly concerned about the bodice looking more like what a peasant would wear if it's for a princess. If you have seen royals wearing things like that Altantica, then maybe it's alright. Though I still think my idea looks better, lol.

I'm glad the chameleon may be historically correct, too.

If someone has a foot fetish, lots of people do. I don't like feet that way, but don't call it disgusting. After all, I suppose caring about pretty feet really is in a Disney movie like Cinderella.

I still wish they would call this Rapunzel, as always. Glad to see the nice art coming from the film though, the art's in between cartoon and painting, and Rapunzel looks pretty.
Image
Post Reply