Miley's 9-year-old sister launches lingerie line for kids

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
KennethE
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:22 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by KennethE »

Goliath wrote:

I know there's been press releases of the company that produces the clothes, saying that it's not "lingerie". It's a form of damage control after the backlash they've received. However, the costumes these press releases describe match the outfits shown in the photo's *exactly*. They're just distancing themselves of the term "lingerie" and think that will make it all all-right.
... because we all know how much grown women looooooooove to dress up like ladybugs, TUTUS INCLUDED! Obviously somebody has never been to Party City. (half joking).
User avatar
Sky Syndrome
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Maine

Post by Sky Syndrome »

A while back, I bought a Miley Cyrus book on secondhand to read out of curiosity. It's titled Mad for Miley.

Here's an intriguing tidbit from page 88:
Billy Ray knows all too well the pressures that come with the biz. And he has cautioned Miley to watch out for the good as well as the bad. Billy Ray's also confident that Miley won't be a wild teenager who's always getting into trouble.
O RLY? :P

And to me, the girl holding up forked fingers is giving the 'V' for victory sign.
Image
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Re: Miley's 9-year-old sister launches lingerie line for kid

Post by Elladorine »

Goliath wrote:Image

Image
Ok, as for the ladybug outfit(s?) . . . whether or not they're labeled as lingerie, I certainly wouldn't want to see any little girls wearing those things. They look like a slutty excuse of the Halloween-type costumes that older girls like to wear, but to be fair it looks as though they're leaning against a giant pumpkin. :lol: And the black dress thing, why is it so short? The boots certainly don't help with the supposed innocence of the images here either. :p

The tutus . . . ok, I can deal with them. But the pole is pushing it. And in the last pic, once again, why are the dress things so short (I hesitate to call them actual dresses). They are definitely being sexualized in all these pics and it's sad the Billy Ray is ok with his young daughter going out in public like this.

As for the peace sign . . . if the back of the hand is facing the signer, it's "peace" or "victory." If the palm is facing the signer, it's insulting in certain countries, not typically the US. She probably didn't know better.
Image
TheSequelOfDisney
Signature Collection
Posts: 5263
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Ohio, United States of America

Post by TheSequelOfDisney »

This is simply another reason why ever member of the Cyrus family is a complete idiot.......


It's like they just don't get it.
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Flanger-Hanger
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3746
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: S.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters

Post by Flanger-Hanger »

TheSequelOfDisney wrote:It's like they just don't get it.
Yes they get it. They get lot$ of it!

Perhaps Billy Ray should have another kid to target the 0-5 range?
Image
User avatar
Enchantress
Special Edition
Posts: 982
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:55 am
Location: England

Post by Enchantress »

deleted
Last edited by Enchantress on Wed May 04, 2011 5:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
<a href="http://s48.photobucket.com/albums/f231/ ... =udsig.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f231/ ... /udsig.jpg" border="0" alt="lilo banner"></a>
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

KennethE wrote:... because we all know how much grown women looooooooove to dress up like ladybugs, TUTUS INCLUDED! Obviously somebody has never been to Party City. (half joking).
Grown women? This line is meant for young children. I don't get what you're saying. What is your point, if you have any at all? Are you here to downplay the disgrace that is putting makeup and sexually provocative outfits on 9 year old children? If so, why? Because her sister is a Disney 'star'?
User avatar
KennethE
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:22 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by KennethE »

:lol:
User avatar
Widdi
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1519
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: North Bay, Ontario

Post by Widdi »

You know, this is why Pedophiles say the little girl was asking for it... No respectable parent should let their child dress this way. You might as well just tape a big "RAPE ME" sign to them.
Post Reply